Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:50:48.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of some physical characteristics of the milking machine on the rate of new mastitis infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. C. Thiel ,
Carol L. Cousins ,
D. R. Westgarth  and
F. K. Neave
C. C. Thiel
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Carol L. Cousins
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
D. R. Westgarth
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
F. K. Neave
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Large differences in new infection rates occurred with half-udder milking machines in which one half of the cluster operated substantially free from vacuum fluctuations while the other half was subjected to various combinations of different types of fluctuation in vacuum. To increase the rate of new infection all teats were contaminated before and after each milking by immersion in a suspension of Streptococcus agalactiae and Str. dysgalactiae. A series of short-duration trials indicated that neither irregular nor cyclic fluctuations in vacuum acting alone were able to increase new infection rate. However, either the Nyhan and Cowhig irregular fluctuation, or a variant of it in combination with cyclic fluctuations in vacuum, was able to do so under the particular experimental conditions used.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 117 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cochran, W. G. (1950). Biometrika 37, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousins, C. L. (1972). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Cowhig, M. J. & Nyhan, J. F. (1967). Animal Production Division Research Report, p. 60. Dublin: An Foras Taluntais.Google Scholar
Hoyle, J. B. & Dodd, F. H. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingwill, R. G., Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H., Griffin, T. K., Westgarth, D. R. & Wilson, C. D. (1970). Veterinary Record 87, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, J. F. (1969). Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Milking 1968, p. 71. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J. & Walshe, M. J. (1970). Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 279.Google Scholar
Phillips, D.S.M., Whiteman, D. P. & Walker, H. T. M. (1969). New Zealand Veterinary Journal 17, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Specification (1970). Machine milking: Definitions and Terminology. FIL-IDF 56:1970. Brussels: Inter national Dairy Federation.Google Scholar
Also Dairy Science Abstracts (1972), 34, 429.Google Scholar
Thiel, C. C., Clough, P. A. & Akam, D. N. (1964). Journal of Dairy Research 31, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, C. C., Clough, P. A., Westgarth, D. R. & Akam, D. N. (1968). Journal of Dairy Research 35, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar