Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:11:05.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bovine milk protease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. R. Dulley
J. R. Dulley
Affiliation:
Otto Madsen Dairy Research Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries, Harbour Road, Hamilton, Brisbane 4007, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Milk protease, the naturally occurring proteolytic enzyme from fresh raw bovine milk, was purified 629-fold. Purification methods are described which included acid precipitation, ion-exchange and gel chromatography and ammonium sulphate fractionation. It was necessary to use a large-scale purification as the amounts of enzyme in milk are very low.

The basic properties of the enzyme were elucidated from experiments on this partially purified fraction. Under the conditions of assay these showed a wide pH optimum from 6·5 to 9·0 and a temperature optimum of 37°C. The protease was fairly heat stable, the stability being pH dependent.

The source of the enzyme appeared to be the mammary gland, where the enzyme was also detected.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babcock, S. M. & Russell, H. L. (1897). Wisconsin Agr. Expt. Sta., 14th Ann. Rept. 161.Google Scholar
Fischer, L. (1969). In Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Eds Work, T. S. and Work, E.). Vol. 1, p. 172. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gornall, A. G., Bardawill, C. J. & David, M. M. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 177, 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, W. J., Robertson, J. A. Jr & Gould, I. A. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, G. W., Fruton, J. S. & Bergmann, M. (1941). J. biol. Chem. 138, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiermeier, F. & Semper, G. (1960). Z. Lebensmittelunters. u. -Forsch. 111, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, E. A. & Sober, H. A. (1962). Meth. Enzym. 5, 3.Google Scholar
Reiter, B., Sorokin, Y., Pickering, A. & Hall, A. J. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, V. R. (1963). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 18, 31.Google Scholar
Storrs, A. B. & Hull, M. E. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. C. & Polis, E. (1945). J. Am. chem. Soc. 67, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, R. McL. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittle, C. A. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar