Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:44:02.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Mama’ and ‘papa’ in child language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Velta Rūķe-Draviņa
Velta Rūķe-Draviņa
Affiliation:
University of Stockholm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The concern of this case study is to show how the parental terms for ‘mummy’ and ‘daddy’ in Latvian are acquired, paying particular attention to the changing relationship between the input and output forms during the acquisition process. We may note here three questions which we shall attempt to answer. (1) Are parental terms the earliest words used spontaneously by the young child? (2) Does their ‘easier’ word structure allow the child to acquire the adult forms for these words earlier than is the case for the rest of the vocabulary? (3) Do the function and meaning of these parental terms correspond to those of the adults', and if not, what is the difference? And how stable are the meanings of these words during the first years of life?

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 157 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dravinš, K. & Rūke, V. (1955, 1956). Laute und Nominalformen der Mundart von Stenden, 1, 11. Lund.Google Scholar
Haviland, S. E. & Clark, E. V. (1974). ‘This man's father is my father's son’: a study of the acquisition of English kin terms. JChLang 1. 23–47.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Why ‘mama’ and ‘papa’? In Selected writings, 1. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1939). Speech development of a bilingual child, 1. Chicago: Evanston.Google Scholar
Ohnesorg, K. (1948). Fonetickà studie o dětské řeči. Prague: Facultas Philosophica, Universitas Carolina.Google Scholar
Ohnesorg, K. (1972). Une contribution à la pédophonétique comparée. In Ohnesorg, K. (ed.), Colloquium paedolinguisticum. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Piročkinas, A. (1974). Motinos vardas. In Zodšiai ir žmones. Vilnius: ‘Mintis’.Google Scholar
Rūke-Dravina, V. (1959). Diminutive im Lettischen. Lund: Slaviska Institutionen vid Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
Rūke-Dravina, V. (1963). Zur Sprachentwicklung bei Kleinkindern. Lund: Slaviska Institutionen vid Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
Rūke-Dravina, V. (1974). Modifications of speech addressed to young children in Latvian. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Input and Acquisition,Boston.Google Scholar