Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:28:05.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter region of river buffalo stearoyl CoA desaturase gene (SCD) is associated with milk yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2012

Alfredo Pauciullo ,
Gianfranco Cosenza ,
Roberto Steri ,
Angelo Coletta ,
Antonio La Battaglia ,
Dino Di Berardino ,
Nicolò P P Macciotta  and
Luigi Ramunno
Alfredo Pauciullo*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environment and Animal Production Science, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Portici (NA), Italy
Gianfranco Cosenza*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environment and Animal Production Science, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Portici (NA), Italy
Roberto Steri
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
Angelo Coletta
Affiliation:
Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Specie Bufalina, Località Centurano, Caserta, Italy
Antonio La Battaglia
Affiliation:
Comunità Montana Alto Agri, Villa D'Agri di Marsicovetere (PZ), Italy
Dino Di Berardino
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environment and Animal Production Science, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Portici (NA), Italy
Nicolò P P Macciotta
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
Luigi Ramunno
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Plant, Environment and Animal Production Science, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Portici (NA), Italy
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An association study between the milk yield trait and the stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) polymorphism (g.133A > C) in Italian Mediterranean river buffalo was carried out. A full characterization of the river buffalo SCD promoter region was presented. Genotyping information was provided and a quick method for allelic discrimination was developed. The frequency of the C allele was 0·16. Test-day (TD) records (43 510) of milk production belonging to 226 lactations of 169 buffalo cows were analysed with a mixed linear model in order to estimate the effect of g.133A > C genotype, as well as the effect of parity and calving season. The SCD genotype was significantly associated with milk yield (P = 0·02). The genotype AC showed an over-dominance effect with an average daily milk yield approximately 2 kg/d higher than CC buffaloes. Such a difference represents about 28% more milk/d. The effect of the genotype was constant across lactation stages. The contribution of SCD genotype (r2SCD) to the total phenotypic variance in milk yield was equal to 0·12. This report is among the first indications of genetic association between a trait of economic importance in river buffalo. Although such results need to be confirmed with large-scale studies in the same and other buffalo populations, they might offer useful indications for the application of MAS programmes in river buffalo and in the future they might be of great economic interest for the river buffalo dairy industry.

