Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T10:07:01.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A poisoned gift? The hireability signals of an income-support program for the senior unemployed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Axana Dalle*
Affiliation:
Labour Economics & Welfare, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Research Foundation Flanders (Fellowship Fundamental Research 1I6422N), Brussel, Belgium
Philippe Sterkens
Affiliation:
Labour Economics & Welfare, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Stijn Baert
Affiliation:
Labour Economics & Welfare, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Labour Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Work Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany
*
Corresponding author: Axana Dalle; Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Many Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries invest heavily in labor-market programs to prolong careers. Although active labor-market programs have frequently been evaluated, less is known about passive programs supporting unemployed seniors financially. We focus on the latter by investigating the hiring opportunities of candidates who partake in a regime that ensures dismissed seniors a company supplement alongside regular unemployment benefits. Therefore, we conduct a scenario experiment in which genuine recruiters evaluate fictitious candidates who have spent varying durations unemployed in regimes with and without the company supplement. Because recruiters evaluate candidates' hireability and productivity perceptions, we can identify underlying mechanisms. Overall, we find no evidence of employer-side stigma hindering the re-employment of seniors unemployed in the program. Conversely, longer-term unemployed even benefit from this regime because it mitigates regular stigmatization of long-term unemployment, especially for men. Specifically, recruiters judge them more mildly – particularly regarding flexibility – when they receive the supplement and still apply.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Université catholique de Louvain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, D. (1995). Public policy in a model of long-term unemployment. Economica, 62(246), 161178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2554901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the abecedarian, perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 14811495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In Ashenfelter, O., & Rees, A. (Eds.), Discrimination in labour markets (pp. 333). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2019). Machine learning methods hat economist should know about. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 685725. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athey, S., & Wager, S. (2019). Estimating treatment effects with causal forests: An application. Observational Studies, 5(2), 3751. https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2019.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., & Micklewright, J. (1991). Unemployment compensation and labor market transitions: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(4), 16791727.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J., Giles, L., & Meager, N. (1996). Employers, recruitment and the unemployed. Brighton, UK: The Institute for Employment Studies.Google Scholar
Auer, P., Efendioğlu, Ü, & Leschke, J. (2005). Active labour market policies around the world: Coping with the consequences of globalization. Geneva, IT: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T. (2014). Factorial survey experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., Liebig, S., & Sauer, C. (2014). The factorial survey as a method for measuring sensitive issues. In Engel, U., Jann, B., Lynn, P., Scherpenzeel, A., & Sturgis, P. (Eds.), Improving survey methods: Lessons from recent research (pp. 137149). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baert, S. (2016). Wage subsidies and hiring chances for the disabled: Some causal evidence. European Journal of Health Economics, 17(1), 7186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0656-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baert, S. (2018). Hiring a gay man, taking a risk? A lab experiment on employment discrimination and risk aversion. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(8), 10151031. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1364950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baert, S., & De Pauw, A. S. (2014). Is ethnic discrimination due to distaste or statistics? Economics Letters, 125(2), 270273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baert, S., & Verhaest, D. (2019). Unemployment or overeducation: Which is a worse signal to employers? De Economist, 167(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-018-9330-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baert, S., De Visschere, S., Schoors, K., Vandenberghe, D., & Omey, E. (2016). First depressed, then discriminated against? Social Science & Medicine, 170, 247254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baguelin, O., & Remillon, D. (2014). Unemployment insurance and management of the older workforce in a dual labor market: Evidence from France. Labour Economics, 30, 245264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. (1992). A simple model of herd behaviour. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battisti, M., Giesing, Y., & Laurentsyeva, N. (2019). Can job search assistance improve the labour market integration of refugees? Evidence from a field experiment. Labour Economics, 61(C), 101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bejaković, P., & Mrnjavac, Z. (2018). The danger of long-term unemployment and measures for its reduction: The case of Croatia. Economic Research, 1(1), 18371850. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1521295Google Scholar
Bellis, A., Sigala, M., & Dewson, S. (2011). Employer engagement and jobcentre plus. Sheffield, England: Department for Work and Pensions Sheffield, Research Report No. 742.Google Scholar
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 9921026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohren, J. A., Haggag, K., Imas, A., & Pope, D. (2019). Inaccurate statistical discrimination: An identification problem. NBER Working Paper, No. 25935. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2014). Employers’ attitudes towards long-term unemployed people and the role of activation in Switzerland. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(4), 421430. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G., & Hinrichs, K. (2012). Statistical discrimination and employers’ recruitment: Practices for low-skilled workers. European Societies, 14(3), 338361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.677050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, M., Reshid, A. A., & Rooth, D. O. (2018). Neighborhood signalling effects, commuting time, and employment: Evidence from a field experiment. International Journal of Manpower, 39(4), 534549. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM09-2017-0234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 3967. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, M. (2006). Policy changes and the labour force participation of older workers: Evidence from six countries. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25(4), 387400. https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2007.0015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalle, A., Verhofstadt, E., & Baert, S. (2024). The subsidy trap: Explaining the unsatisfactory effectiveness of hiring subsidies for the senior unemployed. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 15285. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4727230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dar, A., & Tzannatos, Z. (1999). Active labor market programs: A review of the evidence from evaluations. Washington, DC: Social Protection World Bank.Google Scholar
De Coen, A., Forrier, A., & Sels, L. (2015). The impact of age on the reservation wage: The role of employment efficacy and work intention: A study in the Belgian context. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(3), NP83NP112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812473201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delbeke, K. (2019). VDAB blijft kampioen van jobzoektocht. De Standaard. Retrieved on January 16, 2023, from https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20191009_04654119Google Scholar
Derous, E., Ryan, A. M., & Nguyen, H. H. (2012). Multiple categorization in resume screening: Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 544570. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Stasio, V. (2014). Education as a signal of trainability: Results from a vignette study with Italian employers. European Sociological Review, 30(6), 796809. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockery, A., & Webster, E. (2002). Long-term unemployment and work deprived individuals: Issues and policies. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 5(2), 175193. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/18509Google Scholar
Eriksson, S., & Rooth, D. O. (2014). Do employers use unemployment as a sorting criterion when hiring? Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Review, 104(3), 10141039. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A., Lalive, R., & Zweimüller, J. (2005). The success of job applications: A new approach to programme evaluation. Labour Economics, 12(6), 739748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2004.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, R. G. (1997). Making the public employment service more effective through the introduction of market signals. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 25. https://doi.org/10.1787/031348351683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federale Overheidsdienst. (n.d.). Stelsel van werkloosheid met bedrijfstoeslag. Brussels, Belgium: Werk België. Retrieved on January 23, 2023, from https://werk.belgie.be/nl/themas/werkloosheid-en-weer-aan-het-werk/stelsel-van-werkloosheid-met-bedrijfstoeslag#toc_heading_8Google Scholar
Fossati, F., Liechti, F., & Wilson, A. (2021). Participation in labour market programmes: A positive or negative signal of employability? Acta Sociologica, 64(1), 7085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699320902837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, D., & Russell, H. (1998). Unemployment and life satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison. European Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 248280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600007633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangl, M. (2004). Institutions and the structure of labour market matching in the United States and West Germany. European Sociological Review, 20(3), 171187. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jch016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Ghayad, R. (2014). The jobless trap. New York, NY: Mimeo.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Grohmann, B., & Bodur, H. O. (2015). Brand social responsibility: Conceptualization, measurement, and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 375399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2279-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J., & Wise, D. (1998). Social security and retirement: An international comparison. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 158163. http://www.jstor.org/stable/116911Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8), 23952400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyma, A., & van Ours, J. C. (2005). How eligibility criteria and entitlement characteristics of unemployment benefits affect job finding rates of elderly workers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Mimeo.Google Scholar
Hullegie, P., & van Ours, J. C. (2014). Seek and ye shall find: How search requirements affect job finding rates of older workers. De Economist, 162, 377395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-014-9241-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, J., & Stuart, M. (2015). The demand-side of active labour market policies: A regional study of employer engagement in the work programme. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 443462. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279414000890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarosch, G., & Pilossoph, L. (2019). Statistical discrimination and duration dependence in the job finding rate. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4), 16311665. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. P., & Garcia-Serrano, C. (2004). The relationship between unemployment benefits and re-employment probabilities: Evidence from Spain. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(2), 239260. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-9049.2003.00083.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karren, R., & Sherman, K. (2012). Layoffs and unemployment discrimination: A new stigma. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(8), 848863. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211280193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroft, K., Lange, F., & Notowidigdo, M. J. (2013). Duration dependence and labour market conditions: Evidence from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 11231167. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kübler, D., Schmid, J., & Stüber, R. (2018). Gender discrimination in hiring across occupations: A nationally-representative vignette study. Labour Economics, 55(C), 215229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2018.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010). Statistical graphics in SAS: An introduction to the graph template language and the statistical graphics procedures. SAS Publishing.Google Scholar
Kyyrä, T., & Ollikainen, V. (2008). To search or not to search? The effects of UI benefit extension for the older unemployed. Journal of Public Economics, 92(10–11), 20482070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahey, J. N. (2008). Age, women, and hiring an experimental study. Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 3056. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.43.1.30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalive, R. (2008). How do extended benefits affect unemployment duration? A regression discontinuity approach. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 785806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalive, R., & Zweimüller, J. (2004). Benefit entitlement and unemployment duration: The role of policy endogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 88(12), 25872616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammers, M., Bloemen, H., & Hochguertel, S. (2013). Job search requirements for older unemployed: Transitions to employment, early retirement and disability benefits. European Economic Review, 58, 3157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K., & Kahn-Lang Spitzer, A. (2020). Race discrimination: An economic perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 6889. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.2.68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liechti, F., Fossati, F., Bonoli, G., & Auer, D. (2017). The signalling value of labour market programmes. European Sociological Review, 33(2), 257274. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw061Google Scholar
Lippens, L., Vermeiren, S., & Baert, S. (2023). The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments. European Economic Review, 151, 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luijkx, R., & Wolbers, M. H. (2009). The effects of non-employment in early work-life on subsequent employment chances of individuals in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 647660. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. P., & Grubb, D. (2001). What works and for whom: A review of OECD countries’ experiences with active labour market policies. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8(2), 956. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.348621Google Scholar
McGregor, J., & Gray, L. (2002). Stereotypes and older workers: The New Zealand experience. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 18, 163177.Google Scholar
McKibben, W. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2017). Evaluating the distorting effects of inattentive responding and social desirability on self-report scales in creativity and the arts. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 5769. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooi-Reci, I., & Ganzeboom, H. B. (2015). Unemployment scarring by gender: Human capital depreciation or stigmatization? Longitudinal evidence from the Netherlands, 1980–2000. Social Science Research, 52, 642658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumark, D. (2018). Experimental research on labor market discrimination. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 799866. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuijten, M. P., Poell, R. F., & Alfes, K. (2017). Extracurricular activities of Dutch university students and their effect on employment opportunities as perceived by both students and organizations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 360370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2008). Nonemployment stigma as rational herding: A field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(1), 3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2006). Live long, work longer. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264035881-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2018). Council recommendation on ageing and employment. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved on January 24, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Flyer_AE_Council%20Recommendation.pdfGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2020). Benefits and wages: Comparative policy tables. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved on January 24, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/social/benefits-and-wages/Google Scholar
OECD. (2022). Long-term unemployment rate. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved on January 24, 2023, from https://data.oecd.org/unemp/long-term-unemployment-rate.htmGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2023). Public spending on labour markets (indicator). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved on January 24, 2023, from https://data.oecd.org/socialexp/public-spending-on-labour-markets.htm#indicator-chartGoogle Scholar
Orfao, G., & Malo, M. (2021). Are active labour market policies effective for the older unemployed? A meta-evaluation. Ageing & Society, 1, 121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001288Google Scholar
Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659661. https://doi.org/10.2307/1806107Google Scholar
Reissert, B., & Schmid, G. (2016). Unemployment compensation and active labor market policy: The impact of unemployment benefits on income security, work incentives, and public policy. In Reissert, B. (Ed.), Labor market institutions in Europe: A socioeconomic evaluation of performance (pp. 83119). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:13.0.CO;2-I3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, B., Webb, J., Webber, L., & Smith, K. (2012). Age discrimination in the evaluation of job applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 3544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00979.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, V. K., Perz, J., & Harris, E. (2012). Vocationally oriented cognitive behavioural training for the very long-term unemployed. Occupational Medicine, 62(4), 298300. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shi, L. P., & Wang, S. (2022). Demand-side consequences of unemployment and horizontal skill mismatches across national contexts: An employer-based factorial survey experiment. Social Science Research, 104, 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stam, K., Sieben, I., Verbakel, E., & De Graaf, P. M. (2016). Employment status and subjective well-being: The role of the social norm to work. Work, Employment and Society, 30(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014564602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stata. (n.d.). Ologit – Ordered logistic regression. College Station, TX: Manuals. Retrieved on November 15, 2022 from https://www.stata.com/manuals/rologit.pdfGoogle Scholar
Statbel. (2022). Strong increase in the number of employed people in 2021. Belgian Federal Government. Retrieved on January 24, 2023 from https://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/strong-increase-number-employed-people-2021Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J. B. E., De Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010). Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 199214. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterkens, P., Baert, S., Rooman, C., & Derous, E. (2021). As if it weren't hard enough already: Breaking down hiring discrimination following burnout. Economics and Human Biology, 43(2), 101050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterkens, P., Dalle, A., Wuyts, J., Pauwels, I., Durinck, H., & Baert, S. (2022). Homosexuality's signalling function in job candidate screening: Why gay is (mostly) OK. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 15285. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4114870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suomi, A., Schofield, T., Haslam, N., & Butterworth, P. (2022). Is unemployment benefit stigma related to poverty, payment receipt, or lack of employment? A vignette experiment about Australian views. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 22(2), 694711. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsiramos, K. (2010). Job displacement and the transitions to re-employment and early retirement for non-employed older workers. European Economic Review, 54(4), 517535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. (2002). New policies for older workers. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, P., & Walker, A. (1998). Employers and older workers: Attitudes and employment practices. Ageing & Society, 18(6), 641658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X98007119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurow, L. C. (1975). Generating inequality: Mechanisms of distribution in the U.S. economy. New York, NY: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Belle, E., Di Stasio, V., Caers, R., De Couck, M., & Baert, S. (2018). Why are employers put off by long spells of unemployment? European Sociological Review, 34(6), 694710. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Belle, E., Caers, R., De Couck, M., Di Stasio, V., & Baert, S. (2019). The signal of applying for a job under a vacancy referral scheme. Industrial Relations, 58(2), 251274. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Borm, H., Burn, I., & Baert, S. (2021). What does a job candidate's age signal to employers? Labour Economics, 71, 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meer, P. H. (2014). Gender, unemployment and subjective well-being: Why being unemployed is worse for men than for women. Social Indicators Research, 115(1), 2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0207-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishwanath, T. (1989). Job search, stigma effect, and escape rate from unemployment. Journal of Labor Economics, 7(4), 487502. https://doi.org/10.1086/298218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlaams Parlement. (2019). Verslag vergadering 541 (2019–2020). Brussels, Belgium: Commissie voor Economie, Werk, Sociale Economie, Wetenschap en Innovatie. Retrieved on January 27, 2023 from https://www.vlaamsparlement.be/nl/parlementair-werk/commissies/commissievergaderingen/1348575/verslag/1350836Google Scholar
Vlaams Parlement. (2021). Verslag vergadering 903 (2021–2022). Brussels, Belgium: Commissie voor Economie, Werk, Sociale Economie, Wetenschap en Innovatie. Retrieved on January 27, 2023 from https://www.vlaamsparlement.be/nl/parlementair-werk/commissies/commissievergaderingen/1580332/verslag/1585510Google Scholar
Vlaanderen. (n.d.). Aanwervingsincentive voor langdurig werkzoekenden. Brussels, Belgium: Departement Werk en Sociale Economie. Retrieved on January 24, 2023 from https://www.vlaanderen.be/aanwervingsincentive-voor-langdurig-werkzoekendenGoogle Scholar
Vodopivec, M., Finn, D., Laporšek, S., Vodopivec, M., & Cvörnjek, N. (2019). Increasing employment of older workers: Addressing labour market obstacles. Journal of Population Ageing, 12(3), 273298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-018-9236-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wager, S., & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), 12281242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T. (2003). Identifying treatment effects of active labour market programmes for Norwegian adults. Oslo, Norway: Memorandum Oslo University, No. 26.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dalle et al. supplementary material 1

Dalle et al. supplementary material
Download Dalle et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 190.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dalle et al. supplementary material 2

Dalle et al. supplementary material
Download Dalle et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 705.1 KB