Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:02:55.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vocal production and novel word learning in the first year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2019

Marinella MAJORANO Open the ORCID record for Marinella MAJORANO [Opens in a new window] ,
Tamara BASTIANELLO ,
Marika MORELLI ,
Manuela LAVELLI  and
Marilyn M. VIHMAN
Marinella MAJORANO*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Tamara BASTIANELLO
Affiliation:
Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Marika MORELLI
Affiliation:
Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Manuela LAVELLI
Affiliation:
Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Marilyn M. VIHMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Human Sciences, Via San Francesco, 22, 37129 Verona, Italy. Tel.: 0458028372 ; fax: 0458028681; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated an effect of early vocal production on infants’ speech processing and later vocabulary. This study focuses on the relationship between vocal production and new word learning. Thirty monolingual Italian-learning infants were recorded at about 11 months, to establish the extent of their consonant production. In parallel, the infants were trained on novel word–object pairs, two consisting of early learned consonants (ELC), two consisting of late learned consonants (LLC). Word learning was assessed through Preferential Looking. The results suggest that vocal production supports word learning: Only children with higher, consistent consonant production attended more to the trained ELC images.

Keywords

vocal productionpreferential lookingword learningvocal motor scheme
Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 606 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(9), 3253–8.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), 1–143.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bello, A., Rinaldi, P., Stefanini, S., & Pasqualetti, P. (2017). Il Primo Vocabolario del Bambino: Gesti, Parole e Frasi [The First Vocabulary of the Child: Gestures, words and phrases]. Milano (MI): Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1199–211.Google Scholar
DePaolis, R. A., Keren-Portnoy, T., & Vihman, M. M. (2016). Making sense of infant familiarity and novelty responses to words at lexical onset. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 715. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00715Google Scholar
DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2011). Do production patterns influence the processing of speech in prelinguistic infants? Infant Behaviour and Development, 34, 590–601.Google Scholar
DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Nakai, S. (2013). The influence of babbling patterns on the processing of speech. Infant Behaviour and Development, 36, 642–9.Google Scholar
Dietrich, C., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 16027–31.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51, 419–39.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science, 9, 228–31.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. P. (2001). When half a word is enough: infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. Child Development, 72, 1003–15.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19, 515–23.Google Scholar
Goslin, J., Galluzzi, C., & Romani, C. (2014). PhonItalia: a phonological lexicon for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 872–86.Google Scholar
Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. A., Whitaker, C., & Williams, N. A. (2010). The role of vocal practice in constructing phonological working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1280–93.Google Scholar
Lacerda, F., & Sundberg, U. (2006). An ecological theory of language acquisition. Linguística. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 1, 53–106.Google Scholar
Law, F., & Edwards, J. R. (2015). Effects of vocabulary size on online lexical processing by preschoolers. Language Learning and Development, 11, 331–55.Google Scholar
Majorano, M., & D'Odorico, L. (2011). The transition into ambient language: a longitudinal study of babbling and first word production of Italian children. First Language, 31, 47–66.Google Scholar
Majorano, M., Vihman, M. M., & DePaolis, R. A. (2014). The relationship between infants’ production experience and their processing of speech. Language Learning and Development, 10, 179–204.Google Scholar
McAllister Byun, T. A. & Tessier, A. M. (2016). Motor influences on grammar in an emergentist model of phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10, 431–52.Google Scholar
McCune, L., & Vihman, M. M. (2001). Early phonetic and lexical development: a productivity approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 670–84.Google Scholar
McGillion, M. M., Matthews, D., Herbert, J., Pine, J., Vihman, M. M., Keren-Portnoy, T., & DePaolis, R. A. (2017). What paves the way to conventional language? The predictive value of babble, pointing and SES. Child Development, 88, 156–66.Google Scholar
McMurray, B., Horst, J., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119, 831–77.Google Scholar
Menn, L., & Vihman, M. M. (2011). Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or artefacts of analysis? In Clements, N. & Ridouane, R. (Eds.), Where do phonological features come from? The nature and sources of phonological primitives (pp. 261–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Olswang, L. B., Stoel-Gammon, C., Coggins, T., & Carpenter, R. (1987). Assessing prelinguistic and early linguistic behaviours in developmentally young children. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Renner, L. F. (2017). The magic of matching – speech production and perception in language acquisition (PhD dissertation). Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm. Retrieved from <http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-147908>>Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C., & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–71.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. (2016). Two-year-olds interpret novel phonological neighbours as familiar words. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1011–23.Google Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition, 76, 147–66.Google Scholar
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science, 13, 480–4.Google Scholar
Torkildsen, J. V. K., Svangstu, J. M., Hansen, H. F., Smith, L., Simonsen, H. G., Moen, I., & Lindgren, M. (2008). Productive vocabulary size predicts event-related potential correlates of fast mapping in 20-month-olds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1266–82.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1993). Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 61–82.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (2017). Learning words and learning sounds: advances in language development. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 1–27.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Macken, M. A., Miller, R., Simmons, H., & Miller, J. (1985). From babbling to speech: a reassessment of the continuity issue. Language, 61, 395–443.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., & Majorano, M. (2017). The role of geminates in infants’ early word production and word-form recognition. Journal of Child Language, 44, 158–84.Google Scholar
White, K. S., & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 114–32.Google Scholar