Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:24:47.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative importance of pre-partum and post-partum factors in the control of milk yield in the guinea-pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Stephen R. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics, LE12 5RD
T. Ben Mepham
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics, LE12 5RD
Kathryn J. Lock
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Environmental Studies, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics, LE12 5RD

Summary

Examination of data pertaining to milk yield and litter growth rate of guinea-pigs at peak lactation showed that milk yield increased with increasing number of pups carried by the dam during pregnancy and also with increasing maternal weight. There was a significant linear correlation (P < 0.05) of mammary gland weight (expressed per unit of maternal body weight) with litter size. Increasing litter size, within 18 h of parturition, from 1 pup to 5 pups did not elicit a response in milk yield. Decreasing litter size from 5 pups to 1 pup reduced milk yield to the level expected of a monotocous dam. Data are presented showing the ability of the guinea-pig pup to survive from birth without access to milk and the inadequacy of milk supply to meet litter requirements when the litter size is more than 2 pups. The mechanisms controlling lactation in the guinea-pig are discussed in relation to data obtained in other species.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, G. & Davies, H. L. (1959). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. R. (1975). Journal of Animal Science 41, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, N. (1957). Journal of Agricultural Science 49, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1961). In Milk: The Mammary Gland and its Secretion, vol. 2, p. 305. (Eds Kon, S. K. and Cowie, A. T..) London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, H. M. (1961). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 2, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloninger, W. H. & Thoele, H. W. (1957). Journal of Dairy Science 40, 630.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. T. (1969). Journal of Endocrinology 44, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. R. & Mepham, T. B. (1974). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 59, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, P., McKeown, T. & Record, R. G. (1955). Journal of Endocrinology 12, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1947). Journal of Agricultural Science 37, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handweroer, S., Crenshaw, C. Jr, Maurer, W. F., Barrett, J., Hurley, T. W., Golander, A. & Fellows, R. E. (1977). Journal of Endocrinology 72, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. A., Tsushima, T., Shiu, R. P. C. & Friesen, H. G. (1976). Endocrinology 99, 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzell, J. L. (1972). Dairy Science Abstracts 34, 351.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. & Beck, N. F. G. (1973). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 45 A, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagasawa, H., & Naito, M. (1963). Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 34, 174.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. L., Heytler, P. G. & Ciaccio, E. I. (1962). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 109, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peaker, M., Jones, C. D. R., Goode, J. A. & Linzell, J. L. (1975). Journal of Endocrinology 67, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Garrett, W. N., East, N. E. & Hinman, N. (1974). Journal of Animal Science 38, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, R. R. & Donker, J. D. (1965). Journal of Dairy Science 48, 978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. C. (1956). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 60, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. (1975). Animal Production 20, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar