Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:31:43.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural variations in the average size of bovine casein micelles: II. Milk samples from creamery bulk silos in south west Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Carl Holt  and
D. Donald Muir
Carl Holt
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
D. Donald Muir
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Samples of bulk silo milk from 5 creameries in the south west of Scotland were taken over a 16-month period. The average radii of casein micelles were determined by measuring the wavelength dependence of the turbidity of skim-milk diluted with its own ultrafiltrate. In addition, the concentrations of casein, soluble and colloidal Ca and P1 were measured. The average size of casein micelles followed a pronounced seasonal trend with smaller average sizes in the summer compared to the winter period, confirming earlier observations made on milks from individual cows. The average size of casein micelles correlated positively (r = +0·777, P < 0·001) with the amount of colloidal P1 per unit weight of casein and negatively (r = −0·77, P < 0·001) with casein-bound Ca. Average micelle radius was negatively correlated with heat stability at the natural pH of milk (r = −0·61, P < 0·001), but there did not appear to be any causal relation between these 2 variables.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , October 1978 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davies, D. T. & Law, A. J. R. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decelles, G. A. Jr (1967). Dissertation Abstracts B 28, 1295.Google Scholar
de Koning, P. J., Koops, J. & Van Rooijen, P. J. (1974). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 28, 186.Google Scholar
Ford, T. F., Ramsdell, G. A. & Landsman, S. G. (1955). Journal of Dairy Science 38, 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. (1975). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 400, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. & Batrd, L. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. & Dalgleish, D. G. (1974). Report, Hannah Research Institute, p. 62.Google Scholar
Holt, C., Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C., Parker, T. G. & Dalgleish, D. G. (1975). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 400, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D., Davies, D. T. & Yaguchi, M. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. A., Fitzpatrick, M. M. & Stanton, E. K. (1959). Nature, London 183, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. P., Boswell, R. T., Martin, V., Jennkss, R. & Kiddy, C. A. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. (1971). In Milk Proteins, vol. 2, p. 3. (Ed. McKenzie, H. A..) London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar