Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:40:25.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The susceptibility of milked and unmilked udder quarters to intra-mammary infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Carol L. Thomas
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
F. K. Neave
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
T. M. Higgs
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

The teats of quarters which were milked, and those in which milking had ceased, of 16 cows were exposed to bacteria twice daily for 2 weeks by dipping them in a suspension of streptococci and staphylococci.

Of 32 quarters in which milking had ceased 22 became infected in this period. Eighteen infections were with Streptococcus dysgalactiae, 2 with Streptococcus uberis, 1 with Staphylococcus aureus and 2 with organisms not used in the culture. Only 3 of 32 milked quarters became infected in the experimental period: 2 infections were with Str. aureus and 1 with an organism not used in the culture. Animals differed in their susceptibility to infection.

Quarters which had been unmilked for 2 weeks were as susceptible to new infectionas those in which milking had just ceased.

In this experiment, factors such as intramammary pressure, leakage of milk, concentration of bacterial inhibitors, composition of secretion and cell counts of the secretion did not appear to influence the rate of infection. Yield at drying-off, milking rates and teat patency were not related to the differences in susceptibility between animals. It is suggested that the main reason for the lower new infection rate in the milked quarters is that pathogens entering the streak canal or teat sinus are usually flushed out with the secretion during milking and do not cause infection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

British Standards Institution (1968). Code of Practice CP 3007.Google Scholar
Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 240.Google Scholar
Glover, F. A., Dodd, F. H. & Thomas, C. L. (1969). Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy. 1968, 62.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M. & Stuart, O. M. (1954). Cornell Vet. 44, 501.Google Scholar
Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H. & Henriques, E. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, F. K. & Oliver, J. (1962). J. Dairy Res. 29, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, F. K., Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H. & Higgs, T. M. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 127.Google Scholar
Newbould, F. H. S. & Neave, F. K. (1965). J. Dairy Res. 32, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, J. F. (1967). Anim. Prod. Div. Res. Rep. An Foras Taluntais, p. 157.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. (1956 a). J. Dairy Res. 23, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. (1956 b). J. Dairy Res. 23, 204.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. (1956 c). J. Dairy Res. 23, 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. S. M., Whiteman, D. P. & Walker, H. T. M. (1969). N.Z. vet. J. 17, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, S. C. & Breed, R. S. (1910). J. infect. Dis. 7, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, B. & Oram, J. D. (1967). Nature, Lond. 216, 328.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1967). Ph.D. Thesis Univ. of Reading, p. 93.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Brander, G. C. (1968). Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy. 1967, 84.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H. & Brander, G. C. (1966). Vet. Rec. 79, 233.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Westgarth, D. R., Jones, M. R., Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H. & Brander, G. C. (1967). Vet. Rec. 81, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Wheelock, J. V. & Dodd, F. H. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F. & Dodd, F. H. (1965). J. Dairy Res. 32, 79.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Smith, A. & Dodd, F. H. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 151.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Smith, A., Dodd, F. H. & Lyster, R. L. J. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 1.Google Scholar