Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:22:53.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence of intramammary infection in Dutch dairy herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Otlis Sampimon ,
Herman W Barkema ,
Inge Berends ,
Jan Sol  and
Theo Lam
Otlis Sampimon*
Affiliation:
GD Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands
Herman W Barkema
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Inge Berends
Affiliation:
GD Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands
Jan Sol
Affiliation:
GD Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands
Theo Lam
Affiliation:
GD Animal Health Service, Deventer, The Netherlands Dutch Udder Health Centre, Deventer, The Netherlands
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A survey was carried out in 2003 in 49 dairy herds to determine the overall and pathogen-specific prevalence of intramammary infection (IMI) in Dutch dairy herds, and to compare the distribution with four studies performed from 1973 to 1985 in The Netherlands. Herds were randomly selected stratified over the 12 Dutch provinces, had at least 40 lactating cows and participated in the Dutch milk recording system. Quarter milk samples were collected from all 408 cows with a somatic cell count (SCC) ⩾250 000 cells/ml and 145 heifers with SCC ⩾150 000 cells/ml at the last milk test before the farm visit. Additionally, samples were collected from 519 (approximately 25%) of the remaining low-SCC cows and heifers with a SCC at the last milk test before the farm visit of <250 000 and <150 000 cells/ml, respectively. Bacterial growth occurred in 37·3% of milk samples of high-SCC cows and in 21·1% of low-SCC cows. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were the most frequently isolated group of bacteria (10·8% of quarters) and were found in all herds. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus IMI was lower in 2003 than in 1973, respectively 1·8% and 6·2% of quarters. Prevalence of Streptococcus uberis and Str. dysgalactiae IMI was almost the same in the five samplings during the 30-year period, at 1·1–1·7 and 0·9–1·5%, respectively. Str. agalactiae was not found in this study. Prevalence of CNS IMI was higher in lactating heifers, while prevalence of Str. uberis, Str. dysgalactiae and penicillin-resistant Staph. aureus IMI was higher in older cows. Because distribution of pathogens changes over time, herd-level samples for bacteriological culturing must be taken regularly to monitor udder health. Additionally, national mastitis prevalence studies give important information through monitoring the national udder health status.

Keywords

Intramammary infectionprevalencemastitisbovinedairy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 129 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJGM, Beiboer, ML, Benedictus, G & Brand, A 1998 Management practices associated with low, medium, and high somatic cell counts in bulk milk. Journal of Dairy Science 81 1917–1927CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJGM, Beiboer, ML, Wilmink, H, Benedictus, G & Brand, A 1999 Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82 1643–1654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH & Zadoks, RN 2006 Invited review: The role of cow, pathogen, and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 89 1877–1895CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, AJ & Green, MJ 2000 A study of the incidence and significance of intramammary enterobacterial infections acquired during the dry period. Journal of Dairy Science 83 1957–1965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, AJ, Leach, KA, Breen, JE, Green, LE & Green, MJ 2007 Survey of the incidence and aetiology of mastitis on dairy farms in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 160 253–258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, RN, Jasper, DE, Farver, TB, Bushnell, RB & Franti, CE 1988 Prevalence of udder infections and mastitis in 50 California dairy herds. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 193 323–328Google ScholarPubMed
Harmon, RJ, Eberhart, RJ, Jasper, DE, Langlois, BE & Wilson, RA 1990 Microbiological procedures for the diagnosis of udder infection. Arlington VA, USA: National Mastitis Council Inc.Google Scholar
Harmon, RJ 1994 Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 77 2103–2112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmon, RJ & Langlois, BE 1995 Mastitis due to coagulase-negative staphylococcus species. In: Proceedings 35th National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Fort Worth Texas, USA. pp. 56–67Google Scholar
Lam, TJGM, Lipman, LJA, Schukken, YH, Gaastra, W & Brand, A 1996 Epidemiological characteristics of bovine clinical mastitis caused by Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus studied by DNA fingerprinting. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57 39–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makovec, JA & Ruegg, PL 2003 Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. Journal of Dairy Science 86 3466–3472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myllys, V, Asplund, K, Brofeldt, E, Hirvelä-Koski, V, Honkanen-Buzalski, T, Junttila, J, Kulkas, L, Myllykangas, O, Niskanen, M, Saloniemi, H, Sandholm, M & Saranpää, T 1998 Bovine mastitis in Finland in 1988 and 1995 – changes in prevalence and antimicrobial resistance. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 39 119–126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neave, FK, Dodd, FH, Kingwill, RG & Westgarth, DR 1969 Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. Journal of Dairy Science 52 696–707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nightingale, C, Dhuyvetter, K, Mitchell, R & Schukken, Y 2008 Influence of variable milk quality premiums on observed milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1236–1244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olde Riekerink, RGM, Barkema, HW & Stryhn, H 2007 The effect of season on somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 90 1704–1715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Østerås, O, Sølverød, L & Reksen, O 2006 Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey – effects of season, parity, days in milk, resistance, and clustering. Journal of Dairy Science 89 1010–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkälä, A, Haveri, M, Pyörälä, S, Myllys, V & Honkanen-Buzalski, T 2004 Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001 – prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Dairy Science 87 2433–2441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, KJ & Greenland, S 1998 Modern Epidemiology, 2nd Edition. Philadelphia PA, USA: Lippincott-RavenGoogle Scholar
Sampimon, OC, Barkema, HW, Berends, IMGA, Sol, J, Lam, TJGM 2008 Prevalence and herd-level risk factors for intramammary infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in Dutch dairy herds. Veterinary Microbiology. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.010Google ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Wilson, DJ, Welcome, F, Tikofsky, L & Gonzalez, RN 2003 Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell count. Veterinary Research 34 579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, PM, Smith, BS, English, PB, Herer, PS & Gonzalez, RN 1990 Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 73 2785–2789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, J 2002 Cure of Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in Dutch dairy cows. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Tenhagen, BA, Koster, G, Wallmann, J & Heuwieser, W 2006 Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2542–2551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vecht, U, Wisselink, HJ & Defize, PR 1989 Dutch national mastitis survey. The effect of herd and animal factors on somatic cell count. Netherlands Milk Dairy Journal 43 425–435Google Scholar
Wilson, DJ, Gonzalez, RN & Das, HH 1997 Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 80 2592–2598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, RN, Allore, HG, Barkema, HW, Sampimon, OC, Wellenberg, GJ, Grohn, YT & Schukken, YH 2001 Cow- and quarter-level risk factors for Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2649–2663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, RN, Gillespie, BE, Barkema, HW, Sampimon, OC, Oliver, SP & Schukken, YH 2003 Clinical, epidemiological and molecular characteristics of Streptococcus uberis infections in dairy herds. Epidemiology and Infection 130 335–349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed