Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T19:41:18.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

464 Loading of the medial knee ligaments and anterior cruciate ligament during clinical tests of anteromedial rotatory instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2025

Andrew Pechstein
Affiliation:
Hospital for Special Surgery
Erin Berube
Affiliation:
Hospital for Special Surgery
Mark Amirtharaj
Affiliation:
Hospital for Special Surgery
Emma Reznick
Affiliation:
Hospital for Special Surgery
Thomas Wickiewicz
Affiliation:
Hospital for Special Surgery
Paul Christos
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
Carl Imhauser
Affiliation:
Hospital for Special Surgery
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives/Goals: Injury to the medial knee ligaments (sMCL, dMCL, POL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can cause anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). AMRI can cause knee instability and ACL graft failure, but it is unclear how the sMCL, dMCL, POL, and ACL resist AMRI. We aimed to characterize the in-situ forces of the sMCL, dMCL, POL, and ACL under loading conditions involved with AMRI. Methods/Study Population: We characterized the in situ forces of the sMCL, dMCL, POL, and ACL under 1) isolated external tibial rotation torque (ER), 2) isolated anterior tibial force (Ant), and 3) combined ER+Ant loading. Twenty-eight human cadaveric knees (18 male; mean age, 48±13; 21–65 years) were tested on a robotic manipulator with force sensing. Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded under isolated ER (4Nm, 0–90°), isolated Ant (134N at 0–90°), and combined ER+Ant (4Nm+100N at 15, 30, 90°). The sMCL, dMCL, POL, and ACL were dissected in random order. The in situ force (N) in the sMCL, dMCL, POL, and ACL at the peak applied load for each loading condition was calculated using superposition and compared with Kruskal–Wallis tests with post hoc pairwise testing using a Bonferroni–Holm correction for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). Results/Anticipated Results: Under isolated ER, the force in the sMCL (32–52N) from 0°-90° exceeded that of the ACL, dMCL, and POL at each flexion angle (p0.05). Force in the ACL was the second highest (26–6N from 0°-90°). Force in the dMCL and POL was low (≤12N). Under isolated Ant, the ACL carried the highest force at all flexion angles (≥113N) (p0.05), but at 90° the sMCL carried the highest force of all ligaments (p0.05). At 90°, force in the dMCL diminished (Discussion/Significance of Impact: We show that the sMCL is the major stabilizer to external rotation torques and combined anterior and external loading conditions related to anteromedial rotatory instability across the arc of knee flexion, while the dMCL, POL, and ACL play a less prominent role, with the exception of the ACL and dMCL near full extension.

Type
Precision Medicine/Health
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science