Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T19:15:21.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of mastitis on growth of starter organisms used for the manufacture of fermented milks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

I. Okello-Uma  and
Valerie M. E. Marshall
I. Okello-Uma
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Reading Laboratory (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Valerie M. E. Marshall
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Reading Laboratory (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of milk containing increased somatic cells on the starter organisms Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and L. acidophilus was examined. Increased somatic cell count resulted in stimulation of Str. thermophilus owing to increased proteolysis, but inhibition of L. acidophilus as a consequence of increased phagocytic activity of the polymorphonuclear leucocytes

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , November 1986 , pp. 631 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M. & Andrews, A. T. 1977 Progressive changes in individual milk protein concentrations associated with high somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Research 44 223–235Google Scholar
Andrews, A. T. 1982 A new approach to general detection and measurement of proteinase and proteinase inhibitor activities. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 708 194–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, A. T. 1983 Breakdown of caseins by proteinases in bovine milks with high somatic cell counts arising from mastitis or infusion with bacterial endotoxin. Journal of Dairy Research 50 57–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. G. & Donnelly, W. J. 1981 Casein compositional studies. II. The effect of secretory disturbance on casein composition in freshly drawn and aged bovine milks. Journal of Dairy Research 48 437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramley, A. J. 1976 Variations in the susceptibility of lactating and non-lactating bovine udders to infection when infused with Escherichia coli. Journal of Dairy Research 43 205–211Google Scholar
Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H. & Griffin, T. K. Eds 1981 Mastitis Control and Herd Management. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying, NIRD Technical Bulletin no. 4Google Scholar
De Man, J. C., Rogosa, M. & Siiarpe, M. E. 1960 A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 23 130–135Google Scholar
De Rham, O. & Andrews, A. T. 1982 a The roles of native milk proteinase and its zymogen during proteolysis in normal bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Research 49 577–585CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Rham, O. & Andrews, A. T. 1982 b Qualitative and quantitative determination of proteolysis in mastitic milks. Journal of Dairy Research 49 587–596Google Scholar
Dodd, F. H. 1981 Mastitis control. In Mastitis Control and Herd Management p. 11–23. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying. NIRD Technical Bulletin no.4Google Scholar
Kitchen, B. J. 1981 Review of the progress of Dairy Science: Bovine mastitis; milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. Journal of Dairy Research 48 167–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, V. M. & Bramley, A. J. 1984 Stimulation of Streptococcus thermophilus growth in mastitic milk. Journal of Dairy Research 51 17–22Google Scholar
Marshall, V. M. E., Cole, W. M. & Mabbitt, L. A. 1982 Yoghurt made from single starter organisms using heat- or enzyme-treated milk or milk to which casein hydrolysate or sodium formate is added. Journal of Dairy Research 49 147–152Google Scholar
Marshall, V. M. E. & Mabbitt, L. A. 1980 The use of single starter organisms for yoghurt manufacture. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 33 129–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettipher, G. L. & Rodrigues, U. M. 1981 Rapid membrane filtration epifluorescent microscopic technique for the direct enumeration of somatic cells in fresh and formalin-preserved milk. Journal of Dairy Research 48 239–246Google Scholar
Sohalm, O. W., Carroll, E. J. & Jain, N. C. 1971 Bovine Mastitis. Philadelphia, PA: Lea&FebigerGoogle Scholar
Shankar, P. A. 1977 Interrelationships of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus in yoghurt culture. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Tolle, A. 1971 A Monograph on Bovine Mastitis. Part I. Economics, Aetiology and Diagnosis. International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin Part IIGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. D. 1981 Prevalence of udder infection in the UK. In Mastitis Control and Herd Management pp. 40–49. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD Technical Bulletin no. 4).Google Scholar
Wilson, C. D. & Richards, M. S. 1980 A survey of mastitis in the British dairy herd. Veterinary Record 106 431–435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed