Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:26:00.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

219 Analyzing the NJ ACTS Education and Offering Inventory to Assess Training across the CTSA Consortium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Yasheca T Ebanks
Affiliation:
The School of Health Professions at Rutgers University
Sohaib Hassan
Affiliation:
The School of Health Professions at Rutgers University
Del Prado
Affiliation:
The School of Health Professions at Rutgers University
Justine Ebanks
Affiliation:
The School of Health Professions at Rutgers University
T Yasheca
Affiliation:
The School of Health Professions at Rutgers University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The New Jersey Alliance for Clinical and Translational Science (NJ ACTS) interest in developing a comprehensive education and training program for enhancing the quality, efficacy, and safety of the clinical research enterprise led to the release of a survey distributed nationwide to assess initiatives in the translational science workforce. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Twenty-one hubs responded to the survey and data was exported from REDCap to Excel. Respondent demographics were categorized to formalize roles and data was categorically divided into sections based on training type (engagement, basic, postgraduate etc…) utilizing conditional formatting. The limitation in this survey was a branching logic defect aligned with questions on competency tool usage and the roles that they play which led to only six hubs having the advantage to respond to all questions. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Summary findings showed that the majority of respondents for the survey (30%) were the Director of Operations’. Further; the Joint Task Force (JTF) domain Scientific Concepts and Research Design’ was the most preferred Hard Skill (81%) while the least preferred was Investigational Product Development and Regulation’ (29%). In spite of only six hubs receiving the short competency assessment; 50% of those hubs stated they would utilize ‘In House Assessment Tools’ and 83% stated they used the tools to ‘Develop Personalized Training Plans’. The assessment of this Inventory was indeed necessary to identify trends in available trainings across the CTSA consortium. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The internal cross training catalogue will help to develop an infrastructure for the NJ ACTS community to work along with other CTSA hubs while creating comprehensive clinical research training initiatives and programs.

Type
Education
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science