Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:26:22.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

T. M. S. Priestly
T. M. S. Priestly
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data are presented which reflect a particular strategy used by a boy from 1; 10 to 2; 2 to manage certain polysyllabic words. Analysis shows that substitution – although probably an impetus for this strategy – was not involved in most or even all of the strategic processes themselves. An interpretation is made in terms of ‘underlying forms’ (Ingram 1970); details of the strategy and its component sub-strategies (‘ruses’) are presented.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 45 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–77.Google Scholar
Blasdell, R. & Jensen, P. (1970). Stress and word-position as determinants of imitation in first-language learners. JSHR 13. 193–202.Google Scholar
Drachman, G. (1973). Some strategies in the acquisition of phonology. In Kenstowicz, M. J. & Kisseberth, C. W. (eds), Issues in phonological theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Drachman, G. (1975). Generative phonology and child language acquisition. In Dressier, W. U. & Mareš, F. V. (eds), Phonologica 1972. Akten der zweiten Internationalen Phonologie Tagung. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. L. (1971). One child's acquisition of English liquids. PRCLD 3. 101–9.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. L. & Garnica, O. (1973). Phonological variation in imitated and spontaneous utterances. PRCLD 5. 78.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1966). Language development. In Hoffmann, L. W. & Hoffmann, M. L. (eds), Review of child development researchM. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Lg 51. 419–39.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A., Peizer, D. P. & Weeks, T. E. (1973). Model-and-replica grammar of a child's first words. Lingua 31. 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammont, M. (1902). Observations sur le langage des enfants. In Mélanges linguistiques offerts à A. Meillet. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H-I. (1972). Lexical diffusion: evidence from child language acquisition. Glossa 6. 89–104.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1970). Some suggestions on the role of systematic phonemics in child phonology. PRCLD 1. 43–55.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974 a). Phonological rules in young children. JChLang 1. 49–64.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974 b). Fronting in child phonology. JChLang 1. 233–41.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala universitetes årsskrift, 1–83.Google Scholar
Kiterman, B. (1913). Opyt izuCenija slogovoj èlizii v detskom jazyke. Russkij filologičeskij vestnik 69.Google Scholar
Kresheck, J., Fisher, H. & Rutherford, D. (1972). A study of r-phones in the speech of three-year old children. FPhon 24. 301–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Ljamina, G. M. (1958). K voprosu o mexanizme ovladenija proiznošleniem slov u detej vtorogo i tret'ego goda žizni. Voprosy psixologii 6. 119–30.Google Scholar
McNeil, J. & Stone, J. (1965). Note on teaching children to hear separate sounds in spoken words. JEdPsych 56. 13–15.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1971). The acquisition and development of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1972). Clusters as single underlying consonants; evidence from children's production. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (The Hague: Mouton), 1161–5.Google Scholar
Mikeš, M. & Vlahović, P. (1967). Glasovna stuktura KVKV u razvojnom procesu asociativnog sistema glasova. Prilozi proučavanju jezika 3. 189–203.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, B. A. (1970). The two-year-old stage in the acquisition of English phonology. Lg 46. 426–41.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, B. A. (1972). The acquisition of phonology and syntax: a preliminary study. In Hintikka, K., et al. (eds), Approaches to natural languages. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ohnesorg, K. (1959). Druhá fonetická studie o dětské řeči. Bratislava: Brno University.Google Scholar
Oltuszewski, W. (1897). Die geistige und sprachliche Enturicklung des Kindes. Berlin: Fischer.Google Scholar
Pačesová, J. (1968). The development of the vocabulary of the child. Bratislava: Brno University.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. (forthcoming). On homonymy in child phonology.Google Scholar
Snow, E. (1963). A detailed analysis of articulation analyses of ‘normal’ first grade children. JSHR 6. 277–90.Google Scholar
Suxanova, N. V. (1968). Otnošenie razvitija vtoroj signal'noj sistemy v spektral'noj kartine detskoj reči. Žurnal vysšej nervnoj dejatel'nosti imeni Pavlova 18. 901–5.Google Scholar
Švačkin, N. X. (1948). Razvitie fonematičeskogo vosprijatija reči v rannem vozraste. Trudy instituta psixologii 13. 101–32.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology: a prosodic view. JL 7. 179–211.Google Scholar