Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:43:57.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of concentrates of high or low starch equivalent, both fed at two levels, on the milk production of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. E. Castle ,
D. S. Maclusky ,
J. Morrison  and
J. N. Watson
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
D. S. Maclusky
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
J. Morrison
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
J. N. Watson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In a winter feeding trial, using eight Ayrshire cows, two concentrates with digestible crude protein contents of 15% and starch equivalents of 63 and 79 were each fed at 2·6 and 4·6 lb./gal. of milk.

2. The basal ration was hay, silage, dried grass and fodder-beet.

3. Milk yield was significantly increased from 30·9 to 34·7 lb./day when the amount of concentrate fed increased from 2·6 to 4·6 lb./gal., but the average milk yields when the concentrates low in starch equivalent were fed did not differ significantly from those obtained when the concentrates high in starch equivalent were fed at the same levels.

4. The fat content of the milk was similar on all four rations with an average value of 3·84%, whereas the solids-not-fat varied from 8·53% on the low starch concentrate fed at the lower rate to 8·77% on the high starch concentrate fed at the higher rate.

5. The cows which were fed at the rate of 4·6 lb./gal. were significantly heavier by an average of 33 lb./cow than the ones fed at the rate of 2·6 lb./gal. The two different qualities of concentrate did not cause differences in live weight.

6. The weight of dry matter in the basal ration consumed per day was similar on all four treatments.

7. A comparison of feeding costs and the value of the milk showed that the largest margin was obtained with the low starch equivalent concentrate fed at the rate of 2·6 lb./gal.

8. It was concluded that because of the loss in live weight on the lowest level of feeding, and because the quality of the concentrate gave no improvement in milk yield or liveweight and little improvement in milk composition, the optimal level of feeding in this experiment was 4·6 lb./gal. of the low starch equivalent concentrate.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1959 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Holmes, W., Waite, R., MacLusky, D. S. & Watson, J. N. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Reid, D. & Holmes, W. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Holmes, W., Reid, D., MacLusky, D. S., Waite, R. & Watson, J. N. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Williams, E. J. (1949). Aust. J. Sci. Res. 2(A), 149.Google Scholar
(5)Woodman, H. E. (1948). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48.Google Scholar
(6)Lucas, H. L. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1011.Google Scholar
(7)Watson, S. J. & Horton, E. A. (1936). J. agric. Sci. 26, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Holmes, W. (1953). Adv. Leaft. Dep. Agric. Scot. no. 25.Google Scholar
(9)Bailey, G. L., Castle, M. E. & Foot, A. S. (1953). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 21, 42.Google Scholar
(10)Blackburn, P. S., Laing, C. M. & Malcolm, J. F. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Blaxter, K. L. (1950). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 20, 1.Google Scholar