Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:19:07.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk yield, udder health and reproductive performance in Swedish organic and conventional dairy herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2009

Nils Fall  and
Ulf Emanuelson
Nils Fall*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Ulf Emanuelson
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organic dairy farming is an expanding segment of the dairy sector where cow management differs from the conventional model in many respects. Thus, a comparative evaluation of disease and welfare status in organically and conventionally managed dairy cows is required. Assessment of milk yield, udder health and reproductive performance (RP) was done in 20 organically and 20 conventionally managed Swedish dairy herds. In accordance with earlier findings we confirmed lower milk yield in organic cows. Udder health and RP were chosen as indicators of animal health in view of their clinical relevance and the availability of appropriate data bases providing good background knowledge for further animal health assessment. No obvious differences were found in the investigations of somatic cell count (SCC) profiles or time to veterinary-treated cases of mastitis between organically and conventional managed cows. Pregnancy success at first insemination, an appropriate measurement of RP with biological interpretation and background, did not reveal any difference between management types, whereas the hazard rate-ratio (HR) of having a calving-interval was significantly lower (HR=0·71) in organically managed cows. The calving-interval is an important financial determinator in dairy production, but it is not considered an optimal indicator of biologic relevance as it partially reflects farmer decisions. In conclusion, the organically managed cows in this study did not differ from conventionally managed cows in udder health or RP, with the exception of calving interval.

Keywords

Organic dairyingudder healthreproductive performance.
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , November 2009 , pp. 402 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnouin, J, Bord, S, Bazin, S & Chassagne, M 2005 Dairy management practices associated with incidence rate of clinical mastitis in low somatic cell score herds in france. Journal of Dairy Science 88 3700–3709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennedsgaard, TW, Thamsborg, SM, Vaarst, M & Enevoldsen, C 2003 Eleven years of organic dairy production in denmark: Herd health and production related to time of conversion and compared to conventional production. Livestock Production Science 80 121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busato, A, Trachsel, P, Schallibaum, M & Blum, JW 2000 Udder health and risk factors for subclinical mastitis in organic dairy farms in switzerland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 44 205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council Of The European Communities, 1999 Council regulation (EC) no. 1804/99 of 19 July 1999 Supplementing regulation (ecc) no. 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock production. T. C. O. T. E. Communities, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Danell, B 1982 Studies on lactation yield and individual test-day yields of swedish dairy cows. 2: Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 32 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, KA, Innocent, GT, Mihm, M, Cripps, P, McLean, WG, Howard, CV & Grove-White, D 2007 Dairy cow cleanliness and milk quality on organic and conventional farms in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research 74 302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fall, N, Emanuelson, U, Martinsson, K & Jonsson, S 2008a Udder health at a swedish research farm with both organic and conventional dairy cow management. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83 186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fall, N, Forslund, K & Emanuelson, U 2008b Reproductive performance, general health, and longevity of dairy cows at a swedish research farm with both organic and conventional production. Livestock Science 118 11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fall, N, Grohn, YT, Forslund, K, Essen-Gustafsson, B, Niskanen, R & Emanuelson, U 2008c An observational study on early-lactation metabolic profiles in Swedish organically and conventionally managed dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 3983–3992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, C, Emanuelson, U, Forslund, K, Hansson, I & Ekman, T 2006 Mastitis and related management factors in certified organic dairy herds in sweden. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 48 11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, C, Hansson, I, Ekman, T, Emanuelson, U & Forslund, K 2002 Health of cows, calves and young stock on 26 organic dairy herds in sweden. Veterinary Record 150 503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, I, Hamilton, C, Ekman, T & Forslund, K 2000 Carcass quality in certified organic production compared with conventional livestock production. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B 47 111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardarson, GH 2001 Is the modern high potential dairy cow suitable for organic farming conditions? Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (Supplement) 95 63–67Google Scholar
Hardeng, F & Edge, VL 2001 Mastitis, ketosis, and milk fever in 31 organic and 93 conventional norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2673–2679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovi, M & Roderick, S 2000 Mastitis and mastitis control strategies in organic milk. Cattle Practice 8 259–264Google Scholar
Hörning, B 2000. Comparison of animal welfare on conventional and organic dairy farms. Proceedings of the 13th International IFOAM Conference, Zürich p. 335Google Scholar
Ivemeyer, S, Maeschli, A, Walkenhorst, M, Klocke, P, Heil, F, Oser, S & Notz, C 2008 [Effects of a two-year dairy herd health management programme on udder health, use of antibiotics and longevity]. Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 150 499–505Google Scholar
Langford, FM, Rutherford, KM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB & Haskell, MJ 2009 A comparison of management practices, farmer-perceived disease incidence and winter housing on organic and non-organic dairy farms in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research 76 6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löf, E, Emanuelson, U & Gustafsson, H 2007a Data management affects reproductive performance indicators in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science 57 73–80Google Scholar
Löf, E, Gustafsson, H & Emanuelson, U 2007b Associations between herd characteristics and reproductive efficiency in dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4897–4907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mörk, M, Lindberg, A, Alenius, S, Vågsholm, I & Egenvall, A 2009 Comparison between dairy cow disease incidence in data registered by farmers and in data from a disease-recording system based on veterinary reporting. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 88 298–307Google Scholar
Nauta, WJ, Baars, T & Bovenhuis, H 2006 Converting to organic dairy farming: consequences for production, somatic cell scores and calving interval of first parity holstein cows. Livestock Science 99 185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, KM, Green, MJ, Peeler, EJ, Fitzpatrick, JL & Green, LE 2006 Investigation of risk factors for clinical mastitis in british dairy herds with bulk milk somatic cell counts less than 150,000 cells/ml. Veterinary Record 158 649–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reksen, O, Tverdal, A & Ropstad, E 1999 A comparative study of reproductive performance in organic and conventional dairy husbandry. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2605–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roesch, M, Doherr, MG & Blum, JW 2005 Performance of dairy cows on swiss farms with organic and integrated production. Journal of Dairy Science 88 2462–2475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roesch, M, Doherr, MG & Blum, JW 2006 Management, feeding, production, reproduction and udder health on organic and conventional swiss dairy farms. Schweizer Archiv Fur Tierheilkunde 148 387–395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roesch, M, Doherr, MG, Schären, W, Schällibaum, M & Blum, JW 2007 Subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in swiss organic and conventional production systems. Journal of Dairy Research 74 86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozzi, P, Miglior, F & Hand, KJ 2007 A total merit selection index for ontario organic dairy farmers. Journal of Dairy Science 90 1584–1593Google Scholar
Sasser, RG, Williams, RJ, Bull, RC, Ruder, CA & Falk, DG 1988 Post-partum reproductive performance in crude protein-restricted beef cows: Return to estrus and conception. Journal of Animal Science 66 3033–3039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehested, J, Kristensen, T & Soegaard, K 2003 Effect of concentrate supplementation level on production, health and efficiency in an organic dairy herd. Livestock Production Science 80 153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaarst, M, Bennedsgaard, TW, Klaas, I, Nissen, TB, Thamsborg, SM & Ostergaard, S 2006 Development and daily management of an explicit strategy of nonuse of antimicrobial drugs in twelve Danish organic dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 89 1842–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Borell, E, Dobson, H & Prunier, A 2007 Stress, behaviour and reproductive performance in female cattle and pigs. Reproductive Behavior in Farm and Laboratory Animals, 11th Annual Meeting of the Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology 52 130–138Google Scholar
von Borell, E & Sorensen, JT 2004 Organic livestock production in Europe: Aims, rules and trends with special emphasis on animal health and welfare. Livestock Production Science 90 3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar