Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Mein, G. A.
Thiel, C. C.
Westgarth, D. R.
and
Fulford, Rosemary J.
1973.
Friction between the teat and teatcup liner during milking.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Thompson, P.D.
and
Miller, R.H.
1974.
Retrograde Flow of Milk Within Machine-Milked Teats.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 12,
p.
1489.
Thompson, P.D.
1981.
Milking Machines – The Past Twenty-Five Years.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 6,
p.
1344.
Williams, David M.
and
Mein, Graeme A.
1986.
The bovine teat canal: information from measurement of velocity of milk flow from the teat.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
179.
Mein, Graeme A.
Williams, David M.
and
Thiel, Cliff C.
1987.
Compressive load applied by the teatcup liner to the bovine teat.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 3,
p.
327.
Hamann, Jörn
and
Mein, Graeme A.
1988.
Responses of the bovine teat to machine milking: measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
331.
Butler, M.C.
and
Hillerton, J.E.
1989.
Methods of assessing teatcup liner performance.
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,
Vol. 44,
Issue. ,
p.
77.
Frost, A.R.
1990.
Robotic milking: a review.
Robotica,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
311.
Rønningen, Odd
and
Reitan, Arne Dagfinn
1990.
Teat length and penetration into teatcup during milking in Norwegian Red Cattle.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
165.
Hamann, Jörn
and
Mein, Graeme A.
1990.
Measurement of machine-induced changes in thickness of the bovine teat.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
495.
Newman, Janthea A.
Grindal, Robert J.
and
Butler, M. Clare
1991.
Influence of liner design on mouthpiece chamber vacuum during milking.
Journal of Dairy Research,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 1,
p.
21.
Isaksson, A.
and
Lind, O.
1992.
Teat Reactions in Cows Associated With Machine Milking*.
Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1-10,
p.
282.
Hamann, J.
Mein, G.A.
and
Wetzel, S.
1993.
Teat Tissue Reactions to Milking: Effects of Vacuum Level.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 4,
p.
1040.
Neijenhuis, F.
Klungel, G.H.
and
Hogeveen, H.
2001.
Recovery of Cow Teats after Milking as Determined by Ultrasonographic Scanning.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 12,
p.
2599.
Weiss, D.
Weinfurtner, M.
and
Bruckmaier, R.M.
2004.
Teat Anatomy and its Relationship with Quarter and Udder Milk Flow Characteristics in Dairy Cows.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 10,
p.
3280.
Paulrud, CO
Clausen, S
Andersen, PE
and
Rasmussen, MD
2005.
Infrared Thermography and Ultrasonography to Indirectly Monitor the Influence of Liner Type and Overmilking on Teat Tissue Recovery.
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 3,
Tolle, A.
2010.
Die subklinische Kokkenmastitis des Rindes Eine Übersicht.
Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 5,
p.
329.
Marnet, Pierre‐Guy
2013.
Milk and Dairy Products in Human Nutrition.
p.
46.
Besier, J.
and
Bruckmaier, R.M.
2016.
Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 99,
Issue. 4,
p.
3096.
Stauffer, Claudia
Feierabend, Martina
and
Bruckmaier, Rupert M.
2020.
Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
Journal of Dairy Science,
Vol. 103,
Issue. 10,
p.
9250.