Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:10:26.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological properties of beneficial bacteria from the dairy environment and development of a fermented milk with the beneficial strain Lactobacillus casei MRUV6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

Monique Colombo ,
Svetoslav D. Todorov ,
Antonio F. Carvalho  and
Luís A. Nero
Monique Colombo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, InsPOA – Laboratório de Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil
Svetoslav D. Todorov
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, InsPOA – Laboratório de Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil Handong Global University, Pohang, Republic of Korea
Antonio F. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Departamento de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil
Luís A. Nero*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, InsPOA – Laboratório de Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Luís A. Nero, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this research paper we describe the technological properties of beneficial lactic acid bacteria (LAB) obtained from a dairy production chain and the development of a fermented milk produced with Lactobacillus casei MRUV6. Fifteen LAB isolates (Lactobacillus sp., Pediococcus sp. and Weissela sp.) presented acidifying abilities (pH ranges from 0.73 to 2.11), were able to produce diacetyl (except by 5 isolates) and exopolysaccharides, and two were proteolytic. L. casei MRUV6 was selected for producing a fermented milk, stored up to 35 d at 4 and 10°C. Counts on MRS agar with added vancomycin (10 mg/l) and MRS agar with added bile salts (1.5% w/v) ranged from 9.7 to 9.9 log CFU/g, independently of the tested conditions, indicating stability and intestinal resistance of L. casei MRUV6, despite some significant differences (P < 0.05). The study demonstrated the technological potential of a potential probiotic candidate strain, L. casei MRUV6, to be used as a starter culture in the dairy industry.

Keywords

Beneficialbile saltsfermented milkLactobacillus casei
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 259 - 262
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Begley, M, Gahan, CGM and Hill, C (2005) The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 29, 625–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, S and Winter, CK (2015) Diacetyl in foods: a review of safety and sensory characteristics. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 14, 634–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogan, TM (1996) History and taxonomy of starter cultures. In Cogan, TM and Accolas, JP (eds), Dairy Starter Cultures. John Wiley and Sons Inc: New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Colombo, M, Oliveira, AEZ, Carvalho, AF and Nero, LA (2014) Development of an alternative culture medium for the selective enumeration of Lactobacillus casei in fermented milk. Food Microbiology 39, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, M, Castilho, NPA, Todorov, SD and Nero, LA (2018 a) Beneficial properties of lactic acid bacteria naturally present in dairy production. BMC Microbiology 18, 219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, M, Todorov, SD, Eller, M and Nero, LA (2018 b) The potential use of probiotic and beneficial bacteria in the Brazilian dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Research 85, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, M, Nero, LA and Todorov, SD (2020) Safety profiles of beneficial lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy systems. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. in press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-020-00227-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dal Bello, B, Cocolin, L, Zeppa, G, Field, D, Cotter, PD and Hill, C (2012) Technological characterization of bacteriocin producing Lactococcus lactis strains employed to control Listeria monocytogenes in Cottage cheese. International Journal of Food Microbiology 153, 58–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado, S, Leite, AMO, Ruas-Madiedo, P and Mayo, B (2015) Probiotic and technological properties of Lactobacillus spp. strains from the human stomach in the search for potential candidates against gastric microbial dysbiosis. Frontiers in Microbiology 5, 766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO/WHO (2002) Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. In Editor (ed.), Book Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food, vol. 1. Series Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Joint FAO/WHO: London Ontario, Canada, p. 11.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (2006) Health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation. FAO Food and Nutrition, Rome Paper 85.Google Scholar
Franciosi, E, Settanni, L, Cavazza, A and Poznanski, E (2009) Biodiversity and technological potential of wild lactic acid bacteria from raw cows’ milk. International Dairy Journal 19, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueimonde, M, Sánchez, B, de los Reyes-Gavilán, C and Margolles, A (2013) Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology 4, 202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, D, Sugrue, I, Tobin, C, Hill, C, Stanton, C and Ross, RP (2018) The Lactobacillus casei group: history and health related applications. Frontiers in Microbiology 9, 2107–2107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, KGDC, Kruger, MF, Behrens, J, Destro, MT, Landgraf, M and Franco, BDGM (2009) Evaluation of culture media for enumeration of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium animalis in the presence of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus. LWT – Food Science and Technology 42, 491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani-López, E, Palou, E and López-Malo, A (2014) Probiotic viability and storage stability of yogurts and fermented milks prepared with several mixtures of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 2578–2590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masood, MI, Qadir, MI, Shirazi, JH and Khan, IU (2011) Beneficial effects of lactic acid bacteria on human beings. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 37, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, RO, Neto, GG, Freitas, R, Carvalho, AF and Nero, LA (2011) Enumeration of bifidobacteria using Petrifilm™ AC in pure cultures and in a fermented milk manufactured with a commercial culture of Streptococcus thermophilus. Food Microbiology 28, 1509–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadi, R, Sohrabvandi, S and Mohammad Mortazavian, A (2012) The starter culture characteristics of probiotic microorganisms in fermented milks. Engineering in Life Sciences 12, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morandi, S, Brasca, M and Lodi, R (2011) Technological, phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of wild lactic acid bacteria involved in the production of Bitto PDO Italian cheese. Dairy Science & Technology 91, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndraha, N, Hsiao, H-I, Vlajic, J, Yang, M-F and Lin, H-TV (2018) Time-temperature abuse in the food cold chain: review of issues, challenges, and recommendations. Food Control 89, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouwehand, AC and Röytiö, H (2015) Probiotic fermented foods and health promotion. In Holzapfel, W (ed.), Advances in Fermented Foods and Beverages. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pingitore, EV, Todorov, SD, Sesma, F and Franco, BDGM (2012) Application of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus mundtii CRL35 and Enterococcus faecium ST88Ch in the control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh Minas cheese. Food Microbiology 32, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, L, Margolles, A and Sánchez, B (2013) Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Frontiers in Microbiology 4, 396–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, ME, Akkermans, LMA, Haller, D, Hammerman, C, Heimbach, J, Hörmannsperger, G, Huys, G, Levy, DD, Lutgendorff, F, Mack, D, Phothirath, P, Solano-Aguilar, G and Vaughan, E (2010) Safety assessment of probiotics for human use. Gut Microbes 1, 164–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarvari, F, Mortazavian, AM and Fazei, MR (2014) Biochemical characteristics and viability of probiotic and yogurt bacteria in yogurt during the fermentation and refrigerated storage. Applied Food Biotechnology 1, 7.Google Scholar
Scott, KP, Duncan, SH, Louis, P and Flint, HJ (2011) Nutritional influences on the gut microbiota and the consequences for gastrointestinal health. Biochemical Society Transactions 39, 1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamine, AY and Robinson, RK (2007) Tamime and Robinson's Yoghurt. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valero, A, Carrasco, E and García-Gimeno, RM (2012) Principles and methodologies for the determination of shelf-life in foods. In Eissa, AA (ed.), Trends in Vital Food and Control Engineering, vol. 1. IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Vieco-Saiz, N, Belguesmia, Y, Raspoet, R, Auclair, E, Gancel, F, Kempf, I and Drider, D (2019) Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters during food-animal production. Frontiers in Microbiology 10, 57–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassenaar, TM and Klein, G (2008) Safety aspects and implications of regulation of probiotic bacteria in food and food supplements. Journal of Food Protection 71, 1734–1741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, WY, Wu, RN, Sun, ZH, Sun, TS, Meng, H and Zhang, HP (2009) Molecular cloning and characterization of bile salt hydrolase in Lactobacillus casei Zhang. Annals of Microbiology 59, 721–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar