Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:40:02.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of spring versus autumn grass/clover silage and rapeseed supplementation on milk production, composition and quality in Jersey cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2016

Mette Krogh Larsen ,
Stefania Vogdanou ,
Anne Louise F. Hellwing ,
Iga Rybicka  and
Martin Riis Weisbjerg
Mette Krogh Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Stefania Vogdanou
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Anne Louise F. Hellwing
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Iga Rybicka
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Martin Riis Weisbjerg*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The composition of grass/clover silage varies depending on time of harvest time. In particular silage from late regrowths is expected to contain lower fibre and higher linolenic acid concentrations compared to spring growth, thereby autumn silage is expected to increase linolenic acid content of milk fat. Rapeseed supplementation is expected to increase milk production and to increase all C18 fatty acids in milk fat. An interaction between rapeseed and silage type is expected, as hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids in rapeseed is expected to be less when low fibre silage is fed. Thirty-six Jersey cows were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design, for 4 periods of 3 weeks and with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: spring grass/clover silage from primary growth or autumn grass/clover silage which was an equal mixture of 3rd regrowth and 4th regrowth, with or without rapeseed supplementation. Dry matter intake and milk production was higher for autumn than for spring silage. Rapeseed supplementation did not affect dry matter intake, but increased milk production. The concentrations of C18 : 1cis9, C18 : 2n6 and β-carotene and C18 : 3n3 in milk were increased whereas the concentrations of C16 : 0, riboflavin and α-tocopherol were decreased with autumn silage. The majority of C18 FAs in milk and α-tocopherol concentration increased with rapeseed whereas C11 : 0 to C16 : 0 FA were reduced. Autumn silage reduced biohydrogenation of C18 : 2n6, whereas rapeseed increased biohydrogenation of C18 : 2n6 and reduced biohydrogenation of C18 : 3n3. Apparent recovery of C18 : 2n6 was reduced with rapeseed. Minor interaction effects of silage type and rapeseed addition were observed for some milk fatty acids. Feeding silage from late regrowth increased linolenic acid concentration in milk fat. Rapeseed inclusion increased milk production, and increased C18 : 0 as well as C18 : 1 fatty acids, but not C18 : 2 and C18 : 3 in milk fat. Interactions between silage type and rapeseed supplementation were minimal.

Keywords

Milkfatty acidsantioxidantsgrass silagerapeseedjersey
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , November 2016 , pp. 430 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkerlind, M, Weisbjerg, MR, Eriksson, T, Tøgersen, R, Udén, P, Ólafsson, BL, Harstad, OM & Volden, H 2011 Feed analyses and digestion methods. In NorFor – The Nordic Feed Evaluation System, pp. 41–54 (Ed. Volden, H). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers Google Scholar
Alstrup, L, Søegaard, K & Weisbjerg, MR 2016 Effect of maturity and harvest season of grass-clover silage and of forage-to-concentrate ratio on milk production of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99 328–340 Google Scholar
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis, 15 edn. Gaithersburg, MC, USA: AOAC International Google Scholar
Bossen, D, Weisbjerg, MR, Munksgaard, L & Højsgaard, S 2009 Allocation of feed based on individual dairy cow live weight changes I: feed intake and live weight changes during lactation. Livestock Science 126 252–272 Google Scholar
Canibe, N, Højberg, O, Badsberg, JH & Jensen, BB 2007 Effect of feeding fermented liquid feed and fermented grain on gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance in piglets. Journal of Animal Science 85 2959–2971 Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J & Doreau, M 2007 Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Technology 109 828–855 Google Scholar
Collomb, M, Sollberger, H, Bütikofer, U, Sieber, R, Stoll, W & Schaeren, W 2004 Impact of a basal diet of hay and fodder beet supplemented with rapeseed, linseed and sunflower seed on the fatty acid composition of milk fat. International Dairy Journal 14 549–559 Google Scholar
Hansen, B 1989 Determination of nitrogen as elementary N, an alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 39 113–118 Google Scholar
Huthanen, P, Rinne, M & Nousiainen, J 2007 Evaluation of the factors affecting silage intake of dairy cows: a revision of the relative silage dry-matter index. Animal 1 758–770 Google Scholar
Jenkins, TC 2010 Technical note: Common analytical errors yielding inaccurate results during analysis of fatty acids in feed and digesta samples. Journal of Dairy Science 93 1170–1174 Google Scholar
Jensen, C, Østergaard, S, Schei, I, Bertilsson, J & Weisbjerg, MR 2015 A meta-analysis of milk production responses to increased net energy intake in Scandinavian dairy cows. Livstock Science 175 59–69 Google Scholar
Knudsen, KEB, Åman, P& Eggum, BO 1987 Nutritive value of Danish-grown barley varieties I Carbohydrates and other major constituents. Journal of Cereal Science 6 173–186 Google Scholar
Larsen, MK, Hymøller, L, Brask-Pedersen, DB & Weisbjerg, MR 2012 Milk fatty acid composition and production performance of Danish Holstein and Danish Jersey cows different amounts of linseed and rapeseed. Journal of Dairy Science 95 3569–3578 Google Scholar
Larsen, MK, Kidmose, U, Kristensen, T, Beaumont, P & Mortensen, G 2013 Chemical composition and sensory quality of bovine milk as affected by type or forage and proportion of concentrate in the feed ration. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93 93–99 Google Scholar
Mertens, DR 2002 Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85 1217–1240 Google Scholar
Nozière, P, Graulet, B, Lucas, A, Martin, B, Grolier, P & Doreau, M 2006 Carotenoids for ruminants: from forages to dairy products. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131 418–450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NRC 2001 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, Seventh Revised edn. National Research Council (U.S.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press Google Scholar
Poulsen, NA, Rybicka, I, Poulsen, HD, Larsen, LB, Andersen, KK & Larsen, MK 2015 Seasonal variation in content of riboflavin and major minerals in bulk milk from three Danish dairies. International Dairy Journal 42 6–11 Google Scholar
Sjaunja, LO, Baevre, L, Junkkarinen, L, Pedersen, J & Setala, J 1991 A Nordic Proposal for an Energy Corrected milk (ECM) Formula, EEAP Publication no 50. Rome: European Association for animal production, pp. 156–157 Google Scholar
Slots, T, Butler, G, Leifert, C, Kristensen, T, Skibsted, LH & Nielsen, JH 2009 Potentials to differentiate milk composition by different feeding strategies. Journal of Dairy Science 92 2057–2066 Google Scholar
Stoldt, W 1952 Vorschlag zur vereinheitlichung der fettbestimmung in levensmitteln [Proposal for standardisation of fat determination in food]. Fette und Seifen 54, 206–207 Google Scholar
Tilley, JMA & Terry, RA 1963 A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18 104–111 Google Scholar
Van Ranst, G, Fievez, V, Vandewalle, M, De Riek, J & Van Bockstaele, E 2009 Influence of herbage species, cultivar and cutting date on fatty acid composition of herbage and lipid metabolism during ensiling. Grass and Forage Science 64 196–207 Google Scholar
Weisbjerg, MR & Hvelplund, T 1993 Bestemmelse af nettoenergiindhold (FEk) i foder til kvæg [Estimation of net energy content (FU) in feeds for cattle]. National Institute of Animal Science, Report No. 3/993. Frederiksberg Bogtrykkeri, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Weisbjerg, MR, Wiking, L, Kristensen, NB & Lund, P 2008 Effects of supplemental dietary fatty acids on milk yield and fatty acid composition in high and medium yielding cows. Journal of Dairy Research 75 142–152 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witkowska, IM, Wever, C, Gort, G & Elgersma, A 2008 Effects of nitrogen rate and regrowth interval on perennial ryegrass fatty acid content during the growing season. Agronomy Journal 100 1371–1379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z & Huber, JT 1994 Relationship betweek dietary-fat supplementation and milk protein-concentration in lactating cows – a review. Livestock Production Science 39 141–155 Google Scholar