Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:16:36.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fixation of bovine casein micelles for chromatography on controlled pore glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Malcolm Anderson
Affiliation:
*National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Mary C. A. Griffin
Affiliation:
*National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Carolyn Moore
Affiliation:
*National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading), Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK

Summary

Glutaraldehyde was used to fix the size distribution of casein micelles in skim milk before their fractionation by permeation chromatography on controlled pore glass. The effect of fixation was assessed by comparing the size and absorption profile for column fractions obtained from samples which were fixed before fractionation with those of unfixed samples and of samples that were fixed only after completion of chromatography. Micelle size was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy. Column profiles were obtained from absorption measurements at 340 nm and after pronase digestion at 280 nm to determine relative protein concentration. For comparative purposes the elution profile was divided into 4 peak areas, of which I-III contained most of the casein micelles, and IV consisted of the smallest micelles, soluble casein and whey protein. Average micelle size was unaltered by fixation but was larger in fractions from prefixed skim milk than those from unfixed samples. Fixation increased the absorbance readings but the elution profile at 340 nm for peak areas I-III was essentially the same for unfixed fractions and those obtained when fixation was applied after chromatography. However, areas I-III accounted for a much larger proportion of the total profile area when the latter procedure was followed. Total profile area increased with fixation time and temperature but this did not affect the elution profile. The results indicate that fixation with glutaraldehyde does not induce artefactual changes in casein micelle size.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A. T. & Cheeseman, G. C. 1971 Properties of aseptically packed UHT milk: casein modification during storage and studies with model systems. Journal of Dairy Research 38 193207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstkand, B. & Laksson-Raznikiewicz, M. 1978 The monomeric casein composition of different size bovine casein micelles. Biochimica et Biophysica Ada 536 19Google Scholar
Griffin, M. C. A. & Anderson, M. 1983 The determination of casein micelle size distribution in skim milk by chromatography and photon correlation spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Ada 748 453459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. & Koops, J. 1962 Preparation and properties of a salt solution which simulates milk ultrafiltrate. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 16 153164Google Scholar
McGann, T. C. A., Donnelly, W. J., Kearney, R. D. & Buchheim, W. 1980 Composition and size distribution of bovine casein micelles. Biochimica et Biophysica Ada 630 261270Google Scholar
McGann, T. C. A., Kearney, R. D. & Donnelly, W. J. 1979 Developments in column chromatography for the separation and characterization of casein micelles. Journal of Dairy Research 46 307311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, T. G. & Horne, D. S. 1980 Light scattering investigation of the stability of bovine casein micelles to dilution. Journal of Dairy Research 47 343350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. 1968 Relation between micellar and serum casein in bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 51 18971902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G., Both, P., Van Markwijk, B. W. & Buchheim, W. 1974 The determination of size and molecular weight of casein micelles by means of light-scattering and electron microscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Ada 365 7279Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, M., Takeuchi, M., Sasaki, R. & Chiba, H. 1982 Chemical characteristics of bovine casein micelles fractionated by size on CPG-10/3000 chromatography. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 46 10431048Google Scholar