Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:34:31.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural variation in biomarkers indicating mastitis in healthy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

Maria Åkerstedt ,
Linda Forsbäck ,
Torben Larsen  and
Kerstin Svennersten-Sjaunja
Maria Åkerstedt*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Kungsängen Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Linda Forsbäck
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Kungsängen Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
Torben Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Kerstin Svennersten-Sjaunja
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Kungsängen Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*For correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dairy herds are expanding and, with increasing numbers of animals in each herd, there is a need for automatic recording of indicators in milk in order to detect mastitis, inflammation of the udder. A number of biomarkers for mastitis have been suggested over the years. Mastitis usually occurs in one of the four udder quarters and since it is now possible to milk each udder quarter separately in automated milking systems, it is important to evaluate the normal variation in the biomarkers at udder quarter level. This study evaluated the normal variations between milkings for some biomarkers in clinically healthy cows, determined by repeated somatic cell count and bacteriological analysis. The biomarkers studied were serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin (Hp), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAGase) and alkaline phosphatase (AP), parameters that have been suggested as markers for mastitis. Ten cows were monitored on 42 consecutive milking occasions through collection of udder quarter milk samples and representative cow composite milk samples, giving a total of 2100 individual milk samples. Each cow had its individual profile for the concentrations and variations in the parameters analysed. Although there was relatively large variation between cows for the biomarkers analysed, the variation between milkings in clinically healthy quarters within cows was often below 10%. The biomarker with the lowest variation in this study was LDH. The results suggest that comparing quarters within an individual cow can identify deviations from the natural variations between milkings. This could be a valuable tool instead of, or in combination with, a cut-off value for each parameter in order to detect changes in the milk indicating mastitis.

Keywords

Biomarkersmastitismilkcow
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 88 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkerstedt, M, Björck, L, Persson Waller, K & Sternesjö, Å 2006 Biosensor assay for determination of haptoglobin in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Research 73 299–305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Åkerstedt, M, Persson Waller, K & Sternesjö, Å 2007 Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in relation to the somatic cell count at quarter, cow composite and bulk tank milk samples. Journal of Dairy Research 74 198–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åkerstedt, M, Persson Waller, K, Bach Larsen, L, Forsbäck, L & Sternesjö, Å 2008 Relationship between haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in milk and milk quality. International Dairy Journal 18 669–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaei, H, Mansouri-Najand, L, Molaei, MM, Kheradmand, A & Sharifan, M 2007 Assessment of lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase activities in cows’ milk as an indicator of subclinical mastitis. Veterinary Research Communications 31 419–425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berglund, I, Petterson, G, Östensson, K & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2007 Quarter milking for improved detection of increased SCC. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42 427–432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogin, E & Ziv, G 1973 Enzymes and minerals in normal and mastitic milk. Cornell Veterinarian 63 666–676Google ScholarPubMed
Bradley, AJ 2002 Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. Veterinary Journal 164 116–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagunda, MGG, Friggens, NC, Rasmussen, MD & Larsen, T 2006a A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2980–2998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagunda, MGG, Larsen, T, Bjerring, M & Ingvartsen, KL 2006b L-lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase activites in bovine milk as indicators of non-specific mastitis. Journal of Dairy Research 73 431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, JW, Brandt, P, Mahoney, JR & Lee, JT 1982 Haptoglobin: A natural bacteriostat. Science 215 691–693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckersall, PD, Young, FJ, McComb, C, Hogarth, CJ, Safi, S, Weber, A, McDonald, T, Nolan, AM & Fitzpatrick, JL 2001 Acute phase proteins in serum and milk from dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Veterinary Record 148 35–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernley, HN & Walker, PG 1969 Studies on alkaline phosphatase (Transient-state and steady state kinetics of E.coli alkaline phosphatase). Biochemical Journal 111 187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsbäck, L, Lindmark-Månsson, H, Andrén, A, Åkerstedt, M & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2009 Udder quarter milk composition at different levels of somatic cell count in cow composite milk. Animal 3 710–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsbäck, L, Lindmark-Månsson, H, Andrén, A, Åkerstedt, M, Andrée, L & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2010 Day-to-day variation in milk yield and milk composition at the udder-quarter level. Journal of Dairy Science 93 3569–3577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grönlund, U, Hulten, C, Eckersall, PD, Hogarth, C & Waller, KP 2003 Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in milk and serum during acute and chronic experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Research 70 379–386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grönlund, U, Sandgren, CH & Waller, KP 2005 Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in milk from dairy cows with chronic sub-clinical mastitis. Veterinary Research 36 191–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, F 1995 Milk Quality. London UK: Blackie Academic & Professional.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, RJ 1994 Symposium: Mastitis and genetic evaluation for somatic cell count—physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 77 2103–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiss, S, Mielenz, M, Bruckmaier, RM & Sauerwein, H 2004 Haptoglobin concentrations in blood and milk after endotoxin challenge and quantification of mammary Hp mRNA expression. Journal of Dairy Science 87 3778–3784CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiss, S, Mueller, U, Neu-Zahren, A & Sauerwein, H 2007 Haptoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase measurements in milk for the identification of subclinically infected quarters. Veterinarni Medicina 52 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdaway, RJ, Holmes, CW & Steffert, IJ 1996 A comparison of indirect methods for diagnosis of subclinical intramammary infections in lactating dairy cows, Part II: The discriminative ability of eight parameters in foremilk from individual quarters and cows. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 51 72–78Google Scholar
Jacobsen, S, Niewold, TA, Kornalijnslipjer, E, Toussaint, MJM & Gryus, E 2005 Kinetics of local and systemic isoforms of serum amyloid A in bovine mastitic milk. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 104 21–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, BJ, Middleton, G & Salmon, M 1978 Bovine milk N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase and its significance in the detection of abnormal udder secretions. Journal of Dairy Research 45 15–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakic, B, Wredle, E, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K & Östensson, K 2009 Is there a special mechanism behind the changes in somatic cell and polymorphonuclear leukocyte counts, and composition of milk after a single prolonged milking interval in cows? Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 51:4 (open access)Google Scholar
Larsen, T 2005 Determination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in milk by a flourometric assay. Journal of Dairy Research 72 209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, MA, Weber, A, Weber, AT & McDonald, TL 2005 Differential expression and secretion of bovine serum amyloid A (SAA3) by mammary epithelial cells stimulated with prolactin or lipopolysaccahride. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 107 255–264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Krifucks, O, Merin, U, Lavi, Y & Silanikove, N 2006 Interactions between bacteria type, proteolysis of casein and physico-chemical properties of bovine milk. International Dairy Journal 16 648–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, YL, Laurent, F & Moussaoui, F 2003 Polymorphonuclear proteolytic activity and milk composition change. Veterinary Research 34 629–645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattila, T, Pyörälä, S & Sandholm, M 1986 Comparison of milk antitrypsin, albumin, N-Acetyl-β-d-Glucosaminidase, somatic cells and bacteriological analysis as indicators of bovine subclinical mastitis. Veterinary Research Communication 10 113–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, TL, Larson, MA, Mack, DR & Weber, A 2001 Elevated extrahepatic expression and secretion of mammary-associated serum amyloid A 3 (M-SAA3) into colostrum. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 83 203–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, NI, Larsen, T, Bjerring, M & Ingvartsen, KL 2005 Quarter health, milking interval, and sampling time during milking affect the concentration of milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 88 3186–3200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Mahony, MC, Healy, AM, Harte, D, Walshe, KG, Torgerson, PR & Doherty, ML 2006 Milk amyloid A: Correlation with cellular indices of mammary inflammation in cows with normal and raised serum amyloid A. Research in Veterinary Science 80 155–161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyörälä, S & Pyörälä, E 1997 Accuracy of methods using somatic cell count and N-Acetyl-β-d-Glucosaminidase activity in milk to assess the bacteriological cure of bovine clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80 2820–2825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyörälä, S 2003 Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary Research 34 565–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, LBW, Hansen, DH, Kæstel, P, Michaelsen, KF, Friis, H & Larsen, T 2008 Milk enzyme activities and subclinical mastitis among women in Guinea-Bissau. Breastfeeding Medicine 3 215–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute 2004 Statistical Analysis Systems Institute in SAS/STAT® 9.1 User's Guide SAS Inst Inc. Cary NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Schepers, AJ, Lam, TJGM, Schukken, YH, Wilmink, JBM & Hanekamp, WJA 1997 Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. Journal of Dairy Science 80 1833–1840CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schüttel, M 1999 [Comparison of NAG-ase in milk, blood and urine of lactating cows] Dissertation Dr Med Vet Tierärtslicher Hochschule Hannover GermanyGoogle Scholar
Spörndly, R 2003 Feed tables for ruminants 2003 Report 257 Department of Animal Nutrition and Management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden ISSN 0347–9838Google Scholar
Westermark, P, Johnson, KH, Westermark, GT, Sletten, K & Hayden, DW 1986 Bovine amyloid protein AA: Isolation and amino acid sequence analysis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 85 609–614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed