Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:29:54.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homonymy and reduplication: on the extended availability of two strategies in phonological acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Conxita Lleó*
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
*
Ibero-amerikanisches Forschungsinstitut, Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 6, 2000 Hamburg 13, West Germany.

Abstract

In the literature on phonological acquisition certain strategies such as homonymy and reduplication are viewed as phenomena appearing at a very early age, resulting from a deficient sound-inventory and sound-distribution. Data on homonymy and reduplication from a longitudinal study will be considered, which show that: (a) such strategies can appear later in the child's linguistic development than it has been proposed; (b) the lexical item has to be considered a central unit, beyond the earliest stages, in the acquisition of phonology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Drachman, G. (1973). Some strategies in the acquisition of phonology. In Kenstowicz, M. J. & Kisseberth, C. W. (eds), Issues in phonological theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fee, J. & Ingram, D. (1982). Reduplication as a strategy of phonological development. Journal of Child Language 9, 4154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, J. (1979). The aims of Autosegmental Phonology. In Dinnsen, D. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1975). Surface contrast in children's speech. Journal of Child Language 2. 287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. D. (1981). Procedures for the phonological analysis of children's language. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. D. (1985). On children's homonyms. Journal of Child Language 12. 671–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1978). Phonological units in beginning speech. In Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (eds), Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. G., Leonard, L. B., Wilcox, M. J. & Folger, M. K. (1980). Again and again: reduplication in child phonology. Journal of Child Language 7. 7587.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: its scope and function in child language. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1981). Phonology and the development of the lexicon: evidence from children's errors. Journal of Child Language 8. 239–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed