Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:26:00.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

REAP-2: An interactive quantitative tool for robust and efficient dose-response curve estimation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2023

Xinying Fang
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
Xinyi Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
Vernon M. Chinchilli
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
Michael Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Hong-Gang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA Department of Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
Nikolay V. Dokholyan
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
Chan Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
J. Jack Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Shouhao Zhou*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
*
Corresponding author: S. Zhou, PhD; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

REAP-2 is an interactive dose-response curve estimation tool for Robust and Efficient Assessment of drug Potency. It provides user-friendly dose-response curve estimation for in vitro studies and conducts statistical testing for model comparisons with a redesigned user interface. We also make a major update of the underlying estimation method with penalized beta regression, which demonstrates great reliability and accuracy in dose estimation and uncertainty quantification. In this note, we describe the method and implementation of REAP-2 with a highlight on potency estimation and drug comparison.

Type
Brief Report
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Clinical and Translational Science

Introduction

Appropriate and reliable description of dose-response of individual compounds is vital in many active research fields including pharmacology, anesthesiology, toxicology, environmental science, and agrochemistry [1]. In contemporary drug development, it also demands accurate assessment of dose-response relationship [Reference Schindler2]. Nevertheless, it poses unique challenges in the empirical assessment. Due to limited knowledge in the planning stage of the in vitro experiments, often a significant proportion of data are extreme observations, with values close to either 0% or 100% of the response [Reference Zhou, Liu and Fang3]. Using the standard estimation approaches, we may experience either a significant efficiency loss if removing these extreme data points or a significant decrease in accuracy in the presence of the extreme observations, causing unstable estimation and erroneous uncertainty quantification of the dose-response relationship [Reference Zhou, Liu and Fang3].

To overcome the analytical challenge, we developed the Robust and Efficient Assessment of drug Potency (REAP) to estimate the median-effect equation based on the beta regression framework, along with a freely accessible, web-based R Shiny app [Reference Zhou, Liu and Fang3]. REAP takes on the beta law to account for non-normality and heteroscedasticity [Reference Ferrari and Cribari-Neto4] and minimizes the average density power divergence with a tuning parameter [Reference Ghosh5]. Compared to the standard regression-based assessment, REAP proves to be more robust and powerful to extreme observations when estimating the median-effect equation [Reference Zhou, Liu and Fang3].

Furthermore, to better assist the dose-response estimation, we conducted a comparative study [Reference Fang and Zhou6] using a Monte Carlo simulation to review 14 different dose-response estimation tools including dose-response R packages and beta regression-based algorithms. We examined them in 30 different scenarios with various settings of extreme responses and concluded that in general, the penalized beta regression using the mgcv R package [Reference Wood7] had the best performance in terms of feasibility, accuracy, and coverage probabilities of the target estimands for dose-response. Therefore, as an improvement to REAP, we developed an updated version named REAP-2 and employed the penalized beta regression along with the mgcv package in REAP-2 for accurate and reliable estimation of the dose-response relationship (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Overview of REAP-2 Shiny app. a: Left panel and curve tab of REAP-2; b: Summary tab of REAP-2.

Methods

Median-Effect Equation for Dose-Response Curve

The median-effect equation, based on the mass-action law generalized from more than 300 mechanism-specific equations, is a unified theory in medicine to characterize the behavior of enzyme inhibitors [Reference Greco, Bravo and Parsons8,Reference Chou and Talalay9]. It describe the in vitro dose-response relationship [Reference Chou10], and is formulated as:

$$ {f_{a} \over f_{u}}=\left({D \over D_{m}}\right)^{m} $$

where f a and f u are the affected and unaffected cell fractions at the dose level D. D m is the dose level, which generates the median effect. m, known as the Hill coefficient, describes the slope of the dose-response curve.

The median-effect equation can be simplified to:

$$ \log \left({f_{a} \over f_{u}}\right)=\log \left({f_{a} \over 1-f_{a}}\right)=m\log D-m\log D_{m} $$

For statistical modeling, the equation can be rewritten as:

$$ {\rm logit}\left(E\right)=\log {E \over 1-E}=\beta _{1}\log D+\beta _{0} $$

where β 0 and β 1 are the intercept and slope parameters that determine a sigmoid dose-response relationship with respect to the E = f a . The effect E is the expectation of the random variable Y. The observations of Y are used as the dependent variable to model the dose-response curve.

Beta Regression

Beta regression is proposed to model bounded outcomes on the standard unit interval (0,1) (Ferrari and Cribari-Neto, 2004). The classical beta regression framework is built upon the mean (μ)-precision (ϕ) parameterization. Its density function is written as:

$$ p\left(y|\mu,\phi \right)={\Gamma \left(\phi \right) \over \Gamma \left(\mu \phi \right)\Gamma \left(\left(1-\mu \right)\phi \right)}y^{\mu \phi -1}\left(1-y\right)^{\left(1-\mu \right)\phi -1} $$

where Γ() denotes the gamma function, 0 < μ < 1 and ϕ > 0. The beta density is easy to interpret with mean and variance and it is flexible enough to take on a variety of shapes, accounting for non-normality and heteroscedasticity [Reference Ferrari and Cribari-Neto4].

Penalized Beta Regression with the mgcv Package

The estimation of the penalized beta regression is accomplished by the mgcv package [Reference Wood7]. It was developed to estimate the penalized generalized linear models by adding the L2 ridge penalty on the log-likelihood function with a tuning parameter. The parameter estimations are obtained by maximizing the penalized likelihood with the penalized iteratively re-weighted least squares program by mgcv.

Implementation

Overview of REAP-2

We redesigned the user interface of REAP [Reference Zhou, Liu and Fang3] via Cascading Style Sheets and updated the estimation algorithm based on the comparative study results by implementing the penalized beta regression with the mgcv package [Reference Wood7] to estimate the dose-response.

REAP-2 Shiny app is freely available and accessible at https://xinying-fang.shinyapps.io/REAP/. The left panel of REAP-2 allows users to input data, specify the model and plot features, and download the analysis report (Fig. 1). The right panel contains three tabs: introduction, curve, and summary. The introduction tab provides an overview of REAP-2 as well as reference links to the previous version, REAP, and the manual of REAP-2. The curve tab (Fig. 1a) plots the dose-response curves and potency estimations based on the input data. The plot can be modified through Plot Specifics in the left panel and slider bars above the plot. The summary tab (Fig. 1b) provides table summaries on fitted median-effect equations, hill coefficients, potency estimations, and hypothesis testing for model comparison.

Highlighted Features of REAP-2

Robust and efficient uncertainty quantification

REAP-2 applied penalized beta regression to dose-response estimation. The innovation not only ameliorates accuracy for the interested estimands, such as Hill coefficients and drug potency in both point and interval estimation, but also improves efficiency with narrower confidence intervals at the same nominal level. Most importantly, it largely enhances reliability of robust beta regression framework in dose-response estimation, despite various patterns of extreme data in real-life applications [Reference Fang and Zhou6]. The results in previous comparative study demonstrate that the updated REAP-2 provides reliable estimations and possesses higher power in statistical testing.

Potency Estimation

REAP-2 enables estimations of self-specified compound potency (e.g., IC x or EC x values, corresponding to the concentrations that cause x% of the maximum inhibitory or maximum effect). REAP-2 enables the user-customization at any target effect of interest (x%, with x ranged in 0 and 100) and provides point estimation with standard deviation of the concentration to reach the target effect. The estimated concentrations are also represented as triangles in the dose-response curve plot (Fig. 1a). In the Summary tab (Second table of Fig. 1b), REAP-2 also enables pairwise comparison of potency estimations among different agents and conducts hypothesis testing on whether their potency estimations are the same.

Availability and Future Direction

REAP-2 is accessible via a web interface at https://xinying-fang.shinyapps.io/REAP/. The source code and a user guide for REAP-2 are publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/vivid225/REAP. It is built on an open-source platform within R Shiny environment and can be run under various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and Mac systems. Additionally, it can be deployed in Docker and utilized as a web server.

REAP-2 is designed to be extensively used in everyday applications of data analysis and scientific reporting in drug screening for diverse non-computational scientists. The penalized beta regression employed in REAP-2 along with the Shiny app enable the robust and efficient dose-response estimation, which can be further integrated into methods to identify drug interaction effect.

In real-data application, there are a diverse selection of alternative nonlinear functional forms for dose-response modeling. Notably, a compilation of distinct nonlinear illustrations of dose-response relationships is comprehensively documented within the research conducted by Ritz et al. [Reference Ritz, Baty, Streibig and Gerhard11]. As a future extension of REAP-2, more nonlinear forms and model averaging could be employed to characterize the dose-response relationship.

Funding statement

This study was supported in part by the Penn State College of Medicine Comprehensive Health Studies Program, Junior Faculty Development Award and Early Career Research Award, Pennsylvania Academy of Science Student Travel Award and Research Grant Award, and NIH Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA016672.

Comepeting interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Data availability statement

The REAP-2 Shiny app is available at https://xinying-fang.shinyapps.io/REAP-2/.

References

National Research Council. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. National Academies Press; 2007.Google Scholar
Schindler, M. Theory of synergistic effects: hill-type response surfaces as, null-interaction, models for mixtures. Theor Biol Med Model. 2017;14(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12976-017-0060-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, S, Liu, X, Fang, X, et al. Robust and efficient assessment of potency (REAP) as a quantitative tool for dose-response curve estimation. Elife. 2022;11:e78634. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, S, Cribari-Neto, F. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat. 2004;31(7):799815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A. Robust inference under the beta regression model with application to health care studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019;28(3):871888. doi: 10.1177/0962280217738142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, X, Zhou, S. A comparative study of in vitro dose-response estimation under extreme observations. Biometrical J. 2023;17:e2200092. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, SN. Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, WR, Bravo, G, Parsons, JC. The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacol Rev. 1995;47(2):331385.Google ScholarPubMed
Chou, TC, Talalay, P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984;22(C):2755. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(84)90007-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, T-C. The mass-action law based algorithm for cost-effective approach for cancer drug discovery and development. Am J Cancer Res. 2011;1(7):925954.Google ScholarPubMed
Ritz, C, Baty, F, Streibig, JC, Gerhard, D. Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Overview of REAP-2 Shiny app. a: Left panel and curve tab of REAP-2; b: Summary tab of REAP-2.