Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T04:53:56.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urea and phosphate supplemented molassed sugar-beet pulp nuts used as a major component of milk production concentrates for dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. J. Parkins
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
G. Fishwick
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
N. S. Ritchie
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
R. G. Hemingway
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Department, University of Glasgow, Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
R. Henderson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Unit of Statistics, University of Edinburgh

Summary

A cubed molassed sugar-beet pulp product containing about 3% urea and with added minerals and vitamins was evaluated in 2 continuous feeding trials over 8–10 weeks with cows in early lactation and which had previously been accustomed to receiving dietary urea. In one experiment 50% substitution of a cereal/vegetable protein mixture resulted in a depression in mean daily milk yield of about 0·8kg. In the second experiment, the concentrate contained about 30% dried distillers grains and in this case replacement of one-half with the supplemented molassed sugar-beet pulp product did not decrease milk yields. There were no significant effects on milk composition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1971). Nutrient Allowances and Composition of Feedingstuffs for Ruminants. Advisory Paper No. 11.Google Scholar
Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1972). Joint Conference on Nutrient Standards for Ruminants.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Trinder, N. (1966). Journal of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne Agricultural Society 20, 21.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. (1972). Journal of Agricultural Science 78, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1928). Bulletin of the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station No. 308.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1943). Journal of Dairy Science 26, 1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Hemingway, R. G. & Ritchie, N. S. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronning, M. & Bath, D. L. (1962). Journal of Dairy Science 45, 854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H., Nijkamp, H. J. & Vogt, J. E. (1971). Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 19, 48.Google Scholar