Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:22:04.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does size matter? Subsegmental cues to vowel mispronunciation detection*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2010

NIVEDITA MANI  and
KIM PLUNKETT
NIVEDITA MANI*
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
KIM PLUNKETT
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
*
Address for correspondence: Nivedita Mani, Free-Floater (Junior) Research Group, ‘Language Acquisition’, University of Göttingen, Gosslerstrasse, 14, 37073 Göttingen. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children look longer at a familiar object when presented with either correct pronunciations or small mispronunciations of consonants in the object's label, but not following larger mispronunciations. The current article examines whether children display a similar graded sensitivity to different degrees of mispronunciations of the vowels in familiar words, by testing children's sensitivity to 1-feature, 2-feature and 3-feature mispronunciations of the vowels of familiar labels: Children aged 1 ; 6 did not show a graded sensitivity to vowel mispronunciations, even when the trial length was increased to allow them more time to form a response. Two-year-olds displayed a robust sensitivity to increases in vowel mispronunciation size, differentiating between small and large mispronunciations. While this suggests that early lexical representations contain information about the features contributing to vocalic identity, we present evidence that this graded sensitivity is better explained by the acoustic characteristics of the different mispronunciation types presented to children.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 606 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by an ESRC grant RES-000-23-1322 awarded to Kim Plunkett.

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, T. & Plunkett, K. (2002). Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development 17, 1265–82.Google Scholar
Ballem, K. & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in 14-month-olds. Journal of Child Language 32, 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R. & Micell, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 403, 428–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connine, C. M., Titone, D., Deelman, T. & Blasko, D. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S., Fennell, C. & Escudero, P. (2009). Weighting of acoustic cues explains patterns of word-object associative learning. Developmental Science 12, 725–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerken, L., Murphy, W. D. & Aslin, R. N. (1995). 3-year olds' and 4-year-olds' perceptual confusions for spoken words. Perception and Psychophysics 57, 475–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition 87, B23–B34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, A., Plunkett, K. & Schafer, G. (2000). Infant vocabulary development assessed with a British communicative development inventory. Journal of Child Language 27, 689–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havy, M. & Nazzi, T. (2009). Better processing of consonantal over vocalic information in word learning at 16 months of age. Infancy 14(4), 439–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P., Williams, K., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255(5044), 606–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A., Delattre, P., Cooper, F. & Gerstman, L. (1954). The role of consonant–vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs 68, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, N., Coleman, J. & Plunkett, K. (2008). Phonological specificity of vocalic features at 18-months. Language and Speech 51, 3–21.Google Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2007). Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 57(2), 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2008a). Vowels and consonants, difference or no difference. Paper presented to the International Conference on Infant Studies, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2008b). 14-month-olds pay attention to vowels in novel words. Developmental Science 11(1), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, E. & Plunkett, K. (2009). Learning words over time: The role of stimulus repetition in mutual exclusivity. Infancy 14(1), 60–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. & Nicely, P. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(2), 338–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words, differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition 98(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., Moquet, B. & Butler, J. (2009). Bias for consonantal over vocalic information in French- and English-learning 30-month-olds: Crosslinguistic evidence in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102, 522–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., Pena, M. & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different role of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2, 203–229.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics 13(2), 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stager, C. L. & Werker, J. F. (1997). Children listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than word learning tasks. Nature 388, 381–82.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 76, 147–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighbourhoods and the word form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science 13(5), 480–84.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2007). Lexical competition in young children's word learning. Cognitive Psychology 54, 99–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F. & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR, A Developmental Framework of Infant Speech Processing. Language Learning and Development 1(2), 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M. & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy 3(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. & Tees, R. (1984). Cross-language speech perception, Evidence for perceptual reorganisation during the first year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. S. & Morgan, J. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar