Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:47:43.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do children interpret ‘marked’ comparative adjectives as their opposites?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

David J. Townsend
David J. Townsend
Affiliation:
Montclair State College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children aged 2;6–4;0 were asked questions containing comparative and superlative forms of adjectives from pairs designated as unmarked/marked or simply positive/negative. Children's answers required a choice of one out of five objects. Differences in frequency of correct responses were generally greater between unmarked/marked pairs than between simple positive/negative pairs, but the response of ‘greatest extent’ to marked adjective questions was seldom a significantly common error. Linguistic arguments for the unmarked/marked distinction in comparative adjectives are reviewed, and it is concluded that there is no linguistic or behavioural evidence for a marking explanation of children's difficulty with ‘marked’ comparative adjectives.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , October 1976 , pp. 385 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bierwisch, M. (1967). Some semantic universals of German adjectivals. FL 3. 1–36.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition 2. 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. PsychRev 76. 387–404.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1970). The primitive nature of children's relational concepts. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H.(1972). On the evidence concerning J. Huttenlocher and E. T. Higgins' theory of reasoning: a second reply. PsychRev 79. 428–32.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & Balfour, G. (1968). Less is more: a study of language comprehension in children. BJPsych 59. 461–71.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. & Higgins, E. T. (1971). Adjectives, comparatives, and syllogisms. PsychRev 78. 487–504.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1974). The comprehension of relative, absolute, and contrastive adjectives by young children. JPsycholingRes 3. 333–42.Google Scholar
Palermo, D. S. (1973). More about less: a study of comprehension. JVLVB 12. 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D. J. (1974). Children's comprehension of comparative forms. JExpChPsychol 18. 293–303.Google Scholar
Townsend, D. J. & Erb, M. (1975). Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions. JChLang 2. 1–7.Google Scholar