Keywords

Mediterranean river buffalostearoyl CoA desaturase gene (SCD)milk yieldmarker assisted selection
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 429 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afzal, M, Anwar, M & Mirza, MA 2007 Some factors affecting milk yield and lactation length in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 27 113–117Google Scholar
AIA 2010 Milk recording activity: official statistics. In Annual Report of the Italian Breeders Association. p. 31. Rome, Italy: Associazione Italiana AllevatoriGoogle Scholar
Banos, G, Woolliams, JA, Woodward, BW, Forbes, AB & Coffey, MP 2008 Impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in leptin, leptin receptor, growth hormone receptor, and diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) gene loci on milk production, feed, and body energy traits of UK dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 3190–3200Google Scholar
Barile, VL 2005 Improving reproductive efficiency in female buffaloes. Livestock Production Science 92 183–194Google Scholar
Bionaz, M & Loor, JJ 2008 Gene networks driving bovine milk fat synthesis during the lactation cycle. BMC Genomics 9 366Google Scholar
Borghese, A & Mazzi, M 2005 Buffalo population and strategies in the world. In Buffalo Production and Research, pp. 1–40. Roma, Italy: FAO – Regional Office for EuropeGoogle Scholar
Carta, A, Casu, S, Usai, MG, Addis, M, Fiori, M, Fraghı, A, Miari, S, Mura, L, Piredda, G, Schibler, L, Sechi, T, Elsen, JM & Barillet, F 2008 Investigating the genetic component of fatty acid content in sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 79 22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catillo, G, Macciotta, NPP, Carretta, A & Cappio-Borlino, A 2002 Effects of age and calving season on lactation curves of milk production traits in Italian water buffaloes. Journal of Dairy Science 85 1298–1306Google Scholar
Dang, AK, Mukherjee, J, Kapila, S, Mohanty, AK, Kapila, R & Prasad, S 2010 In vitro phagocytic activity of milk neutrophils during lactation cycle in Murrah buffaloes of different parity. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94 706–711Google Scholar
Drost, M 2007 Advanced reproductive technology in the water buffalo. Theriogenology 68 450–453Google Scholar
García-Fernández, M, Gutiérrez-Gil, B, García-Gámez, E, Sánchez, JP & Arranz, JJ 2010 Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting the milk fatty acid profile on sheep chromosome 22: role of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene in Spanish Churra sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 93 348–357Google Scholar
Gautier, M, Barcelona, RR, Fritz, S, Grohs, C, Druet, T, Boichard, D, Eggen, A & Meuwissen, THE 2006 Fine mapping and physical characterization of two linked quantitative trait loci affecting milk fat yield on BTA26. Genetics 172 425–436Google Scholar
Gossens, M & Kan, JW 1981 DNA analysis in the diagnosis of haemoglobin disorders. Methods in Enzymology 76 805–817Google Scholar
Graves, RA, Tontonoz, P, Ross, SR & Spiegelman, BM 1991 Identification of a potent adipocyte-specific enhancer: involvement of an NF-1-like factor. Genes and Development 5 428–437Google Scholar
Grisart, B, Coppieters, W, Farnir, F, Karim, L, Ford, C, Berzi, P, Cambisano, N, Mni, M, Reid, S, Simon, P, Spelman, R, Georges, M & Snell, R 2002 Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Research 12 222–231Google Scholar
Harvatine, KJ & Bauman, DE 2006 SREBP1 and thyroid hormone responsive spot 14 (S14) are involved in the regulation of bovine mammary lipid synthesis during diet-induced milk fat depression and treatment with CLA. Journal of Nutrition 136 2468–2474Google Scholar
Kay, JK, Weber, WJ, Moore, CE, Bauman, DE, Hansen, LB, Chester-Jones, H, Crooker, BA & Baumgard, LH 2005 Effect of week of lactation and genetic selection for milk yield on milk fatty acid composition in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 3886–3893Google Scholar
Kuehn, C, Edel, C, Weikard, R & Thaller, G 2007 Dominance and parent-of-origin effects of coding and non-coding alleles at the acylCoA-diacylglycerol-acyltransferase (DGAT1) gene on milk production traits in German Holstein cows. BMC Genetics 24 62Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Henry, PR & Ammerman, CB 1998 Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76 1216–1231Google Scholar
Macciotta, NPP, Mele, M, Conte, G, Serra, A, Cassandro, M, Dal Zotto, R, Cappio, Borlino A, Pagnacco, G & Secchiari, P 2008 Association between a polymorphism at the stearoyl CoA desaturase locus and milk production traits in Italian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 91 3184–3189Google Scholar
Mele, M, Conte, G, Castiglioni, B, Chessa, S, Macciotta, NP, Serra, A, Buccioni, A, Pagnacco, G & Secchiari, P 2007 Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase gene polymorphism and milk fatty acid composition in Italian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4458–4465Google Scholar
Moioli, B, Contarini, G, Avalli, A, Catillo, G, Orru, L, De Matteis, G, Masoero, G & Napolitano, F 2007 Effect of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase polymorphism on fatty acid composition of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 90 3553–3558Google Scholar
Ntambi, JM 1999 Regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturase by polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol. Journal of Lipid Research 40 1549–1558Google Scholar
Olofsson, LE, Orho-Melander, M, William-Olsson, L, Sjöholm, K, Sjöström, L, Groop, L, Carlsson, B, Carlsson, LM & Olsson, B 2008 CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (C/EBPα) in adipose tissue regulates genes in lipid and glucose metabolism and a genetic variation in C/EBPα is associated with serum levels of triglycerides. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 93 4880–4886Google Scholar
Paton, CM & Ntambi, JM 2009 Biochemical and physiological function of stearoyl-CoA desaturase. American Journal of Physiology – Endocrinology and Metabolism 297 E28–E37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauciullo, A, Cosenza, G, D'Avino, A, Colimoro, L, Nicodemo, D, Coletta, A, Feligini, M, Marchitelli, C, Di Berardino, D & Ramunno, L 2010 Sequence analysis and genetic variability of stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD) gene in the Italian Mediterranean river buffalo. Molecular and Cellular Probes 24 407–410Google Scholar
Pauciullo, A, Cosenza, G, Steri, R, Coletta, A, Jemma, L, Feligini, M, Di Berardino, D, Macciotta, NPP & Ramunno, L 2011 An association analysis between OXT genotype and milk yield and flow in Italian Mediterranean river buffalo. Journal of Dairy Research 79 150–156Google Scholar
Stanton, TL, Jones, LR, Everett, RW & Kachman, SD 1992 Estimating milk, fat, and protein lactation curves with a test day model. Journal of Dairy Science 75 1691–1700Google Scholar
Zhu, J, He, F, Hu, S & Yu, J 2008 On the nature of human housekeeping genes. Trends in Genetics 24 481–484Google Scholar