Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:20:55.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-word repetition assesses phonological memory and is related to vocabulary development in 20- to 24-month-olds*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2008

ERIKA HOFF ,
CYNTHIA CORE  and
KELLY BRIDGES
ERIKA HOFF*
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
CYNTHIA CORE
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
KELLY BRIDGES
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
*
Address for correspondence: Erika Hoff, Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 2912 College Avenue, Davie, FL 33314, USA. tel: (954) 236-1142; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies test the hypotheses that individual differences in phonological memory among children younger than two years can be assessed using a non-word repetition task (NWR) and that these differences are related to the children's rates of vocabulary development. NWR accuracy, real word repetition accuracy and productive vocabulary were assessed in 15 children between 1 ; 9 and 2 ; 0 in Study 1 and in 21 children between 1 ; 8 and 2 ; 0 in Study 2. In both studies, NWR accuracy was significantly related to vocabulary percentile and, furthermore, uniquely accounted for a substantial portion of the variance in vocabulary when real word repetition accuracy was held constant. The findings establish NWR as a valid measure of phonological memory in very young children, and they open the door for further studies of the role of phonological memory in early word learning.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , November 2008 , pp. 903 - 916
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by a Presidential Research Development Award from Florida Atlantic University.

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E. & Papagano, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 105, 158–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowey, J. A. (2001). Nonword repetition and young children's receptive vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics 22, 441–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, J. A. & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Young children's sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 89, 183–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coady, J. A. & Evans, J. L. (2008). The uses and interpretations of nonword repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 43, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, A. & Roy, P. (2007). The Preschool Repetition Test: An evaluation of performance in typically developing and clinically referred children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 429–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S. & Reilly, J. S. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group. Inc.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Pethick, S., Renda, C., Cox, J. L., Dale, P. S. & Reznick, J. S. (2000). Short-form versions of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 513–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. & Adams, A.-M. (1993). Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology 29, 770–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Emslie, H. & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). The influence of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children's repetition of nonwords. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierut, J. A. (1998). Production, conceptualization and change in distinctive featural categories. Journal of Child Language 25, 321–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L., Schwartz, R. G., Morris, B. & Chapman, K. (1981). Factors influencing early lexical acquisition: Lexical orientation and phonological composition. Child Development 52, 882–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2, 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rvachew, S., Ohberg, A., Grawburg, M. & Heyding, J. (2003). Phonological awareness and phonemic perception in 4-year-old children with delayed expressive phonology skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 12, 463–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, E. & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign-language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics 16, 155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Lewis, B. A., McSweeny, J. L. & Wilson, D. L. (1997). The percentage of consonant correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 708–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. L., McGregor, K. K. & DeMille, D. (2006). Phonological development in lexically precocious 2-year-olds. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. J. (2006). Nonword repetition and language learning disorders: A developmental contingency framework. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 588–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Sosa, A. V. (2007). Phonological development. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (eds) The Blackwell handbook of language development, 238–56. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 1321–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stothard, S. E., Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., Chipchase, B. B. & Kaplan, C. A. (1998). Language-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up into adolescence. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 41, 407–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. (2007). Lexical exposure and word-form encoding in 1·5-year-olds. Developmental Psychology 43, 454–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A. (2004). A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36, 481–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development 1, 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar