Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:53:14.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Periodic omission of dairy cow milkings: I. Effect on milk yield and composition and on udder health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. C. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
Northfield Research Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
L. F. Bailey
Affiliation:
Northfield Research Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
M. L. Horne
Affiliation:
Northfield Research Laboratories, Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001

Summary

Forty-five Friesian cows were assigned to one of 3 milking management treatments: (1) cows milked 14 times weekly, (2) cows milked 13 times weekly (Wednesday morning milking omitted), and (3) cows milked 12 times weekly (Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning milkings omitted). Cows were removed from the trial at the end of their lactations, and newly calved cows were added as they became available. The trial was continued for 12 months.

When one milking was omitted weekly, the total lactational milk yield was reduced by 3·5%, fat yield by 2% and protein yield by 1·5%. These reductions were not statistically significant. When 2 consecutive milkings were omitted, the yield of milk and of its main components was reduced by 14% (P < 0·001). The effects were greatest for highly productive cows in early lactation.

When one or 2 milkings were omitted the milk yield on the following day was nearly 50% greater than the mean daily yield. No increase in the incidence of subclinioal mastitis was observed in either milking omission treatment.

It is concluded that it is practicable to omit one milking each week though it is suggested that the technique should not be used in highly productive herds unless most of the cows are past the sixth week of lactation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Autrey, K. M., Rollins, G. H. & Cannon, R. Y. (1963). Journal of Dairy Science 46, 626.Google Scholar
Bailey, L. F., Radcliffe, J. C. & Hehir, A. F. (1973). Journal of Dairy Research 40, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claesson, O. (1962). Dairy Farmer 9 (9), 36.Google Scholar
Durney, G. E. (1970). Herd Testing Report 1969–1970. Adelaide: Department of Agriculture S. Australia.Google Scholar
Himmel, U. (1964). Archiv für Tierzucht 7, 445.Google Scholar
(Dairy Science Abstracts 27, 583.)Google Scholar
Natzke, R. P., Schultz, L. H., Barr, G. R. & Holtmann, W. B. (1965). Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, S. M. & Sørensen, A. N. (1970). 18th International Dairy Congress, Sydney 1 E, 606.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, J. C. (1968). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 23, 143.Google Scholar
Roguinsky, M. (1970). 18th International Dairy Congress, Sydney 1 E, 633.Google Scholar
Schalm, O. W. & Noorlander, D. O. (1957). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 130, 199.Google Scholar
Udy, D. C. (1963). Instructions for Using Plastic Bead Hydrometers for the Determination of Solids-not-fat in Milk. Boulder: Udy Analyser Co.Google Scholar