Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:38:51.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetic behaviour of Staphylococcus aureus on cheese as a function of water activity and temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

Heeyoung Lee ,
Kyungmi Kim ,
Soomin Lee  and
Yohan Yoon
Heeyoung Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea
Kyungmi Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea
Soomin Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea
Yohan Yoon*
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 140-742, Korea
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study developed mathematical models in order to evaluate the effect of Aw (Water activity) and growth temperature on Staphylococcus aureus kinetic behaviour. The Aw levels (0·970, 0·975, 0·983, and 0·991) of cheese were adjusted by NaCl; then, Staph. aureus was inoculated on the cheese, followed by storage at 7–30 °C for 72–720 h. Total bacterial and Staph. aureus cell counts were enumerated on tryptic soy agar and mannitol salt agar, respectively. The Baranyi model was fitted to the Staph. aureus growth data in order to calculate the maximum specific growth rate (μmax; log CFU/g/h), lag phase duration (λ; h), lower asymptote (N0; log CFU/g) and upper asymptote (Nmax; log CFU/g). The effects of storage temperature and Aw on the kinetic parameters (μmax and λ) were then further analysed with the Ratkowsky-type model and a polynomial equation, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) and relative error (RE) were calculated in order to estimate the model performance. No significant effect of Aw on Staph. aureus growth was observed at 7 °C; thus, the Baranyi model was fitted to the growth data from 15, 25 and 30 °C. The μmax values (0·011–0·303 log CFU/g/h) increased (P<0·05) as the storage temperature and Aw increased. In addition, λ values (2·42–63·48 h) decreased (P<0·05) as storage temperature and Aw increased; yet, the effect of Aw on λ was observed only at 15 °C. The theoretical minimum storage temperature and Aw were 10·15 °C and 0·882, respectively. RMSE (0·010–1·544) and RE values (−0·131 to 0·187) from validation indicated that model performance was appropriate. Hence, these results suggest that the developed models in this study should be useful in describing the effect of temperature and Aw on the growth kinetic behaviour of Staph. aureus in cheese along with the exposure assessment of Staph. aureus in cheese as well.

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureuswater activitycheesemathematical model
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 64 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, MR, Little, CL & Easter, MC 1991 Modelling the effect of pH, acidulant and temperature on the growth rate of Yersinia enterocolitica. Journal of Applied Microbiology 71 65–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird-Parker, TC 2000 Staphylococcus aureus. In The Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food, pp. 1317–1330 (Eds Lund, BM, Baird-Parker, TC & Gould, GW). Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Baranyi, J & Roberts, TA 1994 A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. International Journal of Food Microbiology 23 277–294Google Scholar
Bergdoll, MS 1989 Staphylococcus aureus. In Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens, pp. 463–523 (Ed. Doyle, MP). New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Colombari, V, Mayer, MD, Laicini, ZM, Mamizuka, E, Franco, BD, Destro, MT & Landgraf, M 2007 Foodborne outbreak caused by Staphylococcus aureus: phenotypic and genotypic characterization of strains of food and human sources. Journal of Food Protection 70 489–493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EC 2005 Commission Recommendation of 1 March 2005 concerning a coordinated programme for the official control of foodstuffs for 2005 (2005/175/EC). Official Journal of the European Union L59 27–39. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:059:0027:0039:EN:PDF (Accessed 5 February 2014), European CommissionGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, LM & Bohach, GA 2001 Staphylococcus aureus. In Fundamentals of Food Microbiology, pp. 410–434 (Eds Beuchat, L, Doyle, M & Montville, T). Washington, DC: American Society for MicrobiologyGoogle Scholar
Jol, S, Kassianenko, A, Wszol, K & Oggel, J 2006 Issues in time and temperature abuse of refrigerated foods. Process Control. Available at: http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/december-2005january-2006/issues-in-time-and-temperature-abuse-of-refrigerated-foods/ (Accessed 5 February 2014)Google Scholar
Jorgensen, HJ, Mathisen, T, Lovseth, A, Omoe, K, Qvale, KS & Loncarevic, S 2005 An outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning caused by enterotoxin H in mashed potato made with raw milk. FEMS Microbiology Letters 252 267–272Google Scholar
Kim, K, Lee, H, Moon, J, Kim, Y, Heo, E, Park, H, & Yoon, Y 2013 Mathematical models to predict Staphylococcus aureus growth on processed cheeses. Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety 28 217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousta, M, Mataragas, M, Skandamis, P & Drosinos, EH 2010 Prevalence and sources of cheese contamination with pathogens at farm and processing levels. Food Control 21 805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Loir, Y, Baron, F & Gautier, M 2003 Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genetics and Molecular Research 2 63–76Google Scholar
Little, CL, Rhoades, JR, Sagoo, SK, Harris, J, Greenwood, M, Mithani, V, Grant, K & McLauchlin, J 2008 Microbiological quality of retail cheeses made from raw, thermized or pasteurized milk in UK. Food Microbiology 25 304–312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MFDS 2014 Status of food poisoning outbreaks in Korea. Available at: http://www.mfds.go.kr/e-stat/index.do (Accessed 2 January 2014), Ministry of Food and Drug SafetyGoogle Scholar
Oscar, TP 2005a Development and validation of primary, secondary, and tertiary models for growth of Salmonella Typhimurium on sterile chicken. Journal of Food Protection 68 2606–2613Google Scholar
Oscar, TP 2005b Validation of lag time and growth rate models for Salmonella Typhimurium: acceptable prediction zone method. Journal of Food Science 70 M129–M137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, DA, Olley, J, McMeekin, TA & Ball, A 1982 Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. Journal of Bacteriology 149 1–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, M, Schuler-Schmid, U & Scmidt-Lorenz, W 1990 Temperature limits of growth, TNase, and enterotoxin production of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from foods. International Journal of Food Microbiology 11 1–19Google Scholar
Tamarapu, S, McKillip, JL & Drake, M 2001 Development of a multiplex Polymerase chain reaction assay for detection and differentation of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy products. Journal of Food Protection 64 664–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valik, L & Gorner, F 1993 Growth of Staphylococcus aureus in pasta in relation to its water activity. Journal of Food Microbiology 20 45–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiting, RC 1995 Microbial modelling in foods. Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 35 467–494Google Scholar
Whiting, RC & Buchanan, RL 1993 A classification of models in predictive microbiology. Food Microbiology 10 175–177Google Scholar
Wijtzes, T, McClure, PJ, Zwietering, MH & Roberts, TA 1993 Modelling bacterial growth of Listeria monocytogenes as a function of water activity, pH and temperature. International Journal of Food Microbiology 18 139–149Google Scholar
Yoon, Y 2010 Principal theory and application of predictive microbiology. Food Science and Industry 43 70–74Google Scholar