Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:07:19.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of buffalo casein micelles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Nripendra C. Ganguli
Nripendra C. Ganguli
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Buffalo skim-milk is less heat stable than cow skim-milk. Interchanging ultracentrifugal whey (UCW) and milk diffusate with micellar casein caused significant changes in the heat stability of buffalo casein micelles (BCM) and cow casein micelles (CCM). Buffalo UCW dramatically destabilized COM, whereas buffalo diffu-sate with CCM exhibited the highest heat stability.

Cow κ-casein stabilizes αs-casein against precipitation by Ca better than buffalo º-casein. About 90% of αs-casein could be stabilized by κ: αs ratios of 0·20 and 0·231 for cow and buffalo, respectively.

Sialic acid release from micellar κ-casein by rennet was higher than from acid κ-casein in both buffalo and cow caseins, the release being slower in buffalo. The released macropeptide from buffalo κ-casein was smaller than that from cow κ-casein as revealed by Sephadex gel filtration.

Sub-units of BCM have less sialic acid (1·57mg/g) than whole micelles (2·70mg/g). On rennet action, 47% of bound sialic acid was released from sub-units as against 85% from whole micelles. The sub-micelles are less heat stable than whole micelles. Among ions tested, added Ca reduced heat stability more dramatically in whole micelles, whereas added phosphate improved the stability of micelles and, more strikingly, of sub-micelles. Citrate also improved the heat stability of sub-micelles but not of whole micelles.

Type
Section E. Applied aspects of milk protein research
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Symposium on the Physics and Chemistry of Milk Proteins , April 1979 , pp. 401 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1962). Journal of Dairy Research 29, 285.Google Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Hoynes, M. C. T. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 427.Google Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Morrissey, P. A. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganguli, N. C. (1973). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 27, 258.Google Scholar
Ganguli, N. C. (1974). 19th International Dairy Congress 2, B. 5(c)Google Scholar
Ganguli, N. C. (1978). Indian Dairyman 30, 165.Google Scholar
Ganguli, N. C. & Majumder, G. C. (1967). Indian Journal of Biochemistry 4, 232.Google Scholar
Gupta, S. K. & Ganguli, N. C. (1965). Indian Journal of Biochemistry 2, 253.Google Scholar
Jairam, B. T., Vijayalakshmi, B. T., Balakrishnan, C. R., Nair, K. G. S. & Nair, P. G. (1976). Indian Journal of Dairy Science 29, 222.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, B. (1963). Dairy Science Abstracts 25, 257, 299.Google Scholar
McKenzie, H. A. (1970). Milk Proteins, vol. I. NEW York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, R. W. & Waugh, R. F. (1965). Journal of American Chemical Society 87, 2236.Google Scholar
Rose, D. (1963). Dairy Science Abstracts 25, 45.Google Scholar
Sabarwal, P. K. & Ganguli, N. C. (1968). Milchwissenschft 23, 686.Google Scholar
Sabarwal, P. K. & Ganguli, N. C. (1973). Milchwissenschaft 28, 774Google Scholar
Sabarwal, P. K. & Ganguli, N. C. (1974). Milchwissenschaft 29, 726.Google Scholar
Sabarwal, P. K. & Ganguli, N. C. (1977). Milchwissenschaft 32, 202.Google Scholar
Sabarwal, P. K., Oommen, S. & Ganguli, N. C. (1972). Journal of Food Science and Technology 9, 144.Google Scholar
Sawyer, W. H. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. & Buchheim, W. (1975). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 29, 17.Google Scholar
Schultz, B. C. & Bloomfield, V. A. (1976). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 173, 18.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. & Ganguli, N. C. (1976). Journal of Food Science and Technology 13, 334.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. & Ganguli, N. C. (1977). Indian Journal of Dairy Science 30, 78.Google Scholar
Whitney, R. McL., Brunner, J. R., Ebner, K. E., Farrell, H. M., Josephson, R. V., Morr, C. V. & Swaisgood, H. E. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittle, C. A. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 706.Google Scholar