Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:50:28.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure of the casein micelle. The accessibility of the subunits to various reagents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

B. Ribadeau Dumas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines, Département de Technologie, I.N.R.A., 78–Jouy-en-Josas, France
J. Garnier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines, Département de Technologie, I.N.R.A., 78–Jouy-en-Josas, France

Summary

Carboxypeptidase A (CPA, mol. wt = 34600) and 1-dimethylaminonaphthalene-5-sulphonyl chloride (dansyl chloride, mol. wt = 270) were shown to react with the 3 casein subunits, αs1-, β- and κ-caseins, which constitute the micelle. Virtually all of the C-terminal amino acids were released by CPA from these subunits without disrupting the micellar structure.

It was verified that the rate of dissociation of the micelle into low molecular weight complexes is considerably slower than the rates at which these reagents act on micellar components. It is concluded that dansyl chloride, CPA, and probably also rennin, whose molecular weight is similar to that of CPA, are able to penetrate to the interior of the micelles. This was confirmed in a quite independent way with a non-reacting agent, myoglobin (mol. wt = 17000).

It is postulated that the casein micelle has a sponge-like structure in which the 3 different subunits are distributed fairly uniformly.

Micellar fractions obtained by differential centrifugation from skim-milk and colostrum were examined for their content of αs1-, β-, κ- and para-κ-caseins by the use of CPA as described by Ribadeau Dumas (1968). The results confirm that there is a real difference in κ-casein content of the micelles, according to their rate of sedimentation.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Garnier, J. & Ribadeau Dumas, B. (1969). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, D 268, 2749.Google Scholar
Hill, R. D. & Craker, B. A. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitschmann, Hs. (1949). Helv. chim. Acta 32, 1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau Dumas, B. (1968). Biochim. biophys. Acta 168, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau Dumas, B. & Garnier, J. (1969). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, D 268, 2504.Google Scholar
Ribadeau Dumas, B. & Veaux, M. (1964). J. Dairy Res. 31, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 1897,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 171.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. C. (1964). Biochim. biophys. Acta 90, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. A., Fitzpatrick, M. M. & Stanton, E. K. (1959). Nature, Lond. 183, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technical Bulletin (1964), A-TB.-008, Palo Alto: Spinco Division, Beckman Instr. Inc., and Ibid. A-TB.-10A (1965).Google Scholar
Wake, R. G. & Baldwin, R. L. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta 47, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. & Noble, R. W. Jr (1965). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. & von Hippel, P. H. (1956). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78, 4576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar