Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:54:39.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plasmin digest of κ-casein as a source of antibacterial peptides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2014

Marjaneh Sedaghati ,
Hamid Ezzatpanah ,
Masoud Mashhadi Akbar Boojar ,
Maryam Tajabadi Ebrahimi  and
Mehdi Aminafshar
Marjaneh Sedaghati
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Food Science and Technology, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Hamid Ezzatpanah*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Food Science and Technology, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Masoud Mashhadi Akbar Boojar
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Tajabadi Ebrahimi
Affiliation:
Department of Science, Faculty of Biology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Iran
Mehdi Aminafshar
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the antibacterial properties of plasmin, the plasmin hydrolysis of bovine κ-casein and the fractions (named κC1, κC2, κC3, κC4, and κC5) liberated from it using RP-HPLC. The target bacteria were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus (pathogenic), Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus (probiotic). Three peptides (kC1, kC3, and kC4) were found to have antibacterial activity, with κC3 peptide being the most active. The plasmin digest of bovine κ-casein proved to be stronger than any of its fractions in terms of antibacterial potential. Measurement of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) showed that Gram-positive bacteria are generally more sensitive to antibacterial activity than Gram-negative bacteria. The MIC of nisin, as a bacteriocin peptide, was also measured. The three antibacterial peptides were identified using LC-Mass. The molecular mass of kC1, kC3, and kC4 corresponded to the f(17–21), f(22–24), and f(1–3) of bovine κ-casein, respectively. It was also found that the positive charge and hydrophobicity of a peptide are not key factors in antibacterial activity. On the whole, the present study demonstrated that the plasmin digest of κ-casein has a high antibacterial potential and can be considered as a natural antibacterial agent in the food chain.

Keywords

Bovine milk proteinsκ-caseinantibacterial peptidesplasmin
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 245 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barzyk, W, Campagna, S, Wieclaw, K, Korchowiec, B & Rogalska, E 2009 The affinity of two antimicrobial peptides derived from bovine milk proteins for lipid membranes. Colloid Surface 343 104–110Google Scholar
Bastian, ED & Brown, RJ 1996 Plasmin in milk and dairy products: an update. International Dairy Journal 6 435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, W, Takase, M, Yamauchi, K, Wakabayashi, H, Kawase, K & Tomita, M 1992 Identification of the bactericidal domain of lactoferrin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1121 130–136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, KL & Hancock, REW 2006 Cationic host defence (antimicrobial) peptides. Current Opinion in Immunology 18 24–30Google Scholar
Dalasgaard, TK, Heegaard, CW & Larsen, LB 2008 Plasmin digestion of photooxidized milk proteins. Journal of Dairy Science 91 2175–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danicik, V, Addona, TA, Clauser, KR, Vath, JE & Pevzner, PA 1999 De novo peptide equencing via tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Computational Biology 6 327–342Google Scholar
Eigel, WN 1977 Effect of bovine plasmin on αS1-B and κ-A caseins. Journal of Dairy Science 60 1399–1403Google Scholar
Epand, RM & Vogel, HG 1999 Diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their mechanisms of action. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1462 11–28Google Scholar
Fox, PF 1991 Food Enzymology. New York: Elsevier Applied ScienceGoogle Scholar
Hancock, REW & Lehrer, R 1998 Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends in Biotechnology 16 82–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heike, B & Sahl, HG 2000 New insights in to the mechanism of action of lantibiotics-diverse biological effects by binding to the same molecular target. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 46 1–6Google Scholar
Jay, JM 2000 Modern Food Microbiology. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers IncGoogle Scholar
Josan, JS, Vagner, J, Handl, HL, Sankaranarayanan, R, Gillies, RJ & Hruby, VJ 2008 Solid-Phase synthesis of heterobivalent ligands targeted to melanocortin and cholecystokinin receptors. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 14 293–300Google Scholar
Lahov, E & Regelson, W 1996 Antibacterial and immunostimulating casein-derived substances from milk: casecidin, isracidin peptides. Food and Chemical Toxicology 34 131–145Google Scholar
Lahov, E, Edelsten, D, Sode-Mogensen, MT & Sofer, E 1971 Properties of basic glycopeptides from cow milk protein by heat. Milchwissenschaft 26 489–495Google Scholar
Liepke, C, Zucht, HD, Forsmann, WG & Standker, L 2001 Purification of novel peptide antibiotics from human milk. Journal of Chromatography 752 369–377Google Scholar
López-Expósito, I, Minervini, F, Amigo, L & Recio, I 2006 Identification of antibacterial peptides from bovine κ-casein. Journal of Food Protection 6 2992–2997Google Scholar
Malkoski, M, Dashper, SG, O'Brien-Simpson, NM, Talbo, GH, Macris, M, Cross, KJ & Reynolds, EC 2001 Kappacin, a novel antimicrobial peptide from bovine milk. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45 2309–2315Google Scholar
Martinez, B, Obeso, JM, Rodriquez, A & Garcia, P 2008 Nisin-bacteriophage crossresistance in Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Food Microbiolog 122 253–258Google Scholar
Matin, MA, Monnai, M & Otani, H 2000 Isolation and characterization of a cytotoxic pentapeptide κ-casecidin from bovine κ-casein digested with bovine trypsin. Animal Science Journal 71 197–207Google Scholar
McCann, KB, Shiell, BJ, Michalski, WP, Lee, A, Wan, J, Roginski, H & Conventry, MJ 2005 Isolation and characterisation of antibacterial peptides derived from the f(164–207) region of bovine αS2-casein. International Dairy Journal 15 133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, KB, Shiell, BJ, Michalski, WP, Lee, A, Wan, J, Roginski, H & Coventry, MJ 2006 Isolation and characterization of a novel antibacterial peptide from bovine α S1-casein. International Dairy Journal 16 316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortazavian, AM & Sohrabvandi, S 2006 Probiotic products. In Probiotics and Food Probiotic Products Based on Dairy Probiotic Products, pp. 330–372 (Ed. Mortazavian, AM). Tehran: Eta PublicationGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, AJ 2006 Paneth cell α-defensins and synthesis and function. In Antimicrobial Peptides and Human Disease, pp. 1–25 (Ed. Schafer, WM). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Park, YW 2009 Overview of bioactive components in milk and dairy products. In Bioactive Components in Milk and Dairy Products, pp. 3–5 (Ed. Park, YW). Ames, Iowa, USA: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A, Thomas, U, Bramaz, N, Hunziker, P & von Fellenberg, R 1999 Isolation and identification of three bactericidal domains in the bovine α-lactalbumin molecule. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1426 439–448Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A, Dettling, C, Thomas, U & Hunziker, P 2001 Isolation and characterization of four bactericidal domains in the β-lactoglobulin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1526 131–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilar, G, Beatriz, M, Lorena, R & Ana, R 2010 Synergy between the phage endolysin LysH5 and nisin to kill Staphylococcus aureus in pasteurized milk. International Journal of Food Microbiology 141 151–155Google Scholar
Recio, I & Visser, S 1999 Identification of two distinct antibacterial domains within the sequence of bovine αS2-casein. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1428 314–326Google Scholar
Rutherford-Markwick, KJ & Moughan, PJ 2005 Bioactive peptides derived from food. Journal of AOAC International 88 955–966Google Scholar
Silva, SV & Malcata, FX 2005 Caseins as source of bioactive peptides. International Dairy Journal 15 1–15Google Scholar
Swaisgood, HE 1996 Characteristics of milk. In Food Chemistry, pp. 841–878 (Ed. Fennema, OR). NewYork: Marcel Dekker IncGoogle Scholar
Zhou, JS, Pillidge, CJ, Gopal, PK & Gill, HS 2005 Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. International Journal of Food Microbiolog 98 211–217Google Scholar
Zucht, HD, Raida, M, Adermann, K, Magert, HJ & Forssman, WG 1995 Casocidin-I: a casein-αS2 derived peptide exhibits antibacterial activity. FEBS Letters 372 185–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed