Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:25:58.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of the replacement of concentrates by roots on the intake and production of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
A. D Drysdale
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
R. Waite
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
J. N. Watson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr

Summary

To investigate the effect of replacing part of the concentrates by roots, a 16-week winter-feeding experiment was made using twelve Ayrshire cows. All the cows received 8 lb of hay per day and enough grass silage for a measurable residue to be left at each feed. Two rations were supplemented with 45 lb of fodder-beet per day but the other two contained no roots. At each level of root feeding, concentrates were fed at either 3·50 or 1·75 lb per 10 lb of milk.

All the fodder-beet was eaten (8·4 lb dry matter) and, as this caused a reduction in the intake of silage dry matter of only 3·4 lb per day, there was a net increase in drymatter intake. The level of concentrate feeding had little effect on the intake of the other feeds. Rations which included roots contained significantly less crude fibre than rations without roots.

The mean daily milk yields for the treatments with the low and high concentrate levels were 29·5 and 33·9 lb, respectively, without roots and 31·8 and 35·8 lb with roots. The fat percentages of the milk were similar on all four treatments whereas the solids-not-fat (S.N.F.) increased significantly from 8·42% on the treatment without roots and low concentrates to 8·64% on the treatment with roots and high concentrates. The response per 1 lb of extra S.E. was 1·0 lb milk and 0·02% S.N.F. between the low and high concentrate treatments and 0·7 lb milk and 0·05% S.N.F. between the two root treatments. The analysis of milk from individual quarters of all the cows during each period showed the continuous presence of some subclinical mastitis. It was estimated that this lowered the general level of S.N.F. percentage by 0·2% but did not bias the results from any one feeding treatment. For milk from healthy quarters only, the response to 1 lb extra S.E. from concentrates was 0·03% S.N.F. and from beet it was 0·08% S.N.F.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. L. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, P. S., Laing, C. & Malcolm, J. F. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. M. (1962). Proc. 16th Int. Dairy Congr. A, 161.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Drysdale, A. D. & Waite, R. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 67.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., & Watson, J. N. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1960). Bull. Minist. Agric. Lond., no. 48. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Reid, D., MacLusky, D. S., Waite, R. & Watson, J. N. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1011.Google Scholar
Russell, K. (1953). The Principles of Dairy Farming. Ipswich: Dairy Farmer (Books) Ltd.Google Scholar
Waite, R. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, R., Abbot, J. & Blackburn, P. S. (1963). J. Dairy Res. 30, 209.Google Scholar