Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:25:19.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yoghurt made from single starter organisms using heat- or enzyme-treated milk or milk to which casein hydrolysate or sodium formate is added

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Valerie M. E. Marshall ,
Wendy M. Cole  and
Leonard A. Mabbitt
Valerie M. E. Marshall
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Wendy M. Cole
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Leonard A. Mabbitt
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Yoghurts were made with single strain starter organisms Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, L. bulgaricus being cultured in milk + 50 ppm Na formate or in autoclaved milk and Str. thermophilus in milk treated with the proteinase Maxazyme(R) or with added casein hydrolysate. They were assessed chemically and organoleptically and compared with conventional mixed starter yoghurt. The single starter yoghurts all had acceptable acidities and acetaldehyde levels and keeping quality was good. The coagulum of each was firm and when stirred no syneresis occurred; the yoghurts remained smooth and all had an excellent appearance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 147 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bautista, E. S., Dahiya, R. S. & Speck, M. L. 1966 Identification of compounds causing symbiotic growth of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus in milk. Journal of Dairy Research 33 299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottazzi, V. & Vescovo, M. 1969 Carbonyl compounds produced by yoghurt bacteria. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 23 71–78Google Scholar
Crawford, R. J. M. 1962 How to succeed with yoghurt. Dairy Engineering 79 4–10Google Scholar
Desmazeaud, M. J. & Hermier, J. H. 1972 Isolation and determination of qualitative compositon of peptides from casein which enhance the growth of Streptococcus thermophilus. European Journal of Biochemistry 28 190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duitschaever, C. L., Arnott, D. R. & Bullock, D. H. 1972 Quality evaluation of yogurt produced commercially in Ontario. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 35 173–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galesloot, Th.E. 1958 Investigations concerning the consistency of yoghurt. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 12 130–165Google Scholar
Galesloot, Th.E., Hassing, F. & Veringa, H. A. 1968 Symbiosis in yoghurt (1). Stimulation of Lactobacillus bulgaricus by a factor produced by Streptococcus thermophilus. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 22 50–63Google Scholar
Göhner, F., Palo, V. & Bertan, M. 1968 [Changes in the content of volatile substances during ripening of yoghurt.] Milchwissenschaft 23 94–100Google Scholar
Görner, F., Palo, V. & Seginova, M. 1973 [Simulation of yoghurt flavour and aroma.] Zbornik prednášok z II. Sympózia o aromatickách látkach v pošivatinách 124–130 {Dairy Science Abstracts 37, 494)Google Scholar
Groux, M. 1973 Study on the components of yoghurt flabour. Lail 53 146–153Google Scholar
De Haast, J., Lategan, P. M. & Novello, J. C. 1979 Some aspects of yoghurt quality a review. South African Journal of Dairy Technology 11 11–15Google Scholar
Hamdan, I. Y., Kunsman, J. E. Jr & Deane, D. D. 1971 Acetaldehyde production by combined yoghurt cultures. Journal of Dairy Science 54 1080–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. A., Jones-Mortimer, M. C. & Quayle, J. R. 1964 Use of a purified bacterial formate dehydrogenase for the micro-estimation of formate. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 89 351–353Google ScholarPubMed
Kosikowski, F. V. 1977 Cheese and Fermented Milk Foods 2nd Ed. Michigan: Edwards Brothers.Google Scholar
Kroger, M. 1973 Controlling the quality of yoghurt. Dairy & Ice Cream Field 156 (1) 38–39, 61, 66–67Google Scholar
Kroger, M. 1976 Quality of yoghurt. Journal of Dairy Science 59 344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroger, M. & Weaver, J. C. 1973 Confusion about yogurt – compositional and otherwise. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 36 388–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, V. M. E. & Mabbitt, L. A. 1980 The use of single starter organisms for yoghurt manufacture. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 33 129–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pette, J. W. & Lolkema, H. 1950 a Yoghurt I. Symbiosis and antibiosis in mixed cultures of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 4 197–208Google Scholar
Pette, J. W. & Lolkema, H. 1950 b Yoghurt II. Growth stimulating factors for Streptococcus thermophilus. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 4 209–224Google Scholar
Robinson, R. K. & Tamime, A. Y. 1976 Quality appraisal of yoghurt. Journalof the Society of Dairy Technology 29 148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. K., Tamime, A. Y. & Chubb, L. W. 1977 Acetaldehyde as an indicator of flavour intensity in yogurt. Milk Industry 79 (4) 4–6Google Scholar
Schulz, M. E. & Voss, E. 1956 [Keeping quality of yoghurt.] Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte 8 1–9Google Scholar
Shankar, P. A. 1977 Interrelationships of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Veringa, H. A. & Schrijver-Davelaar, H. 1970 Enzymatic determination of acetaldehyde in starter, yoghurt and butter. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 24 34–44Google Scholar
Veringa, H. A., Galesloot, Th.E & Davelaar, H. 1968 Symbiosis in yoghurt (II). Isolation and identification of a growth factor for Lactobacillus bulgaricus produced by Streptococcus thermophilus. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 22 114–120Google Scholar