Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:39:34.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal variations of copper and iron in Irish milk and butter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. J. Murphy
Affiliation:
†National Dairy Research Centre, The Agricultural Institute, Fermoy, Irish Republic
D. R. Headon
Affiliation:
†National Dairy Research Centre, The Agricultural Institute, Fermoy, Irish Republic
W. K. Downey
Affiliation:
‡Department of Biochemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic

Summary

Levels of Cu and Fe in fresh milk and in bulk pasteurized milk were measured. The endogenous levels varied during the lactation period. The level of Cu in bulk pasteurized milk was greater than the endogenous level, suggesting some contamination. This apparent Cu contamination was greater in winter than in summer. No similar contamination was observed with Fe. The levels of Cu and Fe in butter manufactured each month and in retail butter were measured. Higher levels of Cu were detected in ripened cream butter produced in winter compared to that produced in summer. No similar trend was evident for Fe in ripened cream butter. Very low levels of Cu, Fe and lipid oxidation were detected in Irish sweet cream butter and consequently Cu and Fe contamination and resultant oxidation are not a problem in this product.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Downey, W. K. & Murphy, M. F. (1968). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 21, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, G. L. (1966). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 21, 74.Google Scholar
Jonsson, H. (1976). Milchwissenschaft 31, 210.Google Scholar
Julien, J. P. & Martin, G. (1952). Canadian Dairy and Ice Cream Journal 31, 36.Google Scholar
Koops, J. (1963). Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Kruisheer, C. I. & Krol, B. M. (1956). International Dairy Congress 2, 194.Google Scholar
Loftus Hills, G. & Thiel, C. C. (1946). Journal of Dairy Research 14, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luecke, B. W., Duncan, C. W. & Ely, R. E. (1947). Archives of Biochemistry 13, 277.Google Scholar
Maloney, P. & Armstrong, J. G. (1969). Canadian Institute of Food Technology Journal 2, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, J. W. (1961). Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Meyknecht, E. A. M. & van Dam, B. (1959). 15th International Dairy Congress, London 2, 1108.Google Scholar
Mulder, H., Kruisheer, C. I., Herder, P. C. den & Ginkel, J. G. van (1949).Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 3, 37.Google Scholar
Mulder, H., Menger, J. W. & Meijers, P. (1964). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 18, 52.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. F. & Downey, W. K. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, G. K. & Rhea, U. S. (1971). Journal of Dairy Science 54, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, J. M. (1974). M.Sc. Thesis, University College, Cork.Google Scholar
O'Connor, H. F. & Grimes, M. (1955). Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Republic of Ireland 51, 72.Google Scholar
Pont, E. G. & Rogers, W. P. (1962). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 17, 173.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. & Pont, E. G. (1965). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 20, 200.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, E. G. (1966). Milchwissenschaft 21, 31.Google Scholar
Tolle, A., Heesohen, W., Bluthgen, A., Hamman, J. & Reichmuch, J. (1971). Ruchstande von Biozidin und Umweltchemikalien in der Milch. Institut für Hygiene der Bundesanstalt für Milchforschung, Kiel.Google Scholar
van Duin, H. (1974). FIL/IDF, A-Doc 17, Brussels.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. P. & Downey, W. K. (1971). Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 139.Google Scholar
Willis, J. B. (1964). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 19, 70.Google Scholar