Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T18:53:10.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Data and beyond*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2014

PAUL FLETCHER
PAUL FLETCHER*
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perusing early issues of this Journal from nearly forty years ago, we find many topics on the contents lists that could appear in a current issue. But the resources available to contributors for addressing questions of interest have changed dramatically, not least in the public availability of data. Here we look briefly at two assets which have accrued to the field in the intervening decades, and at the contributions they make. CHILDES provides a level playing field on which debates about the import of language sample data, especially longitudinal data, can be played out. The MBCDI and its offspring encourage the collection of data from large samples of individuals and so promote the exploration of factors that may explain individual differences. Both have been major contributions to the field.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 41 , Issue S1: Reflections: 40 years of JCL , July 2014 , pp. 18 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Paul Fletcher, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Brookfield Health Sciences Centre, College Road, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: [email protected]

References

REFERENCES

Ambridge, B., Rowland, C., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What can experimental data tell us?’ Journal of Child Language 33, 519–57.Google Scholar
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. & Basbøll, H. (2008). Early vocabulary development in Danish and other languages: a CDI-based comparison. Journal of Child Language 35, 619–50.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Fey, M. & Finestack, L. (2009). Research and development in child language intervention: a five-phase model. In Schwartz, R. G. (ed.), Handbook of child language disorders, 513–31. New York/Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fey, M. & Loeb, D. F. (2002). An evaluation of the facilitative effects of yes-no questions on the acquisition of auxiliary verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 160–74.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. (1985). A child's learning of English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: the nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 513–43.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. N., Dale, P., Bleses, D. & Fenson, L. (2010). CLEX: a cross-linguistic lexical norms database. Journal of Child Language 37, 419–28.Google Scholar
Klee, T. & Harrison, C. (2001). CDI Words and Sentences: validity and preliminary norms for British English. Paper presented at Child Language Seminar, University of Hertfordshire, July.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, K., Simonsen, H. G., Bleses, D., Wehberg, S., Jørgensen, R. N., Eiesland, E. & Henriksen, L. (2013). The use of the Internet in collecting CDI data – an example from Norway. Journal of Child Language 40, 567–85.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Labov, T. (1978). Learning the syntax of questions. In Campbell, R. & Smith, P. (eds), Recent advances in the psychology of language: language development and mother–child interaction, 1–44. London/New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2013). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk – Electronic Edition. Part 1: the CHAT transcription format. Online: <http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/chat.pdf> (last accessed 17 January 2014).+(last+accessed+17+January+2014).>Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2014). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk – Electronic Edition. Part 2: the CLAN programs. Online: <http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/clan.pdf> (last accessed 17 January 2014).+(last+accessed+17+January+2014).>Google Scholar
O'Toole, C. & Fletcher, P. (2010). Validity of a parent report instrument for Irish-speaking toddlers. First Language 30, 199–217.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. (2000). Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What do children know?’ Journal of Child Language 27, 157–81.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. F. & Theakston, A. L. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: the modals and auxiliary DO. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 1471–92.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. (2010). Neighbourhood density and word frequency in toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 670–83.Google Scholar
Stokes, S., Kern, S. & Dos Santos, C. (2012). Extended statistical learning as an account for slow vocabulary growth. Journal of Child Language 39, 105–29.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. & Klee, T. (2009). Factors that influence vocabulary development in two-year-old children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 50, 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W.-L. & Kaciroti, N. (2009). Early vocabulary development in Mandarin (Putonghua) and Cantonese. Journal of Child Language 36, 1115–44.Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Zhang, Z. X. & Liang, W.-L. (2008). Chinese Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and manual. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L. & Rowland, C. F. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 1449–70.Google Scholar
Wells, C. G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M. (2009). Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36, 1023–51.Google Scholar