Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:11:59.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

N-acetyl -β-D-glucosaminidase activity in cow milk as an indicator of mastitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2016

Mari Hovinen ,
Heli Simojoki ,
Reeta Pösö ,
Jenni Suolaniemi ,
Piret Kalmus ,
Leena Suojala  and
Satu Pyörälä
Mari Hovinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Heli Simojoki
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Reeta Pösö
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Jenni Suolaniemi
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Piret Kalmus
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Estonia
Leena Suojala
Affiliation:
Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners MTK, Helsinki, Finland
Satu Pyörälä
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Activity of lysosomal N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAGase) in milk has been used as an indicator of bovine mastitis. We studied NAGase activity of 808 milk samples from healthy quarters and quarters of cows with spontaneous subclinical and clinical mastitis. Associations between milk NAGase activity and milk somatic cell count (SCC), mastitis causing pathogen, quarter, parity, days in milk (DIM) and season were studied. In addition, the performance of NAGase activity in detecting clinical and subclinical mastitis and distinguishing infections caused by minor and major bacteria was investigated. Our results indicate that NAGase activity can be used to detect both subclinical and clinical mastitis with a high level of accuracy (0·85 and 0·99). Incomplete correlation between NAGase activity and SCC suggests that a substantial proportion of NAGase activity comes from damaged epithelial cells of the udder in addition to somatic cells. We therefore recommend determination of NAGase activity from quarter foremilk after at least six hours from the last milking using the method described. Samples should be frozen before analysis. NAGase activity should be interpreted according to DIM, at least during the first month of lactation. Based on the results of the present study, a reference value for normal milk NAGase activity of 0·1–1·04 pmoles 4-MU/min/μl for cows with ≥30 DIM (196 samples) could be proposed. We consider milk NAGase activity to be an accurate indicator of subclinical and clinical mastitis.

Keywords

N-acetyl -β-d-glucosaminidasecow milkindicator of mastitis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 219 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkerstedt, M, Forsbäck, L, Larsen, T & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2011 Natural variation in biomarkers indicating mastitis in healthy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 78 88–96Google Scholar
Bansal, BK, Hamann, J, Gabrowskit, NT & Singh, KB 2005 Variation in the composition of selected milk fraction samples from healthy and mastitic quarters, and its significance for mastitis diagnosis. Journal of Dairy Research 72 144–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berning, LM & Shook, GE 1992 Prediction of mastitis using milk somatic cell count, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, and lactose. Journal of Dairy Science 75 1840–1848Google Scholar
Chagunda, MGG, Larsen, T, Bjerring, M & Ingvartsen, KL 2006a L-lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activities in bovine milk as indicators of non-specific mastitis. Journal of Dairy Research 73 431–440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagunda, MGG, Friggens, NC, Rasmussen, MD & Larsen, T 2006b A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2980–2998Google Scholar
Emanuelson, U, Olsson, T, Holmberg, O, Hageltorn, M, Mattila, T, Nelson, L & Åström, G 1987 Comparison of some screening tests for detecting mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 70 880–887Google Scholar
Fox, LK, Shook, GE & Schultz, LH 1985 Factors related to milk loss in quarters with low somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 68 2100–2107Google Scholar
Fox, LK, Hancock, DD, McDonald, JS & Gaskins, CT 1988 N-acetyl- β-D-glucosaminidase activity in whole milk and milk fractions. Journal of Dairy Science 71 2915–2922CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halasa, T, Huijps, K, Osteras, O & Hogeveen, H 2007 Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management. Veterinary Quarterly 29 18–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, JS, Gonzalez, RN, Harmon, RJ, Nickerson, SC, Oliver, SP, Pankey, JW & Smith, KL 1999 Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis, 2nd edn.Madison, WI: National Mastitis CouncilGoogle Scholar
IDF 2011 Suggested interpretation of mastitis terminology. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 448. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
IDF 2013 Guidelines for the use and interpretation of bovine milk somatic cell counts (SCC) in the dairy industry. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 466. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy FederationGoogle Scholar
Kaartinen, L, Kuosa, PL, Veijalainen, K & Sandholm, M 1988 Compartmentalization of milk N-acetyl- β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase). Journal of Veterinary Medicine B 35 408–414Google Scholar
Kalmus, P, Simojoki, H, Pyorala, S, Taponen, S, Holopainen, J & Orro, T 2013 Milk haptoglobin, milk amyloid A, and N-acetyl- beta -d-glucosaminidase activity in bovines with naturally occurring clinical mastitis diagnosed with a quantitative PCR test. Journal of Dairy Science 96 3662–3670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, BJ, Middleton, G & Salmon, M 1978 Bovine milk N-acetyl- β-d-glucosaminidase and its significance in the detection of abnormal udder secretions. Journal of Dairy Research 45 15–20Google Scholar
Kitchen, BJ, Middleton, G, Durward, G, Andrews, RJ & Salmon, MC 1980 Mastitis diagnostic test to estimate mammary gland epithelial cell damage. Journal of Dairy Science 63 978–983Google Scholar
Klastrup, O & Schmidt Madsen, P 1974 Nordiske rekommendationer vedrøende mastitundesøgelser af kiertelprøver (Nordic recommendations for mastitis diagnostics of quarter milk samples). Nordic Veterinary Medicine 26 197–204Google Scholar
Larsen, T, Rontved, CM, Ingvartsen, KL, Vels, L & Bjerring, M 2010 Enzyme activity and acute phase proteins in milk utilized as indicators of acute clinical E. coli LPS-induced mastitis. Animal 4 1672–1679Google Scholar
Long, JS 1997 Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Mattila, T & Sandholm, M 1985 Antitrypsin and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase as markers of mastitis in a herd of Ayrshire cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 46 2453–2456Google Scholar
Mattila, T, Syväjärvi, J & Sandholm, M 1986 Milk antitrypsin, NAGase, plasmin and bacterial replication rate in whey – effects of lactation stage, parity and daily milk yield. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B 33 462–470Google Scholar
Miller, RH & Paape, MJ 1988 Effects of parity, bacteriological status, stage of lactation, and dry period on N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity of milk and dry secretion. Journal of Dairy Science 71 2508–2512Google Scholar
Nielsen, NI, Larsen, T, Bjerring, M & Ingvartsen, KL 2005 Quarter health, milking interval, and sampling time during milking affect the concentration of milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 88 3186–3200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, A-K, Persson Waller, K, Bennedsgaard, TW, Larsen, T & Emanuelson, U 2014 Associations of udder-health indicators with cow factors and with intramammary infection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97 5459–5473Google Scholar
Piccinini, R, Binda, E, Belotti, M, Daprà, V & Zecconi, A 2007 Evaluation of milk components during whole lactation in healthy quarters. Journal of Dairy Research 74 226–232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyörälä, S, Hovinen, M, Simojoki, H, Fitzpatrick, J, Eckersall, PD & Orro, T 2011 Acute phase proteins in naturally acquired mastitis caused by different pathogens. Veterinary Record 168 535–540CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suojala, L, Simojoki, H, Mustonen, K, Kaartinen, L & Pyörälä, S 2010 Efficacy of enrofloxacin in the treatment of naturally occurring acute clinical Escherichia coli mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 93 1960–1969Google Scholar
Urech, E, Puhan, Z & Schällibaum, M 1999 Changes in milk protein fraction as affected by subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2402–2411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welbeck, K, Leonard, P, Gilmartin, N, Byrne, B, Viguier, C, Arora, S & O'Kennedy, R 2011 Generation of an anti-NAGase single chain antibody and its application in a biosensor-based assay for the detection of NAGase in milk. Journal of Immunological Methods 364 14–20Google Scholar