Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:38:53.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regular/irregular is not the whole story: the role of frequency and generalization in the acquisition of German past participle inflection*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

GISELA SZAGUN
GISELA SZAGUN*
Affiliation:
University College London, UK, Division of Psychology and Language Science
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Gisela Szagun, Division of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, 2 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 2 PF, UK. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The acquisition of German participle inflection was investigated using spontaneous speech samples from six children between 1 ; 4 and 3 ; 8 and ten children between 1 ; 4 and 2 ; 10 recorded longitudinally at regular intervals. Child-directed speech was also analyzed. In adult and child speech weak participles were significantly more frequent than strong participles. Children's errors involved all elements of participle marking. All error types, including over-regularization, occurred from the beginning alongside correct forms. Errors decreased significantly over age. Over-regularization in the sense of -t affixation on strong verbs was significantly more frequent than erroneous -en suffixation on weak verbs but not than prefix and suffix omission. On participles with stem vowel change erroneous stem vowel was significantly more frequent than correct stem vowel with suffix error alone. Error patterns are explained in terms of frequencies, and participle inflection being learned as part of general verb inflection.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , September 2011 , pp. 731 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant No. Sz 41/5-1 and No. Sz 41/5-2. I am most grateful to the children and their parents who so willingly participated in this study. Sonja Arnhold-Kerri, Tanja Hampf, Elfrun Klauke, Stefanie Kraft, Dagmar Roesner, Claudia Steinbrink and Barbara Stumper assisted in data collection, data transcription and data analysis. I would like to thank them all.

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. H., Piepenbroek, R. & von Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, PA.Google Scholar
Bartke, S. (1998). Experimentelle Studien zur Flexion und Wortbildung [Experimental studies on inflection and word formation]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H. (1993). Temporal reference in German child language. Amsterdam: Wöhrmann.Google Scholar
Behrens, H. (2002). Learning multiple regularities: Evidence from overgeneralization errors in the German plural. In Do, A. H.-J., Dominguez, L. & Johanse, A. (eds), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 72–83. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, D. (2000). Early verb development in one German-speaking child. In Bittner, D., Dressler, W. & Kilani-Schoch, M. (eds), First verbs: On the way to mini-paradigms. ZAS-Paper in Linguistics 18, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1996). The representation of participles in the German mental lexicon: Evidence for the dual-mechanism model. In Booij, G. & Van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996, 73–95. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Brain and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Research 22, 991–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Hadler, M. & Weyerts, H. (2004). Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults. Journal of Child Language 31, 683–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., Lück, M. & Hahne, A. (2007). How children process over-regularizations: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Child Language 34, 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Rothweiler, M. (1993). Inflectional rules in children's grammars: Evidence from the development of participles in German. In Booij, G. & Van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 1–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45, 225–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duden, , Band 4 [Volume 4]. (1995). Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [Grammar of contemporary German], 5th edn.Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Dunnett, W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrica 20, 482–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsen, H. (1998). The acquisition of past participles: One or two mechanisms? In Fabri, R., Ortmann, A. & Parodi, T. (eds), Models of inflection, 134–51. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidolph, K. E., Flämig, W. & Motsch, W. (1984). Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik, 2nd edn.Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M. (1988). Schemas in German plural formation. Lingua 74, 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S., Ravid, D., Korecky-Kröll, G., Laaha, G. & Dressler, W. (2006). Early noun plurals in German: Regularity, productivity or defaults? Journal of Child Language 33, 271–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindner, K. (1998). Overgeneralization revisited: The case of German past participles. In Fabri, R., Ortmann, A. & Parodi, T. (eds), Models of inflection, 152–74. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marcus, G., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R. & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29, 189–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G., Ullman, U., Pinker, S., Hollander, J., Rosen, T. & Xu, F. (1992). Over-regularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. E. (1985). The acquisition of German. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 141–254. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Penke, M. (2006). The representation of inflectional morphology in the mental lexicon: An overview on psycho- and neurolinguistic methods and results. In Wunderlich, D. (ed.), Advances in the theory of the lexicon, 389–427. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science 253, 530–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruoff, A. (1981). Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache [Frequency lexicon of spoken language]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarimski, K. (1987). Ordinalskalen zur sensomotorischen Entwicklung. [German version of Uzgiris, I. & Hunt, J. (1975). Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development. Champaign: University of Illinois Press] Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Siegal, S. & Castellan, N. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds.), Studies of child language development, 175–208. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Szagun, G. (2001). Learning different regularities: The acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children. First Language 21, 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G. (2004). German – Szagun. Talk Bank. http://childes.psy.cmu.eduGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G. & Stumper, B. (2007). The optional infinitive in German child language revisited: Evidence for the influence of adult input and verb constructions. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
Szagun, G., Stumper, B., Sondag, N. & Franik, M. (2007). The acquisition of gender marking by young German-speaking children: Evidence for learning guided by phonological regularities. Journal of Child Language 34, 445–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D. (2004). Sampling children's spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31, 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, G. (1998). Emergent modularity and U-shaped learning in a constructivist neural network learning the English past tense. In Gernsbacher, M. & Derry, S. (eds), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1130–35. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit [Inflectional morphology and naturalness]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar