Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:42:25.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Skin surface temperature of the mammary gland, measured by infrared thermography, in primiparous Girolando cows fed diets containing different lipid sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2020

Alysson M. Wanderley
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande79.074-460, Brazil
Luís C. V. Ítavo*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande79.074-460, Brazil
Geraldo T. dos Santos
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande79.074-460, Brazil
Camila C. B. F. Ítavo
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande79.074-460, Brazil
Alexandre M. Dias
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande79.074-460, Brazil
Rodrigo G. Mateus
Affiliation:
Catholic University Don Bosco, Campo Grande79.117-010, Brazil
Luiz C. Pereira
Affiliation:
University of the State of Mato Grosso, Juara78.575-000, Brazil
Ariadne B. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Catholic University Don Bosco, Campo Grande79.117-010, Brazil
Endyara S. Kohl
Affiliation:
Catholic University Don Bosco, Campo Grande79.117-010, Brazil
Celso R. C. Lima
Affiliation:
Catholic University Don Bosco, Campo Grande79.117-010, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Luís C. V. Ítavo, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This research communication describes the influence of diet, mammary quarter position and milking process on the temperature of teats and udder of cows fed diets containing different lipid sources. Five primiparous cows were fed diets containing cottonseed, sunflower seed, soybeans or soybean oil as a source of lipids and a reference diet without the inclusion of lipid sources in a 5 × 5 Latin Square design. Milk yield was determined in the last five days of each period. Milk samples were collected for SCC analysis on the last two days of each experimental period. The images of the mammary gland were obtained using an infrared camera and were analyzed with appropriate computer software. Milk yield was 14.8% higher for cows fed soybeans as a source of lipids. Diets and somatic cell counts did not influence the temperature of teats and udder. The milking process reduced the temperature of teats and udder by 0.79°C. Rear teats and rear quarters had higher surface temperatures than front teats and fore quarters. Changes in temperature of teats and mammary quarters occurred as a function of the milking process and quarter position. However, the diet and the SCC did not influence the temperature of teats and mammary quarters in this experiment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canaza-Cayo, AW, Lopes, PS, Cobuci, J, Martins, MF and Silva, MVGB (2017) Genetic parameters of milk production and reproduction traits of Girolando cattle in Brazil. Italian Journal of Animal Science 16, 19.Google Scholar
Cunningham, JG (2014) Treaty of Veterinary Physiology, Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, p. 624.Google Scholar
Daltro, DS, Fischer, V, Alfonzo, EPM, Stumpf, M, Kolling, GJ, Silva, MVGB and McManus, C (2017) Infrared thermography as a method for evaluating the heat tolerance in dairy cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 45, 374383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, R, Sailo, L, Verma, N, Bharti, P, Saikia, J, Imtiwati, P and Kumar, R (2016) Impact of heat stress on health and performance of dairy animals: a review. Veterinary World 9, 260268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Digiacomo, K, Marett, LC, Wales, WJ, Hayes, BJ, Dunshea, FR and Leury, BJ (2014) Thermoregulatory differences in lacting dairy cattle classed as eficiente or inefficiente based on residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 54, 18771881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammami, H, Vandenplas, J, Vanrobays, ML, Rekik, B, Bastin, C and Gengler, N (2015) Genetic analysis of heat stress effects on yield traits, udder health and fat acid of Walloon Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 49564968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanusová, J, Gálok, R, Bodo, S, Kunc, P, Knizková, I and Staronová, L (2016) Analysis of quality milking by thermographic method. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 64, 11491153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leão, JM, Lima, JAM, Pôssas, FP and Pereira, LGR (2015) Use of infrared thermography in precision livestock. Cadernos Técnicos de Veterinária e Zootecnia 79, 97109.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y, Nassary, NA, Fukuyama, K and Kobayashi, I (2016) Measurement of udder surface temperature in cows using infrared thermometer. In Zin T, Lin JW, Pan JS, Tin P and Yokota M (eds), Genetic and Evolutionary Computing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, p. 429.Google Scholar
NRC (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev Edn. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 408p.Google Scholar
Pantoja, JCF, Hullang, C and Ruegg, P (2009) Somatica cell count status across the dry period as a risk factor for the development of clinical mastitis in the subsequent lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberto, JVB, Souza, BB, Furtado, DA, Delfino, LJB and Marques, BAA (2014) Thermal gradients and physiological responses of goats in the Brazilian semiarid region using infrared thermography. Journal of Animal Behaviour Biometeorology 2, 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellier, N, Guettier, E and Staub, C (2014) A review of methods to measure animal body temperature in precision farming. Journal Agricultural Science and Technology 2, 7499.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wanderley et al. Supplementary Materials

Wanderley et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Wanderley et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 373.9 KB