Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:10:03.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of rapid tests for assessing UHT milk sterility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Jorge A. Reinheimer
Affiliation:
Instituto de Lactología Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Santiago del Estero 2829, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
Maria R. Demkow
Affiliation:
Instituto de Lactología Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Santiago del Estero 2829, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina

Summary

Samples of UHT milk were contaminated at two levels (102 and 104 cfu/ml) with 52 bacterial strains associated with spoilage. Samples were assayed, using various tests, to determine efficiency in detecting non-sterility after an incubation period shorter than that advised in standard procedures. The tests performed were colony count, titratable acidity and pH modification, organoleptic assessment, stability towards ethanol (68, 80 and 88% v/v), resazurin and nitrate reduction. After 3 d incubation at 30 °C every case was detected by the resazurin test with a good statistical probability (P = 0·999). Reliability was not so high in all other tests, even after 14 d incubation.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alais, C. 1985 Ciencia de la leche. Principios de tecnica lechera. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Reverte S.A.Google Scholar
Demeter, K. J. 1969 Lactobacteriologia. Zaragoza, Spain: Editorial AcribiaGoogle Scholar
Flake, J. C., Dabbah, R. & Weddle, D. B. 1978 Reduction methods. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 14th edn, pp. 187195 (Ed. Marth, E. H.). Washington, DC: American Public Health AssociationGoogle Scholar
Holt, J. G. (Ed.) 1986 Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Baltimore, MD: Williams and WilkinsGoogle Scholar
INRA-ELNOR 1982 [Assessing UHT milk: a test with shortest response time.] Tecḣnique Laitière No. 966 125127Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1969 Control methods for sterilized milk. (International Standard FIL-IDF 48)Google Scholar
Lück, H. 1972 Bacteriological quality tests for bulk-cooled milk. Dairy Science Abstracts 34 101122Google Scholar
Lück, H., Mostert, J. F. & Husmann, R. A. 1978 Bacteriological evaluation of UHT milk. South African Journal of Dairy Technology 10, 8385Google Scholar
Mac Fadin, J. F. 1980 [Biochemical tests for the identification of bacteria of clinical significance.]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Médica Panamericana S.A.Google Scholar
Rapp, M., Münch, S., Prinz, I. & Enkelmann, D. 1972 [Improved nitrate reduction test.] Milchwissenschaft 27 355360Google Scholar
Redys, J. J., Messer, J. W., Gilliland, S. E., Marshall, R. T., Ronald, G. W. & White, C. H. 1978 Supplemental microbiological control methods. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 14th edn, pp. 327354 (Ed. Marth, E. H.). Washington, DC: American Public Health AssociationGoogle Scholar
Reinheimer, J. A., Bargagna, M. L., Candioti, M. C., Ramanzin, M. G. & Zalazar, C. A. 1985 [Psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk. Characteristics and levels of contamination in the Santa Fe area.] Alimentación Latinoamericana 153 7680Google Scholar
Roberts, A. W. 1977 Quality assurance of UHT products. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 30 157160Google Scholar
Volk, W. 1981 Engineering Statistics with a Programmable Calculator. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Zadow, J. G. 1980 UHT milk – standards and quality assurance. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 35 140144Google Scholar