Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:40:10.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Friction between the teat and teatcup liner during milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

G. A. Mein ,
C. C. Thiel ,
D. R. Westgarth  and
Rosemary J. Fulford
G. A. Mein
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
C. C. Thiel
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
D. R. Westgarth
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Rosemary J. Fulford
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four studies are described of the role of friction in maintaining the teatcup stable on the teat. Measurements of the coefficient of friction between teats and pieces of liners, in which most values for the coefficient fell between 0·5 and 1·0, indicated that friction between skin and rubber-like materials was consistent with the general frictional behaviour of elastic solids. Studies during milking showed that the sudden restriction of milk flow that normally occurs near the end of milking is accompanied by a marked fall in the frictional force between the teat and barrel of the open liner. During the period of peak milk flow-rate, the major source of friction maintaining the teatcup stable on the teat is the large area of contact between the teat and liner barrel. The frictional force is derived from the pressure difference across the teat wall which presses the teat against the comparatively rigid liner. Frictional force between the teat and barrel increases after the start of milking because the coefficient of friction rises as one surface gradually moulds to the other. In addition, the total frictional force increases because of the increasing area of contact whenever the teat moves deeper into the liner, until the end of the peak flow-rate period. When this period ends, friction between the teat and open barrel is reduced suddenly because the teat sinus pressure falls. After this stage, the main source of friction appears to be derived from the force between the teat and mouthpiece lip.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 191 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowden, F. P. & Tabor, D. (1950). The Friction and Lubrication of Solids. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, F. P. & Tabor, D. (1964). The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, part II. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. C. & Tabor, D. (1966). Proceedings of the Royal Society A 291, 186.Google Scholar
Conant, F. S. & Liska, J. W. (1960). Rubber Chemistry and Technology 33, 1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitler, C. (1966). Some physico-chemical aspects of adhesion. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Aspects of Adhesion. City University. University of London Press Ltd.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation (1970). Machine milking: definitions and terminology. FIL-IDF 56. International Dairy Federation, Brussels.Google Scholar
Also published in Dairy Science Abstracts (1972) 34, 429.Google Scholar
Mein, G. A., Clough, P. A., Westgarth, D. R. & Thiel, C. C. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mein, G. A., Thiel, C. C. & Akam, D. N. (1973). Journal of Dairy Research 40, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mein, G. A., Thiel, C. C. & Clough, P. A. (1973). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 28, 26.Google Scholar
Tabor, D. (1960). Rubber Chemistry and Technology 33, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar