Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:04:58.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

Anna Vetter ,
H. Anette van Dorland ,
Mohammed Youssef  and
Rupert M. Bruckmaier
Anna Vetter
Affiliation:
Veterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
H. Anette van Dorland
Affiliation:
Veterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Mohammed Youssef
Affiliation:
Veterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland Animal Physiology Department, Vet-Medicine Faculty, South Valley University, 83523 Qena, Egypt
Rupert M. Bruckmaier*
Affiliation:
Veterinary Physiology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to examine the suitability of a short pre-stimulation (P) for 15 s followed by a latency period (L) of 30 s before cluster attachment for machine milking. In addition we tested the effect of a periodic reduction of the vacuum under the teat (VR) during the massage phase from 43 kPa to 12–15 kPa on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition. The study was carried out in 9 cows in a cross-over design. Animals were milked twice daily, and each of the 4 treatment combinations was used for six subsequent milkings (P+L vs. continuous P, and standard pulsation vs. VR, respectively). Milk flow was recorded during all experimental milkings. Longitudinal ultrasound cross sections of the teat were performed by B-mode ultrasound after the last milking of each treatment at 0, 5, and 15 min after the end of milking, respectively. None of the evaluated milking characteristics (total milk yield, main milking time, peak flow rate, average milk flow) differed between treatments. Teat measures as obtained by ultrasound cross sections showed no significant difference if individual treatments were compared at the three time points individually. However, teat wall thickness (TWT) tended to be smaller in VR vs. non-VR treatments at 5 min after milking (P=0·05). In conclusion, teat preparation consisting of a short stimulation followed by a latency period represents a similarly efficient pre-stimulation as a continuous pre-stimulation. VR seems to reduce the load on the teat tissue during milking and thus reduces the development of oedema and hence a less pronounced increase of TWT while milking characteristics are similar with or without VR.

Keywords

Machine milkingdairy cowpre-stimulationteat condition
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 107 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belo, CJ & Bruckmaier, RM 2010 Suitability of low-dosage oxytocin treatment to induce milk ejection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93 63–69 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 1992 B-mode ultrasonography of mammary glands of cows, goats and sheep during α- and β-adrenergic agonist and oxytocin administration. Journal of Dairy Research 59 151–159 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 1996 Simultaneous recording of oxytocin release, milk ejection and milk flow during milking of dairy cows with and without prestimulation. Journal of Dairy Research 63 201–208 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 1998 Oxytocin release and milk removal in ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 81 939–949 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, RM & Hilger, M 2001 Milk ejection in dairy cows at different degrees of udder filling. Journal of Dairy Research 68 369–376 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, RM, Rothenanger, E & Blum, JW 1995 Milking characteristics in dairy cows of different breeds from different farms and during the course of lactation. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 112 293–302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckmaier, RM, Macuhova, J & Meyer, HHD 2001 Specific aspects of milk ejection in robotic milking: a review. Livestock Production Science 72 169–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, DE, O'Callaghan, EJ & Rath, M 2003 Effect of vacuum level on bovine teat-tissue and milking characteristics. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 42 205–2011 Google Scholar
Gorewit, RC & Gassman, KB 1985 Effects of duration of udder stimulation on milking dynamics and oxytocin release. Journal of Dairy Science 68 1813–1818 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J & Mein, GA 1988 Responses of the bovine teat to machine milking: measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex. Journal of Dairy Research 55 331–338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J, Mein, GA & Wetzel, S 1993 Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level. Journal of Dairy Science 76 1040–1046 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaskous, S & Bruckmaier, RM 2011 Best combination of pre-stimulation and latency period duration before cluster attachment for efficient oxytocin release and milk ejection in cows with low to high udder-filling levels. Journal of Dairy Research 78 97–104 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, D, Flöck, M, Khol, JL, Franz, S, Stüger, HP & Baumgartner, W 2005 Ultrasonographic measurement of the bovine teat: breed differences, and the significance of the measurements for udder health. Journal of Dairy Research 72 296–302 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langlois, BE, Cox, JS, Hemken, RH & Nicolai, J 1981 Milking vacuum influencing indicators of udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 64 1837–1842 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, MD & Madsen, NP 2000 Effects of milkline vacuum, pulsator airline vacuum, and cluster weight on milk yield, teat condition, and udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 83 77–84 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, MD, Frimer, ES, Galton, DM & Petersson, LG 1992 The influence of premilking teat preparation and attachment delay on milk yield and milking performance. Journal of Dairy Science 75 2131–2141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenanger, E, Bruckmaier, RM & Blum, JW 1995 Association and dissociation of single quarter and total milk flow – effects of milking with and without pre-stimulation. Milchwissenschaft 50 63–67 Google Scholar
Sagi, R, Gorewit, RC, Merril, WG & Wilson, DB 1980 Premilking stimulation effects on milking performance and oxytocin and prolactin release in cows. Journal of Dairy Science 63 800–806 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS 2011 Version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA Google Scholar
Tančin, V, Uhrinčat', M, Mačuhová, L & Bruckmaier, RM 2007 Effect of pre-stimulation on milk flow pattern and distribution of milk constituents at a quarter level. Czech Journal of Animal Science 52 117–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, D & Bruckmaier, RM 2005 Optimization of individual prestimulation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 137–147 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, D, Weinfurtner, M & Bruckmaier, RM 2004 Teat anatomy and its relationship with quarter and udder milk flow characteristics in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87 3280–3289 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A, Bronzo, V, Piccinini, R, Moroni, P & Ruffo, G 1996 Field study on the relationship between teat thickness changes and intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Research 63 361–368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar