We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Arbib, M. A. & Hill, J. C. (1988). Language acquisition: schemas replace universal grammar. In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1988). The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N. & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language13. 275–92.Google Scholar
Gallaway, C. (1987). The emergence of a and the. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1988). Explaining language universals. In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar