Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:41:32.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2001

CARSON T. SCHÜTZE
CARSON T. SCHÜTZE
Affiliation:
UCLA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rispoli (1999) suggests that previous studies arguing for a contingency between the case of subject pronouns and the presence/absence of verbal agreement in the acquisition of English (e.g. Schütze, 1997) suffer from methodological problems, and presents new data that fail to support earlier findings. I show that Rispoli's methodology unnecessarily biases his study against finding the predicted contingencies: it fails to take account of children's productive lexical inventory of pronoun forms. As a result, syntactic versus morphological sources of error fail to be distinguished. I explain why this distinction is crucial within the AGR/Tense Omission Model, and clarify its predictions.

Type
NOTE
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 507 - 515
Copyright
2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank two anonymous reviewers and Elena Lieven for their comments on a previous version of this paper. This work was supported by a UCLA Academic Senate grant.