Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:38:18.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mandarin-speaking three-year-olds' demonstration of productive knowledge of syntax: evidence from syntactic productivity and structural priming with the SVO-ba alternation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2013

DONG-BO HSU
DONG-BO HSU*
Affiliation:
National Taiwan Normal University – Department of Chinese as a Second Language
*
Address for correspondence: Dong-Bo Hsu, Department of Chinese as a Second Language, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 162 Section 1 Heping East Road, Daan District, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies investigated syntactic productivity in three-year-old Mandarin speakers' use of verbs in the SVO and SbaOV constructions. In Study 1, children were taught novel verbs in one construction and assessed for their production in the other construction. Children produced verbs taught in the ba constructions in SVO utterances, but showed order effects when producing verbs taught in SVO constructions in ba utterances. In Study 2, children described animated scenes either with structural priming (i.e., after hearing verbs in SVO or ba constructions). Children demonstrated structural priming, producing more SVO and ba utterances, respectively, directly after hearing verbs in these constructions. These results indicate that Mandarin speaking three-year-olds demonstrate productive knowledge of both SVO and SbaOV constructions. Their ability to override the predominant input frequency of SVO runs counter to a purely usage-based account of early acquisition of grammar.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 1115 - 1146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I would like to thank the children who took part in the study, their parents, and the staff. I am grateful to Jiayi Chen, Yushan Chou, Guozhong Fu, Lirong, Li, Yingchun Wu, Shiny Yang, and Wangrong Yin for their help in testing, collecting data, coding data, and reliability checking. I am also particularly thankful to the editor and associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers, for their precious time and comments that improved this manuscript greatly. All remaining errors are of course my own. My gratitude also goes to the Academic Paper Editing Clinic, NTNU. I am also thankful to the grants from Aims for the Top University program of the Ministry of Education, Taiwan and for the National Science Council (NSC99-2410-H-003-077 and NSC101-2410-H-003-067) of Taiwan. Without their support, such a publication would be next to impossible.

References

REFERENCES

Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. Cognitive Development 23, 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Funtionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), Language acquisition: the state of the art, 173–218. New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bencini, C. M. L. & Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in three-year-olds: evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18, 355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129, 177–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. J. & Tomasello, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology 35, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Candan, A., Kuntay, Aylin C., Yeh, Y.-C., Cheung, H., Wagner, L. & Naigles, L. R. (2012). Language and age effects in children's processing of word order. Cognitive Development 27, 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children's understanding of the agent–patient relations in the transitive construction: cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German and English. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113, 234–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, Hsin-Wu (1986). Young children's comprehension of the Chinese passives. In Kao, H. & Hoosain, R. (eds.), Linguistics, psychology and the Chinese language, 115–23. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Cheung, H. (1992). The acquisition of BA in Mandarin. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Conwell, E. & Demuth, K. (2007). Early syntactic productivity. Cognition 103, 163–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development 79, 1152–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2011). Children aged 2;1 use transitive syntax to make a semantic role interpretation in a pointing task. Journal of Child Language 38, 1109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, M. (1982). Coming to order: natural selection and the origin of syntax in the Mandarin-speaking child. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of analogy in children's interpretation of sentences. Cognitive Psychology 31, 41–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C. (2002a). Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of abstract structure in 2·5-year-olds' interpretations of novel verbs. Developmental Science 5, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. (2002b). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition 82, 259–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C., Gertner, Y., Scott, R. & Yuan, S. (2010). Syntactic bootstrapping. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1, 143–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Gertner, Y. & Fisher, C. (2012). Predicted errors in early sentence comprehension. Cognition 124, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C. & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science 17, 684–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, P. & Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition 36, 227–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, D.-B. (in press). Structural priming as learning: evidence from Mandarin-learning five-year-olds. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Li, Y.-H. Audrey. & Li, Y. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.-Y. & Yang, Suying (2004). The acquisitional study of ba construction among speakers taking Mandarin as a second language. Chinese Teaching in the World 1, 49–59.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M. & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 182–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, M., Johnson, C. & Brooks, P. (2000). From states to events: the acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 103–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M. & Borreggine, K. (2008). Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? Journal of Memory and Language 58, 862–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J. & Naigles, L. R. (2005). Input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: a role for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology 41, 529–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J. & Naigles, L. R. (2008). Mandarin learners use syntactic bootstrapping in verb acquisition. Cognition 106, 1028–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Thomas H.-T. (1996). Theoretical issues in language development and Chinese child language. In Huang, James C.-T. & Li, Audrey (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 293–356. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. (1993). The acquisition of the zai and ba constructions in Mandarin Chinese. In Liang, J. C. P. & Sybesma, R. P. E. (eds.), From classical ‘Fu’ to ‘Three inches High’: studies on Chinese in honor of Erik Zurcher, 103–20. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Bowerman, M. (1998). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in Chinese. First Language 18, 311–50.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 17, 357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition 86, 157–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. R. & Kako, E. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition: defining a role for syntax. Child Development 64, 1665–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noble, C., Rowland, C. & Pine, J. (2011). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: evidence from English-learning children and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science 35, 963–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistics representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Sciences 6, 557–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition. Language Learning & Development 2, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimpi, P. M., Gamez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J. & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology 43, 1334–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 1157–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: a crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12, 229–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedeker, J. & Thothathiri, M. (2008). What lurks beneath: syntactic priming during language comprehension in preschoolers (and adults). In Sekerina, I., Fernández, E. & Clahsen, H. (eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: on-line methods in children's language processing, 251–315. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sun, C.-F. & Givon, T. (1985). On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: a quantified text study and its implications. Language 61, 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, H.-M. (1989). Word order in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiaolu & Xiao, Dan (2008). A case study of acquisition of the BA construction in modern Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics 10, 200–10.Google Scholar
Yuan, S. & Fisher, C. (2009). ‘Really? She blicked the baby’: two-year olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science 20(5), 619–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, S., Fisher, C. & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development 83, 1382–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed