Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:28:31.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Closing forces of the bovine teat canal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

David M. Williams
Affiliation:
Milking Research Centre, Institute of Dairy Technology, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Graeme A. Mein
Affiliation:
Milking Research Centre, Institute of Dairy Technology, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia

Summary

The magnitude of the forces causing closure of the bovine teat canal was estimated by measuring the pressure required to cause retrograde flow of milk into the canal from a manometer attached to the external teat orifice. Before milking, the hydrostatic pressure required to cause retrograde flow was 12 kPa or greater. Retrograde flow occurred at a pressure of 4–6 kPa once the teat canal surface had been wetted. This 2- or 3-fold fall in the closing forces presumably resulted from the combined effects of fracturing the teat canal epithelium and loss of initial resting tension in the smooth muscle fibres surrounding the teat canal. After milking, retrograde flow into any teat canal occurred at a pressure ∼ 1 kPa lower than the wetted, pre-milking value. This small drop, and subsequent recovery ∼ 30 min after milking, reflects the change in tonicity of the smooth muscle fibres which are stretched during milking. At hydrostatic pressures below 7–9 kPa, retrograde flow could be arrested momentarily by the occurrence of a teat contraction. At 4–7 kPa, the wave of contraction was also capable of expelling 4–14 μl milk from the teat canal indicating the outwardly directed, peristaltic nature of the phasic muscular activity.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernabé, J. & Peeters, G. 1980 Studies on the motility of smooth muscles of the teats in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Research 47 259275Google Scholar
Kitts, W. D., Merriman, M. & Berry, J. C. 1963 Studies on the intramammary pressure of dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 43 4755Google Scholar
Lefcourt, A. 1981 Rhythmic contractions of the teat sphincter in bovines – an expulsion mechanism. Federation Proceedings 40 241Google Scholar
McDonald, J. S. 1970 Microscopic observations of teat canals from susceptible and resistant bovine mammary glands: a preliminary report. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Cattle Diseases, Philadelphia, 1970 pp. 97103 (Eds McFeely, R. A., Morse, G. E. and Williams, E. I.) Oklahoma: Hermitage PressGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. S. M. 1965 The theory of milking action at the cow's teat: the mechanics of the cow's teat. Proceedings of the Milking Machine Summer School and Conference pp. 3447Google Scholar
Pounden, W. D. & Grossman, J. D. 1950 Wall structure and closing mechanisms of the bovine teat. American Journal of Veterinary Research 11 349354Google Scholar
Venske, C. E. 1940 A histological study of the teat and gland cistern of the bovine mammary gland. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 96 170175Google Scholar
Williams, D. M. & Mein, G. A. 1978 Physiological and physical responses of the supported teat during milking. Proceedings, Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Council 17 96106Google Scholar
Williams, D. M. & Mein, G. A. 1982 Physical and physiological factors affecting milk flowrate from the bovine teat during machine milking. In Dairy Production from Pasture pp. 4274 (Eds Macmillan, K. L. and Taufa, V. K.) NZ: Clarke & Matheson (New Zealand Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication 8)Google Scholar
Williams, D. M. & Mein, G. A. 1985 The role of machine milking in the invasion of mastitis organisms and implications for maintaining low infection rates. Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte 37 415425Google Scholar