Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T01:23:25.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

139. A Comparison between Blood Meal and Wheat Gluten as a Supplement to a Low-Protein Diet for Dairy Cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

S. Bartlett
S. Bartlett
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying (University of Reading)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A ration for dairy cows which supplied less protein than the recognized protein standards for milk production and contained less lysine than most rations normally used in English farming practice was selected. A comparison was then made between cows receiving this ration supplemented with (a) wheat gluten, a lysine-poor protein, and (b) blood meal, a lysine-rich protein. The addition of blood meal produced no measurable effect on the milk yields, but there was a small and almost significant advantage in the live weights of the cows.

2. In a subsidiary experiment a large increase in the dietary protein produced a very small and non-significant increase in milk yield.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1936 , pp. 222 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Report of the Departmental Committee on the Rationing of Dairy Cows (1925). Min. Agric. and Fish., H.M.S.O. London.Google Scholar
(2)Hills, (1922). Bull. Vt agric. Exp. Sta. No. 225.Google Scholar
(3) Perkins, (1925). Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Sta. No. 289.Google Scholar
(4) Hart, Humphrey, &Schaal, (1916). J. biol. Chem. 26, 457–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Morris, &Wright, (1933). J. Dairy Res. 4, 177–CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Morris, &Wright, (1933). J. Dairy Res. 5 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Morris, (1934). J. Dairy Res. 5, 108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8) Morris, &Wright, (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9) Fowler, Morris, &Wright, (1934). Scot. J. Agric. 17, 261.Google Scholar
(10) Miller, (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Mom, (1931). Analyst, 56, 228.Google Scholar
(12) Davies, (1932). Analyst 57, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Golding, (1934). Analyst 59, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar