Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:00:03.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to commands revisited again*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Kenneth F. Ruder
Affiliation:
Bureau of Child Research Labs, Lawrence
Michael D. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
Harold M. Murai
Affiliation:
California State University at Sacramento

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Michael D. Smith, Ph.D., Dept. of Speech Pathology and Audiology, P.O. Box 4266, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L. (1975). Language development. In Horowitz, F. D. (ed.), Review of child development research, Vol. IV. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In Kavanagh, J. & Strange, W. (eds), Implications of basic speech and language research for the school and clinic. Cambridge Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Clark, R., Hutcheson, S. & Van Buren, P. (1974). Comprehension and production in language acquisition. JL 10. 3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. JVLVB 2. 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Shipley, E. F. & Smith, C. S. (1978). Old and new ways not to study comprehension. JChLang 5. 501–21.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). Origins of language comprehension. In Solso, R. (ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974). The relationship between comprehension and production. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, K. & Dixon, E. M. (1967). The growth of the control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. JChPsycholPsychiat 8. 31–9.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsychRev 81. 267–85.Google Scholar
Nurss, J. & Day, D. (1971). Imitation, comprehension, and production of grammatical structures. JVLVB 10. 6874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petretic, P. A. & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Does comprehension precede production? The development of children's responses to telegraphic sentences of varying grammatical adequacy. JChLang 4. 701–9.Google Scholar
Rodgon, M. (1976). Single word usage, cognitive development, and the beginnings of combinatorial speech. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Ruder, K. F., Rice, M. & Smith, M. D. (in press). Imitation, comprehension, and production: applications to language intervention. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. & Truswell, L. (1978). Comprehension of two-word instructions by children in the one-word stage. JChLang 5. 1725.Google Scholar
Shipley, E. F., Smith, C. S. & Gleitman, L. R. (1969). A study in the acquisition of language: free responses to commands. Lg 45. 322–42.Google Scholar
Strohner, H. & Nelson, K. (1974). The young child's development of sentence comprehension: influence of event probability, non-verbal context, syntactic form, and strategies. ChDev 45. 567–76.Google Scholar
Turner, E. A. & Rommetveit, R. (1967). The acquisition of sentence voice and reversibility. ChDev 38. 649–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Wetstone, H. & Friedlander, B. (1973). The effect of word order on young children's responses to simple questions and commands. ChDev 44. 734–40.Google Scholar
Winer, B. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-HillCrossRefGoogle Scholar