Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T17:32:15.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

420 Harmonization of quality indicators in Clinical Microbiology Laboratories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2025

Ellen Avery
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Setareh Aghamohammadi
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Laura Abbatangelo
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Asnia Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Mawada Tarhuni
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Vedant Shukla
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Janine Noorloos
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Susan Poutanen
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Ellen Avery
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives/Goals: This study aims to harmonize quality indicators (QIs) across University of Toronto-affiliated microbiology labs to establish universal benchmarks that enhance performance, patient safety, and health outcomes. Harmonized QIs will enable effective comparisons and enhance the consistency of care. Methods/Study Population: The study employed the Delphi method, a structured and iterative process to build consensus. An expert panel of clinical microbiology trainees, medical microbiologists, trainees, and site leads from five University of Toronto-affiliated microbiology labs was assembled. Initial insights were gathered through surveys and a comprehensive scoping review of the literature. The study involved two rounds of feedback, a SurveyMonkey-based survey, with a defined consensus of 75% agreement among participants. Followed by an implementation survey conducted through REDCap to assess how these QIs were adopted in practice and identify barriers to implementation. Results/Anticipated Results: The study achieved consensus on nine high-impact quality indicators, including blood culture volume and contamination rates, cerebrospinal fluid transport time, and turnaround times for Gram stain results. Blood culture contamination and positivity rates garnered the highest agreement, at 100% and 91%, respectively. While some indicators were widely accepted and implemented, others faced resistance due to feasibility concerns. The study also identified significant variability in the level of adoption across the participating laboratories, pointing to operational challenges and the need for further efforts to address these barriers. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This study highlights the importance of QI harmonization in improving lab services and patient safety. It reveals challenges in standardizing practices but promotes uniformity in QIs, laying the groundwork for better inter-lab collaboration, consistent outcomes, and improvements in microbiology.

Type
Other
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science