Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:35:01.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periodic omission of dairy cow milkings: II. Effect on the composition and processing properties of herd milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

L. F. Bailey ,
J. C. Radcliffe  and
A. F. Hehir
L. F. Bailey
Affiliation:
Northfield Research Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
J. C. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
Northfield Research Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
A. F. Hehir
Affiliation:
Northfield Research Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Forty-five Friesian cows were assigned to one of 3 milking management treatments: (1) cows milked 14 times weekly, (2) cows milked 13 times weekly (Wednesday morning milking omitted) and (3) cows milked 12 times weekly (Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning milkings omitted). The trial continued for 12 months.

Milking omission led to compositional changes in herd milk similar to those described for subclinical mastitis, including increases in pH, chloride level and cell count. Alterations in processing properties consistent with these changes were encountered. Heat stability and curd firmness were affected by extending the milking interval, but the magnitude and direction of the effects varied.

Where only one milking was omitted weekly, herd milk arriving at cheese or powdered-milk factories would not be expected to cause any serious technical difficulties. Omission of 2 consecutive milkings a week would cause processing difficulties where milk was to be condensed or dried, since the maximum heat stability obtained by pH adjustment was reduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 255 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. O., Hankinson, C. L., Plastridge, W. N. & Weirether, F. J. (1936). Bulletin of the Storrs (Connecticut) Agricultural Experiment Station. No. 211.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1963). B.S. no. 1741.Google Scholar
Feagan, J. T., Griffin, A. T. & Lloyd, G. T. (1966 a). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagan, J. T., Griffin, A. T. & Lloyd, G. T. (1966 b). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, J. (1934). Analyst 59, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hehir, A. F. (1968). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 23, 137.Google Scholar
Hehir, A. F. & Salter, P. N. (1966). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 21, 9.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1940). Paper prepared for 12th International Dairy Congress, Vienna (not held). (Cited by Wheelock & Rook, 1966.)Google Scholar
Lyster, R. L. J. & Wheelock, J. V. (1967). Journal of Dairy Research 34, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowall, F. H., Dolby, R. M. & McDowell, A. K. R. (1937). Journal of Dairy Research 8, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe, J. C. (1968). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 23, 143.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, J. C., Bailey, L. F. & Horne, M. L. (1973). Journal of Dairy Research 40, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallamy, P. T., Randolph, H. E. & Dill, C.W. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, R. C. & Doan, F. J. (1935). Journal of Dairy Science 18, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V. & Rook, J. A. F. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. C. D. & Davies, D. T. (1958 a). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. C. D. & Davies, D. T. (1958 b). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar